Despite big start-up push, J&K funds only 18 ventures in three years

Despite big start-up push, J&K funds only 18 ventures in three years


No units were established under other central and Union Territory schemes such as the Youth Start-Up Loan Scheme (YSSL), Seed Capital Fund Scheme (SCFS), and the National Minorities Development and Finance Corporation (NMDFC) in Jammu and Kashmir during the last three years
| Photo Credit:
Getty Images

 

Srinagar  

The Jammu and Kashmir government has said only 18 start-ups have received seed capital support in the Union Territory over the past three financial years, with funding released only in the current fiscal under the Jammu and Kashmir Entrepreneurship Development Institute (JKEDI).

The government on Tuesday informed the Legislative Assembly said that no seed capital was provided to start-ups in 2023–24 and 2024–25 under JKEDI or any other government-supported mechanism. Funding was released only in 2025–26, when ₹3.6 crore was sanctioned in favour of 18 start-ups, at ₹20 lakh per start-up.

The total seed capital released during the period stands at ₹9 crore, calculated at ₹5 lakh per start-up, the government said in reply to a un-starred question by MLA Shabir Ahmad Kullay, adding that all 18 start-ups were funded in the current financial year. Officials said the sanctioned assistance was aimed at early-stage ventures with scalable business models, though details of sector-wise distribution were not shared.

The government also informed the House that no units were established under other central and Union Territory schemes such as the Youth Start-Up Loan Scheme (YSSL), Seed Capital Fund Scheme (SCFS), and the National Minorities Development and Finance Corporation (NMDFC) in Jammu and Kashmir during the last three years.

The disclosure comes at a time when the administration has been projecting entrepreneurship and start-ups as key drivers of employment generation in the Union Territory. 

Significant gap

However, the figures highlight a significant gap between policy intent and on-ground implementation, particularly in terms of financial support to new ventures.

Start-up founders and industry observers have repeatedly flagged delays in funding, procedural bottlenecks, and limited outreach of existing schemes as major hurdles for aspiring entrepreneurs in the region.

The government, however, maintains that efforts are underway to strengthen the start-up ecosystem and expand institutional support in the coming years.

Officials said the administration was reviewing existing startup schemes to streamline approval processes and improve disbursal timelines. 

“Steps were being taken  to improve coordination between financial institutions and implementing agencies to ensure wider coverage and more effective support for early-stage entrepreneurs in the region”, said the officials. 

Published on February 11, 2026



Source link

SBI’s market cap surges past TCS; becomes fourth most valuable company

SBI’s market cap surges past TCS; becomes fourth most valuable company


Over a one-year period SBI’s shares have appreciated 61.6 cent and over a five-year time frame, were up over 3 times, compared to Nifty50’s 71 per cent returns. 

Government-owned lender State Bank of India (SBI) became the country’s fourth most valuable company, its market capitalisation surpassing that of Tata Consultancy Services, and hitting ₹10.9 lakh crore.

The shares of the bank rose 3.2 per cent on Wednesday with over 2.9 crore shares being traded.

Its market cap has been steadily rising and in the current fiscal so far has increased 58 per cent. Over the same period TCS’ market cap has fallen 17.8 per cent to ₹10.5 lakh crore.

One-year gains

Over a one-year period SBI’s shares have appreciated 61.6 cent and over a five-year time frame, were up over 3 times, compared to Nifty50’s 71 per cent returns.

The stock has got a boost from its strong quarterly performance, reporting a 24 per cent rise in net profit led by good loan growth, while its asset quality has remained stable.

Its gross advances rose 15 per cent and it expects to end the year with 14-15 per cent growth in credit. Slippages during the quarter were lower compared to the second quarter while recoveries were better.

In contrast, TCS has been an underperformer and over a one-year time period has fallen 26.6 per cent.

Slower deal-making in the US, the largest market for Indian IT companies, has had an impact on its performance and this has been an overhang on the company for several quarters now.

Mega deals are now fewer than they were before and revenue visibility is still dependent on the US; headwinds such as restrictions on H1b visas, are still playing out. Client spends are still tightly controlled and the company has now pivoted to shorter-cycle, AI-led work to boost revenue.

The most valuable company are Reliance Industries, followed by HDFC Bank and Bharti Airtel.

Published on February 11, 2026



Source link

Legacy created over last six years will be carried forward by successor: Yes Bank CEO

Legacy created over last six years will be carried forward by successor: Yes Bank CEO


The six years of legacy created after the reconstruction of Yes Bank in 2020 will be carried forward by Vinay Tonse, who is set to take over as the private lender’s MD and CEO in April. The bank’s current chief Prashant Kumar shared how the bank was brought back from the brink in 2020, his guidance for his successor and the retail segment’s profitability.

What are your next plans after the tenure ends as Yes Bank chief in April?

Change is the only constant. I never plan for the future. If anything comes at a later point, we will see it then. I have completed 42 years as a banker with SBI and Yes Bank. It is a very long time. I would live a happy retired life

What would be your guidance to your successor?

I feel very happy that I am passing on the baton to a very competent person who has vast experience at SBI. And it gives me lot of comfort that the legacy created over last six years will be carried forward. No one should give strategic business guidance to anyone. Every leader needs to have the freedom to chart down the bank’s future trajectory. From a risk-taking perspective, the banking sector has shown that organisations that have patience and don’t take aggressive bets move in the positive direction. Our performance has shown consistent improvement each quarter. And people who take certain aggressive calls, I am not naming any banks, but there are lenders who in the past posted double our profits, but today, they post only 40-50 per cent of our profits. You are dealing with public money and must not take undue, aggressive risk. Also, while managing multiple stakeholders, being honest, transparent and clear is the right way, and with Vinay’s term at SBI, this would never be an issue.

You led Yes Bank after the RBI notified the bank’s reconstruction scheme in 2020. How have things changed since then when depositors were panicking and withdrawing funds en masse?

When I joined six years ago, we declared the results for December quarter in 2019. We reported a loss of over ₹18,000 crore, which I think was the highest loss for any bank. That only shows the size of problem. In the December 2025 quarter, exactly six years since then, the bank showed a profit of almost ₹1,000 crore, which is very near to 1 per cent RoA. At that point of time, deposits stood at around ₹1 lakh crore, now the base stands at ₹3 lakh crore, almost three times growth. Gross NPA ratio at that point was 18 per cent, now it is at 1.5 per cent. Capital adequacy ratio was then less than 1 per cent, now it is around 13 per cent. It was very difficult back then to assess how to resolve such a large problem as there was no particular format. This was the first-of-its-kind experiment, and we have been able to revive the bank as independent entity without merging it with other lender. SBI and other banks that supported us got good investment returns, and as we brought in world’s 10th largest lender SMBC as a major investor, it showed the confidence in franchise that has been created in the last six years.

Retail segment profitability has been a pain point, though…

When we started a new journey after reconstruction, the retail segment was contributing very little to the bank’s overall business and profitability. So, we had to first make substantial investments to build retail book and only then returns follow. As a strategy, we had no choice but to grow retail book as all banks do. We invested in new branches, hiring people and building tech. We were moving in right decision, but in FY24, the entire industry suffered an adverse credit cycle, with higher slippages in unsecured loan segments.

If anyone compares us with a matured bank with more income streams, established large retail businesses, then maybe they won’t see a decline in profitability, but since we were in the phase of building the retail book as this credit cycle came quite early in that phase of investment, that is the only reason why retail wasn’t showing profits. If you exclude credit cost, retail was always profitable for the bank from operating part. Today, retail book has broken even. People can appreciate or criticise things, but if you do it without perspective, then you may arrive at a wrong inference.



Source link

Mis-selling: Banks to refund, compensate customers, says RBI

Mis-selling: Banks to refund, compensate customers, says RBI


Banks can neither resort to dark patterns such as fake countdown timers to force quick decisions nor include additional items such as products/services, payments to charity or donation at the time of checkout from a platform, without the consent of the user
| Photo Credit:

The RBI on Wednesday issued comprehensive draft instructions on advertising, marketing and sales of financial products and services for banks to prevent mis-selling and compulsory bundling of financial products. Further, to ensure customers understood the financial product they bought, banks will have to seek customer feedback within 30 days of sale, per the Draft Reserve Bank of India (Commercial Banks – Responsible Business Conduct) Amendment Directions, 2026, which will come into effect on July 1.

If mis-selling is established, banks have to refund the entire amount paid by the customer for purchase of the product/service. They have to also compensate customers for any loss arising due to mis-selling. Before a financial product/service is marketed/sold to a particular customer, its suitability and appropriateness for the customer should be determined by the bank.

This will be based on an analysis of the features, risk-return attributes, time horizon, complexity, fee structure vis-à-vis the customer’s age, income, level of financial literacy and risk tolerance. Banks have to ensure that their policies and practices neither create incentives for mis-selling nor encourage employees / DSAs (Direct Selling Agents) to push the sale of products / services.

Also, banks can neither resort to dark patterns such as fake countdown timers to force quick decisions nor include additional items such as products/services, payments to charity or donation at the time of checkout from a platform, without the consent of the user.

Banks have been made accountable for third parties they engage with. For the benefit of customers, any agent of the bank, or representative of a third party, who is present within the bank’s premises for the sale of the bank’s own or third-party product/service, should be distinguishable from the employees of the bank, including clear on person identification.

code of conduct

A bank, based on the instructions mentioned in these Directions, shall put in place a code of conduct for marketing and sales of financial products/services, which shall be applicable to the bank’s own employees as well as DSAs / DMAs (direct marketing agents).

Meanwhile, the central bank said a bank can only deal with regulated financial products and services in which a bank is permitted to deal with. A bank may, at its option, act as an insurance broker departmentally, subject to the conditions. per Draft Reserve Bank of India (Commercial Banks – Undertaking of Financial Services) Amendment Directions, 2026, which will come into effect from April 1.

Banks may undertake agency business on fee basis without any risk participation. This shall be explicitly disclosed upfront to the customers. They have to ensure that the third-party product and service providers (TPPSP), whose products are being sold, have robust customer grievance redressal arrangements in place. The bank may facilitate the redressal of grievances.

Banks may refer their customers to a TPPSP only for regulated financial products and services (except insurance) subject to the conditions.

They may collect only a one-time fee from the TPPSP at the point of referring its customers. No other stream of income/ fee, or commission in any form should be collected by the bank under the referral arrangement.

Published on February 11, 2026



Source link

NIIF exits from Ather Energy throuh block deals

NIIF exits from Ather Energy throuh block deals


Electric two-wheeler maker a few days back reported a sharp improvement in its financial performance for the December quarter
| Photo Credit:
FRANCIS MASCARENHAS

National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF) on Wednesday exited from Ather Energy by offloading its entire 1.92 per cent stake in Ather Energy through block deals on the BSE and the National Stock Exchange.

It sold nearly 32.79 lakh shares of EV auto maker on the NSE and 40.54 lakh shares on the BSE at ₹710 each.

At the end of the December quarter, the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund II had held 1.92 per cent stake in the company.

NIIF is a sovereign-linked alternative asset manager anchored by the Government of India.

However, both the exchanges did not disclose the buyer details.

The stock on Wednesday closed at ₹715.95, down 1.53 per cent on the BSE.

Electric two-wheeler maker a few days back reported a sharp improvement in its financial performance for the December quarter. The company’s loss for Q3 FY26 fell 57 per cent year-on-year to ₹84.6 crore from ₹197.5 crore in the year-ago period, and narrowed sequentially from ₹154.1 crore in the September quarter, reflecting improving operating leverage on higher volumes, stronger pricing and rising software-led revenues.

Published on February 11, 2026



Source link

Uranium eases from over 0/lb as analysts differ on its prospects for 2026

Uranium eases from over $100/lb as analysts differ on its prospects for 2026


Radioactive heavy metal uranium soared over $100 a pound last month due to supply disruption, but analysts are divided on the prospects for the critical mineral for 2026. 

In the long-term, the metal’s prospects are promising with the emergence of structural deficit. Swiss multinational financial services firm UBS has forecast a 3 per cent growth in nuclear reactor demand over the next few years, from 2 per cent during 2020-25. 

Price outlook

“We think spot prices for uranium hit a ceiling in January 2026 after rallying more than 25 per cent to highs above $100/lb. In our view, the uranium market is only in a minor deficit currently, with supply from Central Asia, Canada and Namibia likely to support demand for the next 2-3 years,” said research agency BMI, a unit of Fitch Solution.

Australia’s Office of the Chief Economist (AOCE), in its forecast to 2028, sees spot prices rising from $73 a pound in 2025 to an average of $91 in 2027 as demand growth continues to outpace supply. 

Vancouver-based global investment bank Canaccord Genuity sees uranium prices at $110 in the long term, while Swiss multinational investment bank UBS has forecast demand for nuclear reactors at 3 per cent

Currently, uranium is ruling at $82 a pound, after a fresh bout of increase in supply outweighing demand. 

Supply disruption

BMI said spot prices, which track market sentiment towards uranium, surged in response to supply disruption throughout 2025. The world’s two largest uranium mining companies, Kazatomprom and Cameco, cut production guidance for key projects due to a mix of weak prices and operational challenges.

“While we remain bullish on uranium over the medium to long term, we think prices may struggle to head higher than $100/lb this year, for two reasons,” said the research agency. 

First, spot uranium is currently trading more than 10 per cent above the term price, which tracks the price utilities pay for delivery of uranium over the next 3-10 years. “This suggests the recent rally in the spot market is mostly speculative, rather than driven by fundamentals,” said BMI.

Second, a decision on whether to approve NexGen’s Rook I Project in Canada’s Saskatchewan province is due to be delivered in the coming weeks by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, which is holding a hearing on the project currently. 

US deal boosts sentiments

“If the project is approved, it will be on track to deliver over 10,000 tonnes of uranium annually in the early 2030s. This would add to fears of a supply glut in uranium, weighing on both the spot price and the term price,” it said.

UBS and Canaccord are bullish on the price outlook for uranium as supply-side challenges continue against rising demand.

The AOCE said a $80 billion deal to build reactors in the US boosted sentiment. In late September 2025, prices rose to over $83 following the release of the World Nuclear Association (WNA) fuel report. 

The WNA estimates that global nuclear capacity will likely triple by 2050 to meet decarbonisation and electrification goals. But years of underinvestment have hollowed out the uranium project pipeline.

Cautious capital commitment

The US plans to quadruple domestic nuclear capacity, a narrative that has recentered uranium as a strategic fuel rather than a legacy commodity. China has almost tripled its nuclear capacity in the last decade and is aiming to add a further 150 nuclear reactors over the next 15 years.

France is implementing a Nuclear Acceleration Act. Numerous countries are reversing plans to phase out or retire nuclear energy plants, and countries such as South Korea are seeking to accelerate their nuclear plans.

Lobo Tiggre, CEO of IndependentSpeculator.com, said even at a spot price above $80 per pound, major producers such as Cameco and Kazatomprom have been cautious about committing capital to new large-scale developments.

BMI said currently, the uranium market is only modestly  under supplied. It estimates uranium production from Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium miner, to have increased by 8 per centin 2025, despite shortages of sulphuric acid.

Removing metal from circulation

“We forecast another 5 per cent increase in Kazakh supply for 2026. In Canada, the world’s second-largest producer, we expect production to rise by 12 per cent in 2026 as development delays ease at Cameco’s McArthur River/Key Lake mining and milling operation,” it said. 

In Namibia, the world’s third-largest producer, the research agency expects volumes to increase by 15 per cent year-on-year.

Canaccord Genuity said physical uranium investment vehicles, particularly the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, have removed tens of millions of pounds from circulation, tightening availability even further. That tightening is occurring alongside geopolitical fragmentation.

It said that since the early 2000s, a genuine step-change in demand is being witnessed in uranium that is catered towards nuclear. Public and private investment are now strongly supportive.

Further gains

BMI said in 2026, any further gains for uranium prices will likely come from strong retail demand and/or policy support. “In recent years, purchases of physical uranium by investment trusts, including the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust in Toronto and Yellow Cake Plc in London, have tightened both the spot and term markets, with both trusts stockpiling uranium that, in theory, will never be used for nuclear energy,” it said. 

Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, governments have also intervened in the uranium market, with Russia being the world’s largest producer of enriched uranium. 

BMI said the US Department of Energy could also designate uranium as a critical material, as it did with coking coal in May 2025, which would require amending the definition of a non-fuel material under the 2020 Energy Act. 

“Whichever way it happens, we would expect further recognition of uranium’s importance by the US government to boost sentiment in the spot market and increase contracting volumes in the term market,” said the research agency.

Published on February 11, 2026



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp