By Andy Mukherjee

It has been China’s long-held dream to dethrone King Dollar. Beijing got its first break after Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, and Russian lenders were deleted overnight from the messaging system that moves the world’s money. However, back in 2022, the yuan was nowhere close to confronting the hegemon. It would take four more years of preparation — and another war — to make it a contender. 

I argued in early February that those looking for evidence of the challenge to the US currency in payment flows were searching in the wrong place. For years to come, de-dollarisation will remain hidden in additions and alterations to financial plumbing.

But that was before the conflict in West Asia. A lot has changed in the past six weeks. China is the largest buyer of Iran’s seaborne oil. The price its refineries pay stays in “controlled accounts” at small Chinese banks cut off from dollar trade. According to the Atlantic Council, these funds are used to pay Chinese contractors or cover imports: an “oil-for-goods” swap. And now Tehran says that it will accept toll payments from ships crossing the Strait of Hormuz in cryptocurrencies or the yuan.

It’s a rebellion against America’s financial hegemony on three fronts simultaneously: the payment currency, the messaging system, and the settlement mechanism. Were a peace plan to remove US sanctions against Iran, the greenback might regain some of the trust it has lost. But China’s currency won’t go away. It will simply lie in wait for the next geopolitical crisis.  

At nearly 50 per cent of all international payments, the dollar’s dominance is stark. The yuan’s share, according to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, or Swift, is just 2.7 per cent, lower than in 2024. Yet China is serious about pitching its currency as an alternative. The digital version, e-yuan, moves over the blockchain. The technology integrates messaging, reconciliation and asset transfer into a single, seamless operation, bypassing Swift, the panopticon through which the US surveils global financial flows. Project mBridge, a digital platform shared by the central banks of China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, has already processed over $55 billion in trade, with the e-yuan accounting for 95 per cent of the volume.

But the blockchain is still a small part of how claims get disposed of. Most international transfers gravitate to a New York private institution, known as the Clearing House Interbank Payments System, or Chips. Its participants liquidate obligations using pre-funded accounts at the Federal Reserve. They all maintain US offices and are subject to US law.

Beijing’s discomfort is precisely on that point. The US Department of Justice built its bank-fraud and wire-fraud case against Huawei Technologies Co.’s finance chief Meng Wanzhou by finding dollar transactions routed through Chips in New York. In US law, the moment a digit representing a dollar touches a server on American soil — even for a millisecond — it grants the US government jurisdiction.

The trigger was Washington’s December 2023 executive order authorising secondary sanctions on foreign banks facilitating trade for Russia. Fearing a total disconnect from the dollar, banks in the UAE, Turkey, and Central Asia scrambled to migrate their settlement to the yuan. The mainland’s weak domestic economy also helped. Disinflation led to lower onshore interest rates just when the cost of borrowing dollars was rising. That boosted the attractiveness of the Chinese currency in trade financing.

Hong Kong banks recently doubled their permissioned access to onshore Chinese liquidity amid strong client demand for yuan-denominated loans. Last year, DBS Group Holdings Ltd.’s Singapore unit became an overseas direct participant of Cips. Banks connecting directly to Cips using its internal messaging protocol — bypassing Swift entirely — have grown by nearly 40 per cent since 2024, reaching 193 institutions. With just 42 members, Chips, the New York club, is a lot more elitist. 

As analysts Benn Steil and Yuma Schuster noted in a Council on Foreign Relations report last month, the decline in the yuan’s share in Swift payments data is misleading: It doesn’t mean less usage; it means that trade messages have gone private and become less visible. 

Back in 2020, Syracuse University professor Daniel McDowell argued that the more the US wields its unmatched financial power, the less it may have left. Subsequent events have proved him right. After all, if payments accompanying 20 per cent of the world’s oil and gas can move through a digital pipe that the US Treasury cannot see, then America’s dominance of global finance has effectively been handed an expiry date. 

 
(Disclaimer: This is a Bloomberg Opinion piece, and these are the personal opinions of the writer. They do not reflect the views of www.business-standard.com or the Business Standard newspaper)