All Time Plastics’ ₹401-crore IPO to open on Aug 7; sets price band at ₹260-275/share

All Time Plastics’ ₹401-crore IPO to open on Aug 7; sets price band at ₹260-275/share


Consumerware products maker All Time Plastics on Monday fixed a price band of ₹260 to ₹275 per share for its ₹401-crore initial public offering (IPO).

The initial share-sale will be open for public subscription on August 7 and conclude on August 11, the company announced.

At the upper-end of the price band, the company is valued over ₹1,800 crore.

The IPO is a combination of fresh issuance of equity shares worth up to ₹280 crore by the company, and an offer-for-sale of over 43.8 lakh equity shares valued ₹120.6 crore, at the upper-end of the price band, by promoters. This takes the total issue size to ₹401 crore.

The company plans to utilise funds raised from fresh issuance for acquiring machinery for its Manekpur plant in Gujarat, payment of debt, general corporate purposes and other expansion efforts.

Half of the issue size has been reserved for qualified institutional buyers, 35 per cent for retail investors and the remaining 15 per for non-institutional investors.

All Time Plastics has 14 years’ experience of manufacturing plastic consumerware products for everyday household needs. It primarily exports products to retailers in the European Union, the UK, and the US. In India, it sells through modern trade retailers, super distributors (who supply to distributors), and distributors (who supply to general trade stores).

Intensive Fiscal Services and DAM Capital Advisors are the merchant bankers for All Time Plastics’ public issue. The company is expected to list on the stock exchanges on August 14.

More Like This

Published on August 4, 2025



Source link

ट्रंप की धमकियों का नहीं असर, भारत के बाद चीन ने भी किया क्लियर; रूस से तेल की खरीद रहेगी जारी

ट्रंप की धमकियों का नहीं असर, भारत के बाद चीन ने भी किया क्लियर; रूस से तेल की खरीद रहेगी जारी


China Crude Oil Import: अमेरिका चाहता है कि रूस और ईरान से तेल की खरीदारी नहीं की जाए. इस क्रम में इन दोनों से तेल खरीदने वाले देशों पर सख्ती बरती जा रही है. अमेरिका की यही डिमांड चीन से भी है. अब चीन ने इस पर अपनी राय जाहिर की है. दोनों देशों के अधिकारियों के बीच स्टॉकहोम में चली दो दिनों की वार्ता के बाद बुधवार को चीन के विदेश मंत्रालय ने एक्स पर लिखा, चीन अपनी एनर्जी सप्लाई को अपने नेशनल इंटरेस्ट के हिसाब से सुनिश्चित करेगा. इस पोस्ट में आगे लिखा गया, जबरदस्ती और दबाव से कुछ हासिल नहीं होगा. चीन अपनी संप्रभुता, सुरक्षा और विकास हितों की दृढ़ता से रक्षा करेगा. 

बैठक में इस बात पर बनी सहमति 

अमेरिका में चीनी आयात पर भारी-भरकम टैरिफ की घोषणा और व्यापार प्रतिबंधों को सुलझाने के मकसद से दोनों देशों के अधिकारियों के बीच स्टॉकहोम में बैठक हुई. इसमें अमेरिका की तरफ से वित्त मंत्री स्कॉट बेसेंट शामिल हुए थे, जबकि चीन का प्रतिनिधित्व वहां के उप प्रधानमंत्री हे लाइफेंग ने किया था.

इस बैठक के बाद तय हुआ कि दोनों देश फिलहाल एक-दूसरे पर टैरिफ नहीं बढ़ाएंगे. अमेरिका चीनी वस्तुओं के आयात पर 30 परसेंट टैरिफ वसूलेगा, जबकि चीन अमेरिकी आयात पर 10 परसेंट ही टैरिफ लगाएगा. हालांकि, इस पर आखिरी फैसला ट्रंप ही लेंगे. बेसेंट की दी गई जानकारी के मुताबिक, दोनों में फिर से शायद 90 दिनों में एक और बैठक हो सकती है. इस बीच, उर्जा की खरीद को लेकर चीन के इस स्पष्ट और कठोर रूख का क्या असर होगा, यह तो आने वाले दिनों में ही पता चलेगा. 

चीन के लिए अपनी संप्रभुता सबसे आगे 

स्टॉकहोम में चली वार्ता के बाद जब बेसेंट से जब रूस से तेल खरीद की खरीद को लेकर सवाल पूछा गया, तो उन्होंने बताया, ”चीन अपनी संप्रभुता को बहुत गंभीरता से लेता है. इसमें हम खलल नहीं डालना चाहेंगे. चीन भी शायद 100 परसेंट टैरिफ देना चाहेगा.” बता दें कि ट्रंप ने चेतावनी दी है कि जो भी देश रूस से तेल खरीदेगा उस पर 100 परसेंट तक टैरिफ लगाया जाएगा. 

 

ये भी पढ़ें: 

बढ़ सकती है पेट्रोल-डीजल की कीमत, रूस-अमेरिका के बीच टेंशन का ग्लोबल ऑयल की सप्लाई पर असर



Source link

US-China trade talks strained by Beijing’s defiance on Iran, Russia oil

US-China trade talks strained by Beijing’s defiance on Iran, Russia oil


 Energy trade remains critical for China, which sources most of Iran’s oil and is a top buyer of Russian crude. 

Energy trade remains critical for China, which sources most of Iran’s oil and is a top buyer of Russian crude. 
| Photo Credit:
Eli Hartman/Reuters

US and Chinese officials may be able to settle many of their differences to reach a trade deal and avert punishing tariffs, but they remain far apart on one issue: the US demand that China stop purchasing oil from Iran and Russia.

“China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests,” China’s Foreign Ministry posted on X on Wednesday, following two days of trade negotiations in Stockholm, responding to the US threat of a 100 per cent tariff.

“Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything. China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security and development interests,” the ministry said.

The response is notable at a time when both Beijing and Washington are signalling optimism and goodwill about reaching a deal to keep commercial ties between the world’s two largest economies stable — after climbing down from sky-high tariffs and harsh trade restrictions. It underscores China’s confidence in playing hardball when dealing with the Trump administration, especially when trade is linked to its energy and foreign policies.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, emerging from the talks, told reporters that when it comes to Russian oil purchases, the “Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously”.

“We do not want to impede on their sovereignty, so they would like to pay a 100 per cent tariff,” Bessent said.

On Thursday, he called the Chinese “tough” negotiators, but said China’s pushback has not stalled the negotiations. “I believe that we have the makings of a deal,” Bessent told CNBC.

Analysts doubt tariff threats will materialise

Gabriel Wildau, managing director of the consultancy Teneo, said he doubts President Donald Trump would actually deploy the 100 per cent tariff. “Realising those threats would derail all the recent progress and probably kill any chance” for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to announce a trade deal if they should meet this fall, Wildau said.

In seeking to restrict oil sales by Russia and Iran, a major source of revenue for both countries, the US wants to reduce the funding available for their militaries, as Moscow pursues its war against Ukraine and Tehran funds militant groups across the Middle East.

China plays hardball

When Trump unveiled a sweeping plan for tariffs on dozens of countries in April, China was the only country that retaliated. It refused to give in to US pressure.

“If the US is bent on imposing tariffs, China will fight to the end, and this is China’s consistent official stance,” said Tu Xinquan, director of the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. WTO is the acronym for the World Trade Organization.

Negotiating tactics aside, China may also suspect that the US will not follow through on its threat, questioning the importance Trump places on countering Russia, Tu said.

Scott Kennedy, senior adviser and trustee chair in Chinese Business and Economics at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said Beijing is unlikely to change its posture when it sees inconsistencies in US foreign policy goals toward Russia and Iran, whereas Beijing’s policy support for Moscow is consistent and clear. It is also possible that Beijing may want to use it as another negotiating tool to extract more concessions from Trump, Kennedy said.

Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Beijing now sees itself as “the one holding the cards in its struggle with Washington”. He said Trump has made it clear he wants a “headline-grabbing deal” with Xi, “so rejecting a US demand to stop buying oil from Iran or Russia is probably not seen as a deal-breaker, even if it generates friction and a delay”.

Continuing to buy oil from Russia preserves Xi’s “strategic solidarity” with Russian President Vladimir Putin and significantly reduces the economic costs for China, Russel said.

“Beijing simply cannot afford to walk away from the oil from Russia and Iran,” he said. “It is too important a strategic energy supply, and Beijing is buying it at fire-sale prices.” China depends on oil from Russia and Iran A 2024 report by the US Energy Information Administration estimates that roughly 80 per cent to 90 per cent of the oil exported by Iran went to China. The Chinese economy benefits from the more than one million (10 lakh) barrels of Iranian oil it imports per day.

After the Iranian parliament floated a plan to shut down the Strait of Hormuz in June following US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, China spoke out against closing the critical oil transit route.

China also is an important customer for Russia, but is second to India in buying Russian seaborne crude oil exports. In April, Chinese imports of Russian oil rose 20 per cent over the previous month to more than 1.3 million (13 lakh) barrels per day, according to the KSE Institute, an analytical centre at the Kyiv School of Economics.

India also faces US Tariff heat over Russian oil

This past week, Trump said the US will impose a 25 per cent tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India’s purchasing of Russian oil. India’s Foreign Ministry said on Friday its relationship with Russia was “steady and time-tested”.

Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and a top policy adviser, said Trump has been clear that it is “not acceptable” for India to continue financing the Ukraine war by purchasing oil from Russia.

“People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil,” Miller said on Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures”. He said the US needs “to get real about dealing with the financing of this war”. (AP) RC

Published on August 4, 2025



Source link

Chander Sethi: Tiger in the consumer aisles

Chander Sethi: Tiger in the consumer aisles


Chander Mohan Sethi, the recently deceased former chairman and MD of Reckitt Benckiser India (file image)

Chander Mohan Sethi, the recently deceased former chairman and MD of Reckitt Benckiser India (file image)
| Photo Credit:
SOMASHEKARA GRN

The consumer goods space lost a tall leader last week when Chander Mohan Sethi, former chairman and MD of Reckitt Benckiser India, passed away in Mumbai. Sethi worked for a decade in Glaxo SmithKline before moving to Reckitt Benckiser (now known as Reckitt), where he spent nearly 30 years and made it a powerhouse, driving brands like Dettol and Cherry Blossom.

He managed the acquisition of Paras Pharma’s FMCG products to bring brands like Moov and Dermicool into the British consumer goods major’s fold. He launched brands like Veet, and accelerated the penetration of Lizol and Harpic into Indian homes. Post Reckitt, Sethi was chairman of Brillon Consumer Products, formerly known as SC Johnson India, which owns brands such as All Out, Baygon, Kiwi, Glade, and Mr. Muscle.

Known as Tiger, Sethi kept a low profile but was admired for his forthright and fearless leadership style. Tributes pouring in on LinkedIn describe his quick decision-making skills. Advertising veteran Rohit Ohri, for instance, recalled that when FCB was making a pitch for Baygon, Sethi approved it without dilly-dallying. “That was Chander — fearless, forthright, and always true to his gut,” Ohri wrote.

More Like This

Published on August 4, 2025



Source link

MPC members could be on the horns of a dilemma on repo rate decision at their upcoming meeting

MPC members could be on the horns of a dilemma on repo rate decision at their upcoming meeting


To cut or hold the policy repo rate — this could be a tough call for RBI’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) at its upcoming meeting.

While a section of the experts opine that the rate setting panel should take a breather after cutting the policy repo rate by cumulative 100 basis points (bps), the others think it should persist with its frontloaded rate cut cycle.

Those batting for a pause expect the earlier rate cuts to work their way into the economy.

The pause is likely in the backdrop of retail inflation remaining below the panel’s 4 per cent target for the fifth consecutive month in June (at 2.1 per cent), the uncertain impact on growth due to Trump’s 25 per cent tariffs on US’ imports from India and its weakening effect on the Rupee, and possibility of negotiating lower tariffs with the US.

Moreover, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra’s recent comments probably hint at a pause in the Monetary Policy Committee’s (MPC) upcoming meeting, scheduled from August 4-6.

In his comments at a fireside chat hosted by a business publication, Malhotra observed that the change in the monetary policy stance to “neutral” in the June bi-monthly policy review (from “accommodative”) along with the 50 bps repo rate cut indicates that the bar for further easing is higher than it would have been if the stance was accommodative.

The MPC has cut the policy repo rate thrice since February — 25 basis points (bps) each in February and April bi-monthly monetary policy review and by a jumbo 50 bps in June. The repo rate is currently at 5.50 per cent against 6.50 per cent before the February rate cut.

CARE Ratings’ Chief Economist Rajani Sinha and Senior Economist Sarbartho Mukherjee observed that the RBI had already frontloaded the rate cuts, anticipating the moderation in inflation. Hence, further rate cuts are unlikely unless growth concerns aggravate.

The rating agency’s economists noted that with the RBI having already frontloaded rate cuts and ensuring ample liquidity, the MPC may prefer to pause for now and assess how the macroeconomic landscape evolves.

Additionally, transmission of the previous rate cuts is still underway and could take some more time to show its effect on the economy.

Moreover, a hawkish stance from the US Federal Reserve, ongoing trade tension with the US and recent appreciation of the US dollar index could provide further reasons for adopting a wait-and-watch approach, as additional pressure on the rupee may emerge.

“Nonetheless, we expect the RBI’s policy statement to retain a dovish tone, while maintaining a cautious outlook on evolving global developments,” Sinha and Mukherjee said.

Barclays’ Economists, in a report, said they expect the RBI’s MPC to deliver a dovish pause in the upcoming 6 August policy, retaining the stance as ‘neutral’.

The MPC will likely revise down their forecast (of 3.7 per cent) for FY25-26 CPI inflation, but leave growth projection (6.5 per cent) unchanged, they added. The economists expect a final 25 basis point cut in October, taking the terminal rate to 5.25% .

Frontloaded cuts

SBI’s Chief Economic Adviser Soumya Kanti Ghosh said: “We expect RBI to continue frontloading with a 25 bps cut in the August policy. We are living in a frontloaded world. Tariff uncertainty frontloaded…better GDP growth frontloaded for now…CPI numbers in FY27 to continue to be frontloaded with even a sub 4 per cent number with new CPI series…even festive season is frontloaded in FY26.”

He underscored that empirical evidence suggests a strong pick up in credit growth whenever festive season has been early and has been preceded with a rate cut.

Aditi Nayar, Chief Economist, ICRA, said with the recent CPI prints signaling a lower trajectory for the second half of this calendar year, the average for FY2026 is likely to be pared from the MPC’s June 2025 guidance of 3.7%.

Further, the tariffs imposed by the US will pose a downside risk to GDP growth, while admittedly injecting volatility into the Indian Rupee.

“In our view, the balance remains slightly tilted towards a final rate cut of 25 bps in the August 2025 policy review,” she said.

Published on August 3, 2025



Source link

Anti-militancy operation in Kashmir’s Kulgam enters third day; two militants killed

Anti-militancy operation in Kashmir’s Kulgam enters third day; two militants killed


Security personnel on vigil following an encounter with terrorists in Akhal, in Kulgam district, Jammu and Kashmir

Security personnel on vigil following an encounter with terrorists in Akhal, in Kulgam district, Jammu and Kashmir
| Photo Credit:
PTI

A major anti-militancy operation in south Kashmir’s Kulgam district entered its third day on Sunday, with two militants killed in a gunfight with security forces, said officials.

The encounter began on Friday evening in the Akhal forest area of Devsar, about 70 km south of Srinagar, after security forces launched a search operation based on intelligence inputs about the presence of militants.

“As troops zeroed in on a suspected hideout, they came under fire, triggering an encounter,” said a police official.

Body of one militant recovered

Intermittent gunfire and explosions continued on Sunday. Two security personnel were also injured, according to officials. Of the two militants, reportedly killed, the body of only one has been recovered so far.

The ongoing operation is the second major anti-insurgency action in Kashmir in just over a week.

On July 28, three Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) militants, allegedly involved in the Pahalgam attack, were killed in a separate encounter. In another incident, the Indian Army said on Wednesday that its troops shot dead two militants attempting to infiltrate across the Line of Control (LoC) in Poonch district, near the border with Pakistan.

In the wake of the Pahalgam killings, security forces intensified counterinsurgency operations, killing at least six militants in two separate encounters in south Kashmir within a week of the attack.

Published on August 3, 2025



Source link