AC companies plan cool designs for warming world, but high costs a hurdle

AC companies plan cool designs for warming world, but high costs a hurdle



When temperatures climbed north of 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in Seville during this summer’s crushing heatwave in Europe, air conditioning use jumped 23% in the southern Spanish city compared to how many hours ACs ran during the same period in 2022.


Lisbon’s average AC use, too, went up by about 41% in mid-June to mid-July, compared with the same period the previous year, according to data analysis from Sensibo, a company which specializes in smart devices that can control ACs remotely to cut energy use.


While cooling technologies can save lives during deadly heat, they also threaten to worsen the climate crisis.


The energy used in cooling and refrigerants accounts for about 7% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and demand could more than triple by 2050, according to the International Energy Agency.


“We’ve got a big problem,” said Lily Riahi, head of the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Cool Coalition. “Without strong policy actions, emissions will skyrocket.”


At this year’s U.N. climate summit, governments and companies are grappling with the problem by discussing energy efficiency and reining in high-polluting refrigerants.


Dozens of countries are backing a COP28 pledge to reduce cooling-related emissions by at least 68% by 2050 from 2022 levels.


But industry experts say governments need to offer incentives for companies to bring sustainable AC technologies to market and scale up.


Even making today’s most efficient units more affordable could help, she said.


“There is super efficient equipment available today that is not being tapped into,” Riahi said. “We need to create demand with policy.”


COOL DESIGN


AC companies have been developing better products for years, with units using less power and releasing fewer hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), potent greenhouse gases.


One way conventional ACs are so energy intensive is through processes for eliminating humidity.


Conventional ACs transfer heat outside by converting gas refrigerants to liquid and back again, which generates cooling.


Removing humidity requires cooling air to the point at which water vapour becomes a liquid to be drained. This inability to get rid of humidity without first cooling the air makes conventional ACs less efficient.


“Humidity is what drives comfort, even more than temperature,” said Sorin Grama, CEO of the U.S. startup Transaera. “Current air conditioners suck when it comes to removing humidity.”


Grama co-founded Transaera in 2018 based on novel cooling materials discovered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


The company’s AC prototype uses these materials to dry out air, aiming to produce fewer emissions than traditional ACs.


Two major AC companies, Gree Electric and Daikin, won a 2021 competition supported by the Indian government and nonprofits to build a better air conditioner.


Like Transaera, the winning prototypes focused on removing humidity and achieving a climate impact five times lower than available ACs.


Two years later, there are no plans to bring those winning prototypes to market. While Gree hopes soon to offer a scaled-back model, Daikin said material costs and supply chain issues were still obstacles.


“It’s not economically feasible,” said Miki Yamanaka, department manager of Daikin’s Global Environment Center.


MARKETS OF SCALE


Industry experts say policies and incentives are needed to lower consumer costs. More than 1 billion people living in warm climates still lack access to cooling, according to nonprofit Sustainable Energy for All.


“Cooling is more like a right than a luxury,” said Larissa Gross of climate think tank E3G.


UNEP’s Riahi said governments can consider implementing stricter energy performance standards, clearer efficiency labelling, subsidies or bulk procurement to stimulate demand and lower costs.


Meanwhile, import tariffs can help prevent inefficient, second-hand models being resold in developing countries.


Gree is not yet releasing commercial models that replicate its super-efficient prototype. Market research suggested people were not willing to pay as much as 150% more, said thermal engineer Baolong Wang of Tsinghua University in Beijing who worked with Gree on its prototype.


“Some countries like Indonesia, the economics are not so developed, but they need this kind of cooling,” Wang said. “You have to focus on affordable cooling”.


The company instead plans to soon market a similar model but for drier conditions in the Middle East. This model uses the prototype’s high-efficiency air compressor, but switches to a cheaper refrigerant with higher emissions potential than the prototype’s R152a refrigerant, he said.


Wang said Gree was also working on a model for the more humid Indian market.


Another startup from Britain called Barocal is also working on improving AC technology, with its initial prototype using solid refrigerants instead of climate-polluting gases.


“We’ve been working hard on a second generation of prototypes that are performing well in all metrics – good cooling power and efficiency,” said Barocal founder Xavier Moya, a material physics researcher at the University of Cambridge.


The startup Transaera, which last year received $4.5 million in seed funding from U.S. company Carrier’s venture capital group, aims to get a product to market by 2025.


“This industry goes slow,” Grama said. “You have to generate supply chains and partnerships … We have to work within the confines of a 100-year-old industry changing its direction.”


___


For daily comprehensive coverage on COP28 in your inbox, sign up for the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter here.


 


(Reporting by Gloria Dickie; Editing by Katy Daigle, Simon Jessop and Josie Kao)

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Larry Page, Elon Musk on opposite sides in debate over risks of AI

Larry Page, Elon Musk on opposite sides in debate over risks of AI



By Cade Metz, Karen Weise, Nico Grant & Mike Isaac


Elon Musk celebrated his 44th birthday in July 2015 at a three-day party thrown by his wife at a California wine country resort dotted with cabins. 




This was years before Twitter became X and Tesla had a profitable year. Larry Page, a party guest, was still the chief executive of Google. And artificial intelligence (AI) had pierced the public consciousness only a few years before, when it was used to identify cats on YouTube — with 16 percent accuracy. AI was the big topic of conversation back then. The tone soon turned contentious as the two debated whether AI would ultimately elevate humanity or destroy it.




As the discussion stretched into the chilly hours, it grew intense. Page described his vision of a digital utopia in a whisper. Humans would eventually merge with artificially intelligent machines, he said. One day there would be many kinds of intelligence competing for resources, and the best would win. If that happens, Musk said, we’re doomed. The machines will destroy humanity.




With a rasp of frustration, Page insisted his utopia should be pursued. Finally he called Musk a “specieist,” a person who favors humans over the digital life-forms of the future. That insult, Musk said later, was “the last straw.”




But eight years later, the argument between the two men seems prescient. The question of whether AI will elevate the world or destroy it — or at least inflict grave damage — has framed an ongoing debate. That debate has pitted some of the world’s richest men against one another: Musk, Page, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, the tech investor Peter Thiel, Satya Nadella of Microsoft and Sam Altman of OpenAI. All have fought for a piece of the business — which one day could be worth trillions of dollars — and the power to shape it. At the heart of this competition is a brain-stretching paradox. The people who say they are most worried about AI are among the most determined to create it and enjoy its riches. They have justified their ambition with their strong belief that they alone can keep AI from endangering Earth.




Musk and Page stopped speaking soon after the party that summer. A few weeks later, Musk dined with Sam Altman, who was then running a tech incubator, and several researchers in a private room at the Rosewood hotel in Menlo Park, a favored deal-making spot close to the venture capital offices of Sand Hill Road. That dinner led to the creation of OpenAI later in the year. Backed by hundreds of millions of dollars from Musk and other funders, the lab promised to protect the world from Page’s vision. OpenAI is valued at more than $80 billion, though Musk and Altman’s partnership didn’t make it. The two have since stopped speaking.




“There is disagreement, mistrust, egos,” Altman said. “The closer people are to being pointed in the same direction, the more contentious the disagreements are. You see this in sects and religious orders. There are bitter fights between the closest people.”




Last month, that infighting came to OpenAI’s boardroom. Rebel board members tried to force out Altman because, they believed, they could no longer trust him to build AI that would benefit humanity. Over five chaotic days OpenAI looked as if it were going to fall apart, until the board — pressured by giant investors and employees who threatened to follow Altman out the door — backed down. The drama inside OpenAI gave the world its first glimpse of the bitter feuds among those who will determine the future of AI. But years before OpenAI’s near meltdown, there was a little-publicised but ferocious competition in Silicon Valley for control of the technology that is now quickly reshaping the world.




©2023 The New York Times News Service



Source link

Spanish newspaper association files suit against Meta over ad practices

Spanish newspaper association files suit against Meta over ad practices



A Spanish association representing more than 80 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against Facebook parent Meta accusing it of unfair competition in online advertising by allegedly ignoring European Union rules on data protection.


In a statement, the Information Media Association said it is demanding 550 million euros (USD 600 million) from the social media giant. The association represents dozens of newspapers including Spain’s principal dailies El Pas, El Mundo, ABC and La Vanguardia.


The association accuses Meta of systematic and massive non-compliance with EU data protection regulations between May 2018, when they took force, and July 2023.


It said Meta has repeatedly ignored the requirement that citizens give their consent to the use of their data for advertising profiling.


The company declined to comment, saying it hadn’t seen the legal papers.


Meta’s Facebook and Instagram platforms have long used behavioral advertising to make money. The practice involves tracking individual online behaviour such as web browsing habits, mouse clicks and app usage, then using that data to build profiles for targeting ads to users.


But court rulings have eroded Meta’s ability to justify its methods under the EU’s data privacy regulations. In July, the EU’s top court ruled the company can’t force users in the 27-nation bloc to agree to personalized ads, saying users need to freely give their consent. Meta responded by offering ad-free versions of Facebook and Instagram for European users for a monthly fee.


The Spanish association said the use of personal data of users of Meta platforms, tracked without their consent, allowed the US company to offer advertising space based on an illegitimately obtained competitive advantage, indirectly threatening the livelihood of Spanish media.


It called on advertisers in the public and private sectors to entrust their advertising campaigns to safe, reliable and responsible media, respectful of the rights of citizens and committed to promoting democratic quality in Spain.


The time has come to put an end to the behaviour of technology companies that can afford to pay million-dollar penalties to continue failing to comply with regulations, destroying the market in which we operate and making the illegitimately obtained income their own, said Irene Lanzaco, director general of the association.


The case was filed at Madrid’s mercantile courts.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Amazon to introduce advanced coding & AI modules in 100 Karnataka schools

Amazon to introduce advanced coding & AI modules in 100 Karnataka schools



Amazon.in on Monday announced the expansion of its Amazon Future Engineer (AFE) program to introduce advanced coding and artificial intelligence (AI) modules in 100 Karnataka Residential Educational Institutions Society (KREIS) schools.


The company said in a statement it will also provide digital infrastructure enhancements for 30 KREIS schools.


“This expansion will impact over 13,000 students in grades six to eight across 30 districts of Karnataka,” it said.


The expanded module will enable students to develop complex computer applications incorporating advanced programming concepts like control conditions, variables, and functions, the company said.


“Additionally, through project-based learning, students will also be introduced to the basics of AI with a further understanding of its relevance, future possibilities, and impact on their lives and the world around them,” the statement added.


This programme will complement the current courses in coding, logical sequencing, learning loops, and block programming offered to KREIS schools under the Amazon Future Engineer programme, it was stated.


The 20-hour module is designed to take into account the current exposure of students to computer science and coding. Class six students will be taught the fundamentals of block programming, while seventh and eighth graders will be introduced to advanced programming and the basics of AI, the statement added.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Japan's TDK Corp to manufacture iPhone battery cells in India: MoS IT

Japan's TDK Corp to manufacture iPhone battery cells in India: MoS IT



Japanese electronic parts maker TDK Corp will manufacture lithium ion (li-ion) battery cells for Apple iPhones in India, a minister said on Monday.


Apple has been touting India as its next big growth driver as it looks to move some production away from China.


It began assembling iPhones in the country in 2017 through Wistron and later Foxconn, and has a total of 14 suppliers in India.


TDK will set up a manufacturing facility in the northern state of Haryana, creating several thousand new jobs, Deputy Minister for Information Technology Rajeev Chandrasekhar said on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.


The news was first reported by Business Standard on Sunday.


Cells manufactured at the facility will be supplied to Apple’s li-ion battery assembler Sunwoda Electronics, the report added.


Apple and TDK Corp did not immediately reply to Reuters’ request for comment.


 


(This story has been corrected to mention that the minister said TDK will create several thousand jobs, not around 1,000 jobs, in paragraph 4)


 


(Reporting by Manvi Pant in Bengaluru; Editing by Varun H K)

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Samsung to launch AI-powered Galaxy Book 4 notebooks this month: Report

Samsung to launch AI-powered Galaxy Book 4 notebooks this month: Report


Representative Image: Samsung Galaxy Book3 laptops


Samsung will reportedly unveil its AI-powered Galaxy Book 4 lineup on December 15. According to a report from South Korean news outlet Yonhap news, Samsung will announce its next-generation notebook just a day after Intel launches its Meteor Lake processors with built-in Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for on-device AI.


The Galaxy Book 4 series is expected to use NPU cores on Intel’s next-gen SoC coupled with Samsung’s in-house generative artificial intelligence model- Gauss to bring on-device AI capabilities to laptops for the first time.


Samsung unveiled its own AI model at the company’s AI Forum last month. The AI model encompasses Gauss language model, Gauss Code, and Gauss generative image model. 


Samsung said Gauss is a language model that is capable of generating text, composing emails, editing and summarising documents, and translating languages. On the other hand, the Gauss code and coding assistant are based on the Gauss language and are optimised for in-house software development.


Speaking about multi-modal support, Samsung said its Gauss Image is a generative image model that is capable of generating and editing creative images and would have the feature for upscaling low-resolution images.


Galaxy Book 4 Series: Expected specs


According to reports, The Galaxy Book 4 laptop is expected to feature the upcoming Intel Core Ultra 7 155H processor. Meanwhile, the more expensive Galaxy Book 4 Ultra could get a Core Ultra 9 185H processor under the hood. For graphics, the notebooks might sport NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 GPU on select models.


The Galaxy Book 4 series will likely get up to 32 GB of RAM and up to 1TB of on-board storage with varying configurations across the lineup.


The next generation of Galaxy Book notebooks will reportedly come with Samsung’s homegrown touch display with 2880×1800 resolution and up to 120Hz refresh rate.

First Published: Dec 04 2023 | 3:29 PM IST



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp