Apple MacBook Neo bucks weak Q2 PC market, but bigger test awaits: Analysts

Apple MacBook Neo bucks weak Q2 PC market, but bigger test awaits: Analysts



Apple has emerged as the lone bright spot in an otherwise weak second quarter in the calendar year for the global PC industry. According to IDC’s Worldwide Quarterly PC Tracker, worldwide PC shipments fell 4.9 per cent year-on-year in the second quarter of 2026 to 68.2 million units, marking the first decline after nine consecutive quarters of growth.

 

Apple, however, bucked the trend, shipping 6.7 million Macs, up 10.1 per cent year-on-year, and capturing 9.9 per cent of the global market. Omdia’s Q2 tracker reached a similar conclusion using a slightly different methodology, estimating the overall market decline at 3.6 per cent while putting Apple’s growth at 15.9 per cent on shipments of 7.3 million units. Every other vendor in the top five — Lenovo, HP, Dell and Asus — posted either a decline or flat growth on both trackers.

 
 


Earlier IDC had linked Apple’s gains to the MacBook Neo, the company’s entry-level Mac laptop, which began shipping in March. To understand what is driving demand in India, and what the recent price increase could mean, Business Standard spoke with Bharath Shenoy, principal analyst, Personal Computing Devices, IDC.

 


Shenoy said the Neo’s momentum gathered pace after its mid-March launch and continued throughout the second quarter.

 


“The actual demand, the response was so good, they ramped up, and the overall Q2 shipment on the Neo itself was very huge,” he said.

 


He added that demand across both consumer and commercial segments was benefiting from the Neo, although it remained the primary growth driver. Speaking about India, Shenoy said Apple “had a great quarter” and that IDC is “definitely expecting a pretty good share gain, primarily in consumer and a little bit also in the commercial segment.”


MacBook Neo drove Apple’s Q2 performance


MacBook Neo’s trajectory through 2026 has unfolded in three phases. The first came in early June, when IDC forecast that global PC shipments would decline 11.3 per cent in 2026, with conditions worsening through the fourth quarter. Even then, IDC identified the Neo as a potential bright spot.

 


The pull-forward effect was visible in India as well. According to Q1 CY2026 data from IDC and Omdia, Apple shipped about 18,000 MacBook Neo units in India during the quarter, despite the laptop going on sale only in mid-March. Shipments began rising sharply from early April.

 


Navkendar Singh, associate vice-president at IDC, had told TechCrunch that demand for the Neo exceeded expectations in several countries, including India, where retailers struggled to secure enough inventory.


The second phase came with Apple’s price increase. In June, the company raised prices of iPads, Macs, MacBooks and home products, citing memory and storage cost pressures that Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook described to The Wall Street Journal as “unavoidable”. The MacBook Neo’s price in India increased by Rs 10,000, from Rs 69,900 to Rs 79,900.

 


The third phase is reflected in the Q2 data, which shows the Neo translating into market share gains on both IDC and Omdia trackers, even as the broader market contracted. Omdia attributed Apple’s growth to the Neo’s launch alongside “healthy underlying demand”.

 


Shenoy also pointed to Apple’s supply chain as a structural advantage.

 


“For MacBooks, the logistic supply chain is way better organised and way better sorted compared to most of the other brands,” he said, adding that competitors have faced processor and storage availability issues that Apple has largely avoided.


Why Apple’s price increase may have limited impact


Shenoy argued that Apple’s price increase should be viewed in the context of repeated increases by rival brands.

 


He said competing brands have raised prices every two to three months by around 10 to 15 per cent a time since late November, with further increases of 13 to 15 per cent expected in July.

 


“If you notice, Apple just had one round of price increase, around 15 to 20 per cent, whereas others have increased way more than what Apple has,” Shenoy said. “So, to be honest, we don’t see much impact on Apple sales.”

 


Omdia’s market tracking broadly supports this view, estimating that prices across comparable product categories have risen 20 to 40 per cent over the past year, reflecting repeated increases by Windows original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).


Shenoy also said several Apple retail outlets in India continue to sell MacBook Neo units at the pre-increase price while clearing existing inventory.

 


“They are still giving it at the old price in their outlets, Apple stores, and so on,” he said.


Combined with student discounts, he said, the Neo remains “a very attractive option right now”.

 


His conclusion was straightforward:

 


“We don’t see much impact for Apple, and we expect Apple to grow further in the coming quarters.”

 


He also noted that the Neo is now priced on par with, or in some cases below, rival Intel Core i5 and AMD Ryzen 5 laptops, whose prices have risen because of the same memory cost pressures, while still offering the appeal of a MacBook.


India PC market tells a different story


In June, IDC forecast that the global PC market would decline 11.3 per cent in 2026. Shenoy said that outlook does not necessarily apply to India.

 


He attributed the difference to the pandemic-era PC adoption cycle. Developed markets largely returned to pre-pandemic demand levels after economies reopened, whereas India’s lower PC penetration allowed demand to remain on a higher growth trajectory.

 


“The trend you see in the global market and the trend you see in the Indian market might differ,” he said.

 


Shenoy added that IDC’s Q2 India data were still being finalised at the time of the interview, but early indicators point to healthy market growth, with Apple among the gainers.

 


He also highlighted an important distinction between “sell-in” and “sell-out”. IDC’s shipment figures measure devices shipped by manufacturers to distributors and retailers, rather than actual consumer purchases. Higher sell-in does not necessarily translate into higher consumer demand, as it may reflect inventory build-up.

 


According to Shenoy, that is what is happening in the market now. Retailers are increasing inventories ahead of expected price increases by competing brands, boosting shipment numbers without necessarily indicating stronger end-user demand.


The real test comes next


Shenoy’s assessment is more optimistic than IDC’s earlier global outlook, which warned that the memory shortage differs from previous supply cycles and is unlikely to ease before 2028. It also contrasts with Omdia’s findings that business customers are delaying PC refresh cycles as higher component costs feed through the market.

 


In its report, Ishan Dutt, research director at Omdia, said market signals are “now pointing to a period of delayed demand as the true impact of the supply crunch sinks in”, with more than half of channel partners surveyed in June saying customers were postponing hardware refreshes until market conditions stabilise.

 


Both trends may play out simultaneously. The MacBook Neo’s value proposition — an entry-level Mac priced close to, or even below, rival laptops — appears intact despite the price increase, helped by retailers continuing to sell pre-increase inventory.

 


However, memory cost pressures remain unresolved, and the buffer of lower-priced inventory will eventually run out. The next quarter is likely to provide a clearer indication of whether Apple’s momentum in India can be sustained once the market fully absorbs the higher prices.



Source link

WhatsApp's reply on 'username' feature due today: IT Secretary S Krishnan

WhatsApp's reply on 'username' feature due today: IT Secretary S Krishnan



Meta-owned WhatsApp’s response to the government notice on the ‘username’ feature is due on Thursday, IT Secretary S Krishnan said.


Last Wednesday, the Centre issued a notice to Meta questioning the proposed username feature on WhatsApp, flagging concerns that it could materially increase online fraud, phishing, digital arrest scams, and impersonation attacks.


The username feature essentially allows people on the messaging platform to communicate without sharing their phone numbers.


The government had also directed the platform not to launch the feature until consultations on the issue are completed “to the satisfaction of the Government”.


Subsequently, WhatsApp had sought some more time to submit its response on the ‘username’ feature and had assured the government that it would not roll it out in India until discussions are complete.

 


“Today is the day when the reply is due,” Krishnan said on the sidelines of the CII GCC Business Summit, when asked about WhatsApp’s response to the ‘username’ feature.


On whether two other messaging platforms, Telegram and Signal, reverted on the notices sent to them on the ‘username’ feature, Krishnan said: “There is still a little more time, so the replies have not yet been received…we will examine this issue”.


Last Friday, a team from Meta met officials in the IT Ministry following the notice summoning them.


In the notice, the government asked Meta to explain why action shouldn’t be initiated under the IT Act and rules over WhatsApp’s new feature that may increase cybercrimes.


It also reminded Meta that WhatsApp, as a significant social media intermediary, is bound by due diligence obligations under the IT Act and rules.


A WhatsApp spokesperson, last week, said that the ability to use a username is not yet live and will roll out slowly later this year.


“To protect against impersonation, we’ve held the highest-profile names – think public figures, government entities, celebrities, verified Meta accounts – so they can only ever be claimed by their legitimate owners and lookalike derivatives of known names are held as well,” the spokesperson had said.


Users still require a phone number to use WhatsApp, the company had said and added that it has built multiple layers of defence against scams into usernames.


“Other users need to know the exact username to message you. We will limit how many new people an account can contact, block repeated attempts to guess someone’s username key, and have systems to detect and remove activity showing common impersonation and abuse patterns,” the company had said.


WhatsApp will show whether a first-time sender is a new account, contact, mutual group member or from another country before users respond.


“When the feature becomes available, and someone sends a message for the first time via your username, we will show you if they’re a new account, if they’re your contact, if you have groups in common, and if they’re based in a different country, so you can decide whether to respond,” WhatsApp had said.


After sending a notice to WhatsApp, the IT Ministry had shot off notices to Telegram and Signal too, raising questions on their existing username feature and asking how the platforms are addressing concerns related to fraud and impersonation risks. While WhatsApp has 50 crore users in India, Telegram’s reach is a fraction of that.


Notably, over the last few days, Meta and Telegram have also faced regulatory scrutiny on other issues.


While the government issued a stern notice on Meta on child sexual abuse material in Instagram ads on Saturday, Telegram was served a notice directing it to crack down on the “widespread dissemination” of pirated films, OTT content and other audio-visual material through its platform.



Source link

Why OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are funding startups with AI credits

Why OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are funding startups with AI credits



OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are giving away free AI computing credits worth hundreds of thousands, and in some cases millions, of dollars to startups across the globe, a report by the Wall Street Journal said. The offers reportedly include access to AI models, application programming interfaces (APIs), cloud infrastructure and engineering support that startups would otherwise have to pay for.

 


According to the report, some startups backed by Y Combinator have received credit packages worth up to $3 million from multiple providers, an amount comparable to a seed funding round.

 


It also said some founders have been able to negotiate better offers by playing AI companies against one another, while others have delayed fundraising because the credits reduced their operating costs.

 
 


According to the report, competition has intensified in recent months after OpenAI revised its startup programme to offer $500,000 in free credits without requiring equity, while startups can opt to receive an additional $1.5 million in credits in exchange for equity. Anthropic, meanwhile, increased its offer for Y Combinator startups from $30,000 to $500,000.


A new version of the cloud-credit playbook


The strategy resembles the cloud-computing race of the past decade, when Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud competed for startups by offering free cloud credits, the report said.

 


This time, however, the competition centres on AI inference, API usage and access to foundation models.

 


Rather than relying only on model performance, AI companies are trying to persuade startups to build products on their platforms from the outset. The expectation is that companies using their models today could become long-term enterprise customers as they grow, it said.


Lower costs today, paying customers tomorrow


For startups, the credits can majorly reduce operating costs. Building AI applications requires continuous spending on model access and computing power. Free credits allow founders to lower infrastructure expenses, preserve cash and redirect funds toward hiring and product development.

 


In some cases, the support can also extend a startup’s financial runway by reducing monthly spending.

 


The Wall Street Journal report said that for AI companies, the credits also represent a customer acquisition strategy. Simply put, instead of prioritising immediate revenue, providers are absorbing upfront costs in the hope that startups will continue using their platforms after the credits expire.

 


Another advantage lies in platform stickiness. Once startups integrate a provider’s APIs and workflows into their products, switching to another platform may require changes to applications, testing and internal systems, making early adoption valuable, the report said.


As providers spend more, users look to spend less


The competition comes as businesses become increasingly conscious of AI-related expenses. According to a report, Tesla has introduced a weekly spending cap of $200 per employee on third-party AI tools, with any higher expenditure requiring managerial approval.

 


The policy took effect on July 6 after software engineers were reportedly consuming thousands of dollars’ worth of AI tokens each week.

 


The contrasting strategies show that while AI companies are subsidising AI usage to attract startups and developers, businesses deploying these tools at scale are looking for ways to keep computing costs under control.

 


The development also suggests that as AI adoption gathers pace, companies are also racing to get startups to build on their platforms, hoping they will remain customers as they grow.



Source link

Will await Meta's formal reply & accordingly take a view: IT secretary on CSEAM notice

Will await Meta's formal reply & accordingly take a view: IT secretary on CSEAM notice



The government will await Meta’s formal reply to notice served over Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material (CSEAM) in paid advertisements on Instagram, IT Secretary S Krishnan said on Thursday, adding that a view will be taken basis the response given by the social media company.


The government had issued notice to Meta on Saturday over the issue, with Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ordering Instagram to disable all ads and content promoting and facilitating access to CSEAM.


IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw had directed MeitY officials to summon Meta over Instagram ads allegedly promoting child sexual abuse material; the ministry demanded an explanation and information from the company on action that had been taken.

 


Within days of the notice, Meta published a blog outlining its efforts to combat child sexual abuse material across its apps, highlighting AI-powered detection and large-scale enforcement actions. It also promised to continue investment in technology and resources to keep young people safe and strengthen its ad review processes.


In the blog published on Tuesday, the company termed child exploitation a “horrific crime” and asserted that it works aggressively every day to fight such abuse, on and off its platforms.


Asked about the IT Ministry’s view on Meta’s stance, Krishnan – speaking on the sidelines of CII GCC Business Summit – said: “We will await the formal response to the notice that we have issued, and thereafter we will take a view based on what the response is.” 
The regulatory scrutiny from the government comes amid a BBC report that alleged Meta’s recommendation algorithm had been promoting videos containing child sexual abuse material, exposing serious gaps in the safeguards.


The BBC investigation had also allegedly found advertisements of this nature appearing on Facebook and Instagram, despite Meta’s advertising policies explicitly prohibiting nudity and sexually explicit content.


Instagram is alleged to have shown paid advertisements with terms like ‘rape video’ and ‘child video’, which directed users to Telegram channels where such content was reportedly on sale.


In Tuesday’s blog post, Meta said its advertising review process combines automated systems with human reviewers to detect and remove policy-violating ads, while acknowledging that no system can catch every violation.


Ads are screened before they run and remain subject to continuous review and re-review, with users also able to report suspected violations, according to the company.


“This work is ongoing. Our teams are constantly improving our defences — developing new technology, blocking violating links, and sharing intelligence across the industry — but we know there is more to do. We will continue investing in every resource needed to keep young people safe, strengthen our ad review processes, and work with law enforcement to hold criminals accountable,” Meta had said.


Meta detailed the company’s ongoing efforts to combat child exploitation across its apps, highlighting AI-powered detection tools, its clearly laid-out policies against child nudity, abuse, and exploitation, and the large-scale enforcement action.


“We’re aware of recent news reports about Instagram ads in India that violated our policies against child exploitation. And we want to be clear: we take these concerns seriously, we never want this content on our platforms, and we’re committed to improving our efforts to combat it,” it noted.


Meta said it was categorically inaccurate to suggest that it deliberately targets ads featuring children to people based on an inappropriate interest.


“Quite the opposite; we use technology to identify accounts that have shown potentially suspicious activity related to children, and we automatically removed over four million of these accounts last year,” Meta said.


Meta said it has strengthened AI-powered enforcement against child exploitation, with newer systems covering languages spoken by 98 per cent people online.


The company said last year it had removed over four million suspicious accounts and 36 million pieces of child exploitation content globally. In India, AI tools helped remove 1,60,000 accounts in the past six months for posting suspicious links linked to exploitative activity, said the Menlo Park, California-headquartered technology giant which owns popular social media platforms Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.



Source link

India must use AI to move GCCs up value chain, says CEA Nageswaran

India must use AI to move GCCs up value chain, says CEA Nageswaran



Artificial intelligence (AI) poses a “real threat” to global capability centres (GCCs) built around routine, repetitive work, but India should use the technology to move these centres up the value chain, Chief Economic Adviser (CEA) V Anantha Nageswaran said on Thursday.

 


“If a centre’s value rests only on doing simple tasks at low cost, then that value is under real threat. We should not pretend otherwise,” Nageswaran said while addressing the Confederation of Indian Industry’s GCC Summit 2026.

 


The centres that fail to adapt would suffer, while those moving up the value chain would thrive, he said. “The risk is real, but it is not destiny,” he added.

 
 


“A country that treats a powerful technology as fate will be shaped by it. A country that treats it as a tool will shape it instead. India must be firmly in the second group,” Nageswaran said. “Not passive recipients of what the technology does to us, but active authors of what we do with it.”

 


Highlighting the evolution of India’s GCC ecosystem, the CEA said multinational companies initially came to India for lower costs but stayed because of the country’s capabilities.

 


“What began as support became engineering. What began as engineering became product. What began as a back office became, in many firms, the place where global decisions are now made,” he said.

 


India, which had only a handful of back offices two decades ago, now hosts more than 2,000 GCCs employing over 2 million professionals, generating more than $64 billion in revenue and contributing around 2 per cent to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), he said.

 


Around half of the world’s GCCs are now located in India, Nageswaran added.



Source link

Swift launches blockchain platform for 24×7 cross-border payments

Swift launches blockchain platform for 24×7 cross-border payments



By Anna Irrera

 


Swift, whose messaging system is used by banks for millions of transactions a day, said a blockchain-based network designed to facilitate round-the-clock money transfers across borders is ready for initial use.  


The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication said Thursday that 17 banks from around the world are preparing to pilot live transactions using tokenised deposits on its new system. Tokenised deposits are digital representations of customers’ account balances that can be transferred over blockchain rails. 

 


Swift’s ledger allows banks to move funds for customers outside traditional business hours, including at nights and on weekends, before completing the final settlement through existing systems, according to a statement. Banks taking part in initial trials include HSBC Holdings Plc, Citigroup Inc., Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Standard Chartered Plc and UBS Group AG, Swift said. 

 
 


Banks and market infrastructure providers have been testing blockchain-based systems for years, but few projects have achieved broad commercial adoption. One challenge has been interoperability, as many institutions built their own platforms that didn’t always work with others’. 

 


The financial and crypto worlds are moving to address that. Last week, more than 100 financial companies said they had linked up to introduce a joint stablecoin — a type of token pegged to an asset like the dollar and increasingly used for payments. 

 


In June, a group of large banks in the US announced plans for a shared network run by The Clearing House that would connect tokenised bank deposits with traditional payment systems. 

 


Swift first unveiled plans for its blockchain-based system in September. At the time, it said the ultimate goal was to allow for transactions involving various kinds of digital assets, such as stablecoins or other tokenised assets. 

 


As a global financial artery, Swift delivers secure messages among 11,500 banks and financial institutions in over 200 countries and territories, directing trillions of dollars in transactions, according to the release.



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp