MCXCCL levies additional margin in gold, silver futures

MCXCCL levies additional margin in gold, silver futures


Multi Commodity Exchange Clearing Corporation, part of the country’s largest commodity exchange, has levied an additional margin on gold and silver futures.

MCXCCL said in view of periodic review of adequacy of risk management measures and to mitigate systemic risk, it is decided to levy an additional margin of 4.5 per cent in silver futures contracts (all variants) and 1 per cent in gold future contracts (all variants) with effect from Thursday.

Further, an additional margin of 2.5 per cent in Silver Futures contracts (all variants) and 2 per cent in Gold futures contracts (all variants) from Friday over and above the margin levied on Thursday.

Both gold and silver prices have been volatile in the last few days. In addition, the volatility in value of the rupee against the dollar has enhanced the risk further in the domestic markets, said an analyst.

Published on February 5, 2026



Source link

गिरकर संभलना हो रहा मुश्किल, शेयर बाजार की आज भी कमजोर शुरुआत; सेंसेक्स और निफ्टी दोनों फिसले

गिरकर संभलना हो रहा मुश्किल, शेयर बाजार की आज भी कमजोर शुरुआत; सेंसेक्स और निफ्टी दोनों फिसले


Share Market Today: शेयर मार्केट की शुरुआत आज भी पिछले कारोबारी सेशन की तरह गिरावट के साथ हुई. बीएसई सेंसेक्स 0.07 परसेंट की गिरावट के साथ 83800 के लेवल पर कारोबार की शुरुआत की, जबकि निफ्टी 0.08 परसेंट लुढ़ककर 25800 के नीचे कारोबार करता नजर आया.

सुबह 8:45 बजे तक GIFT निफ्टी भी 0.17 परसेंट या 46 अंक नीचे, जिससे शेयर बाजार की कमजोर शुरुआत के संकेत मिल रहे थे. अनुमान लगाया जा रहा है कि आज शेयर बाजार में कारोबार स्टॉक-स्पेसिफिक होगा क्योंकि भारती एयरटेल, टाटा मोटर्स PV, हीरो मोटोकॉर्प और लाइफ इंश्योरेंस कॉर्प जैसी कई कंपनियों के तिमाही नतीजे आ रहे हैं. 

एशियाई बाजार में मिला-जुला कारोबार

गुरुवार को ज्यादातर एशियाई बाजार दबाव में रहे.  कई प्रमुख इंडेक्स में गिरावट देखी गई. जापान का निक्केई 225 0.15 परसेंट चढ़ा, जबकि 0.47 परसेंट की उछाल के साथ टॉपिक्स हरे निशान पर कारोबार करता नजर आया. इससे उलट, दक्षिण कोरिया का कोस्पी 1.31 परसेंट की भारी गिरावट के साथ बंद हुआ और ऑस्ट्रेलिया का S&P/ASX 200 भी 0.18 परसेंट की गिरावट के साथ नीचे लुढ़क गया.

वॉल स्ट्रीट का हाल

अमेरिकी बाजार 4 फरवरी को मिले-जुले रुख के साथ बंद हुए क्योंकि टेक्नोलॉजी शेयरों में भारी बिकवाली से सेंटिमेंट पर असर पड़ा. S&P 500 0.51 परसेंट गिरकर 6,882.72 पर बंद हुआ, जिसमें एडवांस्ड माइक्रो डिवाइसेस जैसे बड़ी कंपनियों को हुए नुकसान के कारण गिरावट आई. नैस्डैक कंपोजिट पर ज्यादा दबाव देखा गया, जो 1.51 परसेंट फिसलकर 22,904.58 पर आ गया. इस बीच, डॉव जोन्स इंडस्ट्रियल एवरेज 260.31 अंक या 0.53 परसेंट ऊपर चढ़कर 49501.30 पर बंद हुआ.

विदेशी और घरेलू निवेशकों की खरीद

शुरुआती डेटा से पता चलता है कि 4 फरवरी को फॉरेन इंस्टीट्यूशनल इन्वेस्टर्स (FIIs) ने 29.79 करोड़ रुपये के भारतीय शेयरों की खरीदारी की, जबकि डोमेस्टिक इंस्टीट्यूशनल इन्वेस्टर्स (DIIs) या घरेलू निवेशकों ने इससे कहीं ज्यादा 249.54 करोड़ रुपये के शेयर खरीदे.

ये भी पढ़ें:

रुस से तेल की खरीद पर रोक, ट्रेड डील और एग्रीकल्चर का बाजार… वित्त मंत्री निर्मला सीतारमण ने क्या-क्या कहा 



Source link

Musk vows to put data centres in space, run them on solar power but experts have their doubts

Musk vows to put data centres in space, run them on solar power but experts have their doubts


File pic: Elon Musk waves to the crowd during the 56th annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, last month
| Photo Credit:
DENIS BALIBOUSE

Elon Musk vowed this week to upend another industry just as he did with cars and rockets — and once again he’s taking on long odds.

The world’s richest man said he wants to put as many as a million satellites into orbit to form vast, solar-powered data centres in space — a move to allow expanded use of artificial intelligence and chatbots without triggering blackouts and sending utility bills soaring.

To finance that effort, Musk combined SpaceX with his AI business on Monday and plans a big initial public offering of the combined company.

“Space-based AI is obviously the only way to scale,” Musk wrote on SpaceX’s website Monday, adding about his solar ambitions, “It’s always sunny in space!”

But scientists and industry experts say even Musk, who outsmarted Detroit to turn Tesla into the world’s most valuable automaker, faces formidable technical, financial and environmental obstacles.

Feeling the heat

Capturing the sun’s energy from space to run chatbots and other AI tools would ease pressure on power grids and cut demand for sprawling computing warehouses that are consuming farms and forests and vast amounts of water to cool.

But space presents its own set of problems.

Data centres generate enormous heat. Space seems to offer a solution because it is cold. But it is also a vacuum, trapping heat inside objects in the same way that a Thermos keeps coffee hot using double walls with no air between them.

“An uncooled computer chip in space would overheat and melt much faster than one on Earth,” said Josep Jornet, a computer and electrical engineering professor at Northeastern University.

One fix is to build giant radiator panels that glow in infrared light to push the heat “out into the dark void,” says Jornet, noting that the technology has worked on a small scale, including on the International Space Station. But for Musk’s data centres, he says, it would require an array of “massive, fragile structures that have never been built before.”

Floating debris

Then there is space junk.

A single malfunctioning satellite breaking down or losing orbit could trigger a cascade of collisions, potentially disrupting emergency communications, weather forecasting and other services.

Musk noted in a recent regulatory filing that he has had only one “low-velocity debris generating event” in seven years running Starlink, his satellite communications network. Starlink has operated about 10,000 satellites but that’s a fraction of the million or so he now plans to put in space.

“We could reach a tipping point where the chance of collision is going to be too great,” said University at Buffalo’s John Crassidis, a former NASA engineer. “And these objects are going fast — 17,500 miles per hour. There could be very violent collisions.”

No repair crews

Even without collisions, satellites fail, chips degrade, parts break.

Special GPU graphics chips used by AI companies, for instance, can become damaged and need to be replaced.

“On Earth, what you would do is send someone down to the data centre,” said Baiju Bhatt, CEO of Aetherflux, a space-based solar energy company. “You replace the server, you replace the GPU, you’d do some surgery on that thing and you’d slide it back in.”

But no such repair crew exists in orbit, and those GPUs in space could get damaged due to their exposure to high-energy particles from the sun.

Bhatt says one workaround is to overprovision the satellite with extra chips to replace the ones that fail. But that’s an expensive proposition given they are likely to cost tens of thousands of dollars each, and current Starlink satellites only have a lifespan of about five years.

Competition — and leverage

Musk is not alone trying to solve these problems.

A company in Redmond, Washington, called Starcloud, launched a satellite in November carrying a single Nvidia-made AI computer chip to test out how it would fare in space. Google is exploring orbital data centres in a venture it calls Project Suncatcher. And Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin announced plans in January for a constellation of more than 5,000 satellites to start launching late next year, though its focus has been more on communications than AI.

Still, Musk has an edge: He’s got rockets.

Starcloud had to use one of his Falcon rockets to put its chip in space last year. Aetherflux plans to send a set of chips it calls a Galactic Brain to space on a SpaceX rocket later this year. And Google may also need to turn to Musk to get its first two planned prototype satellites off the ground by early next year.

Pierre Lionnet, a research director at the trade association Eurospace, says Musk routinely charges rivals far more than he charges himself — as much as $20,000 per kilo of payload versus $2,000 internally.

He said Musk’s announcements this week signal that he plans to use that advantage to win this new space race.

“When he says we are going to put these data centres in space, it’s a way of telling the others we will keep these low launch costs for myself,” said Lionnet. “It’s a kind of powerplay.”

Published on February 5, 2026



Source link

Fed holds bank capital buffers steady until 2027 amid stress test overhaul

Fed holds bank capital buffers steady until 2027 amid stress test overhaul


Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said stress capital buffers will instead be updated in 2027 after public feedback helps address any flaws in testing models.
| Photo Credit:

The U.S. Federal ‍Reserve
announced on Wednesday it would not adjust large bank ​capital
levels during the 2026 stress testing cycle, as ‌the central bank
considers several changes to ​the annual exercise aimed at
boosting transparency.

Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said large banks’
“stress capital buffers” will instead be revised in 2027, after
the Fed has had a chance to identify any shortcomings in the
models it uses to test large bank finances ​against a
hypothetical economic downturn. The Fed voted ⁠in October to make
its testing models open to public feedback, as well as the
scenarios they test banks against every year.

“Waiting to ​calculate new stress capital ⁠buffer requirements
until we receive public feedback will give us the opportunity to
correct any deficiencies in our supervisory models based on that
feedback,” Bowman said in ‌a statement.

The announcement came as the Fed published ‌its scenarios for the
2026 testing cycle, which envisioned a steep increase in
unemployment, severe market ‍volatility, and a steep decline in
asset prices. Last year’s exam found banks were well-positioned
to weather a major ‍downturn and continue lending, as their
capital levels remained well above regulatory minimums.

Banks had long complained that the central bank’s annual
exams were opaque and subjective, particularly since how well
each firm performed determined how much capital they would have
to set aside to guard against potential losses in the coming
year. The Fed’s decision to make ⁠its testing models public, and
responsive to public feedback, was a major win for the ​industry.

Fed Governor Michael Barr, who previously served as the
Fed’s ⁠top regulatory official under President Joe Biden,
dissented from Wednesday’s decision, arguing that freezing bank
capital levels could make the stress tests “stagnate,” and
instead the Fed should set capital on the most recent measure ⁠of
banks’ risks via the upcoming exam.

Published on February 5, 2026



Source link

US stocks fall as AI valuation fears hit tech and chipmakers

US stocks fall as AI valuation fears hit tech and chipmakers


Alphabet slipped ahead of earnings but rebounded after announcing increased AI spending.
| Photo Credit:
Brendan McDermid

U.S. stocks ended lower on Wednesday,
with losses in Advanced Micro Devices, Palantir ​and other
technology companies, as investors worried about pricey
valuations and whether Wall Street’s ‌AI rally has reached its
peak.
Alphabet fell almost 2% ahead of its quarterly ​results
after the bell. After the close, it regained 2% as the company
said it was aggressively ramping up spending as it deepens its
investments in the AI race.

Advanced Micro Devices tumbled 17% after the
chipmaker forecast quarterly revenue that disappointed investors
and suggested it is having a tough time competing against AI
heavyweight Nvidia.
Nvidia dropped 3.4% and the PHLX semiconductor index fell
4.4%.
Palantir slumped almost 12%, reversing sharp gains from
the previous day that were driven by the AI ​data company’s
strong quarterly sales.

“The size of the infrastructure buildout is unprecedented,
and the pace ⁠of consumers and businesses adopting AI tools is
also unprecedented. The stock market is having a really hard
knowing where to price the stocks and what the future looks
like. … The market is suddenly skeptical and concerned about
it,” said Jed ​Ellerbroek, a portfolio manager at Argent ⁠Capital
in St. Louis.
Some software companies added to recent losses amid worries that
rapidly advancing AI could disrupt industry incumbents.
Snowflake fell 4.6% and Datadog lost 3.3%.

“If you’ve got legacy software that’s old and clunky, you’re
a ripe target for AI. We’re a bit bearish on ‌software in
general, with the whole impetus of AI,” said Josh Chastant,
portfolio manager, public ‌investments at GuideStone Funds.

Investors selling AI-related stocks shifted into less
pricey companies that sat out the tech rally in recent years.
The S&P 500 value index ‍gained for a fifth straight
session, while the S&P 500 growth index dropped.
The S&P 500 declined 0.51% to end the session at 6,882.72
points.
The Nasdaq fell 1.51% to 22,904.58 points, while the Dow ‍Jones
Industrial Average rose 0.53% to 49,501.30 points.
Even as the S&P 500 lost ground, seven of the 11 S&P 500 sector
indexes rose, led by energy, up 2.25%, followed by a
1.8% gain in materials.
Volume on U.S. exchanges was heavy, with 24.6 billion shares
traded, compared to an average of 19.9 billion shares over the
previous 20 sessions.

Super Micro Computer’s shares jumped 13.8% after
the company raised its annual revenue forecast on sustained
demand for its AI-optimized servers as companies ramp up data
center capacity.

Limiting losses in the S&P 500, shares of the drugmaker Eli
Lilly rallied about 10% after the ⁠company forecast 2026
profit above Wall Street expectations.

The government’s closely watched jobs report for January has
been pushed back from its scheduled release on Friday due to ​a
four-day partial government shutdown that ended on Tuesday.

In the meantime, the ADP national employment report on
Wednesday ⁠showed that U.S. private payrolls increased less than
expected in January amid job losses in the professional and
business services, as well as manufacturing sectors.

Advancing issues outnumbered falling ones within the S&P
500 by a 2.6-to-one ratio.

The S&P 500 posted 93 new highs and 23 new lows; the
Nasdaq recorded 218 new highs and 318 new lows.

Published on February 5, 2026



Source link

UN warns of imminent financial collapse amid unpaid member fees

UN warns of imminent financial collapse amid unpaid member fees


UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has warned of an “imminent financial collapse” due to unpaid member fees and a budget rule requiring unspent funds to be returned.
| Photo Credit:
Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

U.N.
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres is sounding the alarm on U.N.
finances, warning that the world body is at risk of “imminent
financial collapse” due to unpaid fees and a budget rule that
forces it to return unspent funds.

Guterres has repeatedly spoken ‍about the U.N.’s worsening
liquidity crisis but this was his starkest warning yet, and it
came as the United States, its main contributor – and debtor –
is retreating from ​multilateralism on numerous fronts.

Here are some questions and answers about U.N. finances:

HOW MUCH IS OWED TO THE UNITED ‌NATIONS AND BY WHOM?

In a letter to member states last week, Guterres said there
was a record $1.57 billion in ​outstanding dues for the U.N.’s
regular budget, without naming the nations that owed them.

U.N. officials say more than 95 percent of what is owed to
the regular U.N. budget is owed by the United States – $2.19
billion by the start of February. The U.S. also owes another
$2.4 billion for current and past peace-keeping missions and
$43.6 million for U.N. tribunals.

On December 30, the U.N. General Assembly approved $3.45
billion for the regular U.N. budget for 2026, following weeks of
negotiations. This covers costs of running U.N. offices around
the world, including the headquarters in New York, staff
salaries, meetings and development and human rights work.

U.N. officials say the U.S. did not pay into the regular
budget last year and owes $827 million for that, ​as well as $767
million for 2026. Next in line were Venezuela and Mexico, owing
$38 million and $20 million respectively.

Contributions depend on ⁠economy size. The U.S. accounts for
22% of the regular budget, followed by China with 20%. Fees are
officially due by Feb. 8 and so far 41 states have paid for
2026, a U.N. document showed.

WHAT IS GUTERRES ASKING MEMBER STATES TO DO?

Without naming the United States, U.N. spokesperson Stephane
Dujarric said this week the U.N’s “cash-flow problem” could be
solved “if member ​states, who have an obligation to pay, pay.”

The crunch comes ⁠at a time when U.S. President Donald Trump
has launched a Board of Peace with himself as lifetime chair,
which some fear could undermine the United Nations, a body with
193 member states formed in the ashes of World War Two that
works to maintain international peace and security.

Under Trump, as well as refusing to make mandatory payments
to the U.N.’s regular and peacekeeping budgets, the U.S. has
slashed voluntary funding ‌to U.N. agencies with their own
budgets, and moved to exit U.N. organizations including the
World Health Organization. In December, the ‌U.N. appealed for a
2026 aid budget only half the size of what it had hoped for in
2025, acknowledging a plunge in donor funding at a time when
humanitarian needs have never been greater.

Guterres launched a reform task force ‍last year, UN80,
seeking to cut costs and improve efficiency. The approved 2026
regular budget is roughly $200 million higher than he proposed,
but about 7 per cent lower than the approved 2025 budget.

Guterres warned in his letter that the U.N. could run out of
cash by July and cited a “Kafkaesque” requirement for ‍it to
credit back hundreds of millions of dollars in unspent dues to
states each year even if it never received the money. U.N.
officials hope to overhaul this “bizarre” rule, which Guterres
has called “a race to bankruptcy.”

WHAT HAS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SAID?

Speaking to Politico on Sunday, Trump cast himself as the
savior of the U.N. but declined to say if the U.S. would pay up.

According to Politico, Trump said he was unaware the U.S.
was behind in its commitments but was sure he could “solve the
problem very easily” and get other countries to pay — if only
the U.N. would ask.

The White House and State Department did not respond when
asked if the U.S. will pay, or if Trump meant that other
countries should put up the money instead.

A senior State Department official did though say that “the
U.N. needs to get back to basics” and accused it of wasting
money.

“We have no interest in continuing ⁠to spend American tax
dollars on such waste, fraud and abuse,” the official said.

“The U.N. continues to pay its staff far more than for
comparable U.S. government positions, provide unacceptable
benefits and pensions, and increase the number of high-level
bureaucrats in New ​York – up over 30% – in the last two years
alone. The U.N. also spent $340 million just on meetings and
conferences last year.”

According to a draft U.N. ⁠budget document seen by Reuters in
September, U.N. cost-savings plans for next year envisaged far
smaller cuts to senior staff than to lower ranks.

It showed just two of 58 department head posts in the layer
of under-secretaries-general beneath Guterres, or 3%, would go,
compared to around 19% across the board and up to 28% for one
lower-ranking category, according to Reuters calculations.

A U.N. official said Guterres aimed to deliver on reform
while limiting the impact of cutbacks. If the U.S. did not pay,
“at the end of the day, meetings can’t ⁠be organized, work’s not
done, staff is not being paid,” the official said.

“Unlike a government, we can’t borrow money and we can’t
print money.”

Published on February 4, 2026



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp