Banks turn to RBI for relief as rising yields strain their G-Sec portfolio

Banks turn to RBI for relief as rising yields strain their G-Sec portfolio


istock.com/scyther5
| Photo Credit:
scyther5

Banks have knocked on the Reserve Bank of India’s door, seeking relaxation to spread the provisioning they will need to make for the losses incurred by their bond portfolio due to substantial hardening of yields in the fourth quarter (Q4) of FY26.

Their ask is that the provisioning for mark-to-market losses on investments should be allowed to be spread over four quarters beginning Q4FY26. This will take the pressure off their bottomline.

Spike in G-Sec yields

In the fourth quarter (Q4FY26: January-March), Government securities’ (G-Secs) yields spiked, especially from February-end, with the onset of the West Asia war.

For example, yield of the 10-year benchmark G-Sec (6.48 per cent GS 2035) jumped 45 basis points (bps) to close at 7.04 per cent on March 30, 2026 (last day of trading in Q4FY26) against the December-end 2025 closing level of 6.59 per cent.

The last time banks had made a similar request to RBI was in 2018, and the regulator had allowed banks to spread their losses (due to sharp increase in G-Sec yields) by providing for depreciation on investments over four quarters, commencing from the quarter in which the loss was incurred.

Bond yields and prices are inversely co-related and move in opposite directions. So, with the yield of the aforementioned G-Sec rising 45 bps, its price crashed about ₹3 in the fourth quarter.

The war has triggered concerns in the bond market that rising global crude oil prices could have an inflationary effect in the economy. This, in turn, may require the RBI’s rate setting panel (the monetary policy committee) to up the repo rate in either its June or August monetary policy review to curb inflationary pressures.

Treasury portfolio hit

Bankers say it is not just banks that have taken a hit on their treasury portfolio, but the RBI too could face the heat of spike in G-Sec yields. They pointed out that the central bank purchased G-Secs aggregating about ₹7 lakh crore from banks under its open market operations (OMOs) to provide them durable liquidity in FY26.

“So, the central bank’s portfolio of G-Secs purchased under the OMO window too will be subject to the impact of spike in yields. This could have implications for declaration of dividend to the government for FY26,” said a banker.

The RBI transferred ₹2,68,590 crore as surplus to the Central government for FY25. The Union Budget for FY27 has budgeted a dividend/ surplus of ₹3.16 lakh crore from Reserve Bank of India, nationalised banks and financial institutions against ₹3,04,590 crore (revised) for FY25.

Venkatakrishnan Srinivasan, Founder & Managing Partner, Rockfort Fincap LLP, said that while rising yields typically result in mark-to-market pressures on bond portfolios, banks — being natural participants in the bond market— may have largely managed this risk through active portfolio rebalancing and prudent treasury management.

“As a result, treasury losses are likely to have been contained to an extent. At the same time, with strong double-digit credit growth, improved net interest margins, and significantly lower NPAs, the overall profitability of banks in the last fiscal year is expected to remain robust. This provides some cushion to the system, even as bond market volatility persists,” he said.

Published on April 5, 2026



Source link

Outstanding bank loans against shares hit 9-month high

Outstanding bank loans against shares hit 9-month high


Loans against shares are secured loans where borrowers pledge listed equities or bonds as collateral.
| Photo Credit:
phakphum patjangkata

Even as markets have remained volatile for much of FY26, the loans against shares and bonds have continued to rise. 

According to RBI data, outstanding gross bank credit against shares and bonds stood at ₹10,264 crore as of January 2026, up 5.1 per cent from the ₹9,766 crore at the same time last year. It was at ₹7,677 crore in January 2023 and ₹7,340 crore in January 2024.

Loans against shares are secured loans where borrowers pledge listed equities or bonds as collateral. Banks and NBFCs offer these at defined loan-to-value (LTV) ratios with interest rates linked to tenure and risk.

The figure, after steady increases through the last few months, is now at an nine-month high in January 2026.

However, banks hold a small fraction of the total credit against shares as NBFCs have a larger play in this segment. For instance, Bajaj Finance’s total loan against securities AUM as of December 2025 stood at ₹3,562 crores, up 26 per cent from the same period last year.

Vivek Iyer, Partner and Financial Services Risk Leader, Grant Thornton Bharat, said that during softer market conditions borrowers use existing portfolios to fuel immediate-term liquidity leading to increased lending against shares.

“When the markets are weak, investors are typically unwilling to liquidate their holdings at lower valuations. They tend to want to hold on to the securities for a longer time in the hope that the market will recover,” he said. In such a scenario, loans against shares provide an interim source of liquidity, allowing individuals to raise funds while continuing to stay invested in the market, he added.

Iyer mentioned that borrowers are likely to continue holding on to these loans even if stock prices remain under pressure. “Given the uncertain external economic scenario, borrowers will hold on to the loans in the hope that interest rates will be reduced, bringing down their overall credit burden,” he said. 

Generation gap

Beyond cyclical market conditions, there are also structural factors. Iyer noted that the younger demographic tends to have a lower base of physical collateral such as property but a higher exposure to equities and hence securities are becoming an alternative collateral option to borrow.

Certain policy tailwinds might also have spurred loan activity. In October of last year, the Central bank had removed the regulatory ceiling on such loans from ₹20 lakh to ₹1 crore. LTV for loans against shares was also proposed to increase to 60 per cent from the previous 50 per cent.

RBI data shows other personal loans have also seen growth in the last 12 months. Loans against fixed deposits went up 13 per cent year-on-year at ₹1,54,360 crore, while loans against gold jewellery went up 1.2x times to ₹4,00,517 crore. Overall personal loans went up by 15 per cent to ₹67, 23,042 crore.  

Published on April 5, 2026



Source link

बाजार में गिरावट का असर, टॉप कंपनियों के मार्केट कैप भरभराकर गिरे; हुआ 64,734 करोड़ का नुकसान

बाजार में गिरावट का असर, टॉप कंपनियों के मार्केट कैप भरभराकर गिरे; हुआ 64,734 करोड़ का नुकसान


Show Quick Read

Key points generated by AI, verified by newsroom

Sensex Top Companies Market Cap Loss: पिछले हफ्ते भले ही शेयर बाजार सिर्फ तीन दिन खुला, लेकिन इसका असर देश की बड़ी कंपनियों पर साफ देखने को मिला है. बीएसई सेंसेक्स में करीब 260 अंकों की गिरावट दर्ज की गई. वहीं सेंसेक्स की टॉप 10 सबसे वैल्यूएबल कंपनियों में से 6 के मार्केट कैप में कुल मिलाकर लगभग 64,734 करोड़ रुपये की कमी आई.

इस दौरान सबसे ज्यादा नुकसान भारती एयरटेल के शेयरों को हुआ. जिसकी वैल्यू करीब 30 हजार करोड़ रुपये घट गई. हालांकि, इस गिरावट के बीच 4 कंपनियों फायदे में भी रही. आइए जानते हैं, किन कंपनियों को कितना नुकसान हुआ है?

इन कंपनियों की मार्केट वैल्यू में आई गिरावट

बाजार में आई इस गिरावट के आंकड़ों की बात करें तो, भारती एयरटेल की वैल्यू करीब 29,993 करोड़ रुपये घटकर 10,20,420 करोड़ रुपये रह गई. वहीं आईसीआईसीआई बैंक का मार्केट कैप लगभग 12,845 करोड़ रुपये कम होकर 8,70,705 करोड़ रुपये पर आ गया. साथ ही बजाज फाइनेंस के शेयर भी फिसल गए. कंपनी शेयरों में 11,169 करोड़ रुपये की कमी दर्ज की गई.

इसके अलावा एचडीएफसी बैंक का मार्केट कैप करीब 7,822 करोड़ रुपये कम हो गया. जबकि हिंदुस्तान यूनिलीवर और स्टेट बैंक ऑफ इंडिया के स्टॉक में भी गिरावट देखी गई. इन आंकड़ों से साफ है कि बाजार के छोटे से हफ्ते में भी बड़ी कंपनियों को भारी नुकसान उठाना पड़ा है. 

इन कंपनियों के शेयर चमके

बाजार में उतार-चढ़ाव के बावजूद कुछ कंपनियों के मार्केट कैप में अच्छी बढ़त देखने को मिली. टाटा कंसल्टेंसी सर्विसेज की वैल्यू 22,359.78 करोड़ रुपये बढ़कर 8,87,028.43 करोड़ रुपये के आंकड़े पर पहुंच गई. वहीं इंफोसिस का मार्केट कैप 12,374.76 करोड़ रुपये बढ़कर 5,27,409.43 करोड़ रुपये पर पहुंच गया.

इसी दौरान लार्सन एंड टुब्रो में 6,575.43 करोड़ रुपये की बढ़त दर्ज की गई. जिससे कंपनी का मार्केट कैप 4,97,111.62 करोड़ रुपये हो गया. साथ ही रिलायंस इंडस्ट्रीज का मार्केट कैप 3,518.45 करोड़ रुपये बढ़कर 18,28,034.07 करोड़ रुपये तक पहुंच गया. जो इस अवधि में इन कंपनियों की मजबूती को दिखाता है.

डिस्क्लेमर: (यहां मुहैया जानकारी सिर्फ़ सूचना हेतु दी जा रही है. यहां बताना जरूरी है कि मार्केट में निवेश बाजार जोखिमों के अधीन है. निवेशक के तौर पर पैसा लगाने से पहले हमेशा एक्सपर्ट से सलाह लें. ABPLive.com की तरफ से किसी को भी पैसा लगाने की यहां कभी भी सलाह नहीं दी जाती है.)

यह भी पढ़ें: बाजार में हलचल के बीच ये शेयर रॉकेट की तरह भागा, दिया 265% का रिटर्न; निवेशकों की हो गई मौज 



Source link

SCR completes field trials for installation of Kavach 4.0

SCR completes field trials for installation of Kavach 4.0


The Zone has also commissioned Automatic Block Signalling, which helps in increasing section capacity, for distance of 479 Route Kms against the target of 357 Rkms during the last financial year.
| Photo Credit:
NAGARA GOPAL

The South-Central Railway (SCR) has successfully completed field trials for a distance of 487 Route kms for installation of Kavach 4.0, indigenously developed automatic train protection system, across by surpassing the Railway Board’s target of 402 Route kms

As part of the safety enhancement measures, steps were taken for installation of Kavach 4.0 across SCR network during the last financial year 2025-26.

Field trials

The field trials of Kavach 4.0 installation were conducted in the sections between Kazipet – Peddampet,  Malkajgiri – Kamareddi, Charlapalli – Raghunathpalli, Guntakal – Raichur, Mudkhed – Parbhani (81 Rkm). Loco Kavach trials were also successfully commissioned in the above sections. 

The Zone has also commissioned Automatic Block Signalling, which helps in increasing section capacity, for distance of 479 Route Kms against the target of 357 Rkms during the last financial year.

During the last financial year 2025-26, SCR has commissioned Automatic Block Signalling in different sections between Kazipet – Balharshah, Vijayawada – Duvvada & Wadi – Renigunta for a distance of 479 Rkms. Automatic Block Signalling is a system of train working in which movement of the trains is controlled by the automatic stop signals.

Published on April 5, 2026



Source link

Parliament body unhappy as PFBR cost mounts to ₹8,181 crore

Parliament body unhappy as PFBR cost mounts to ₹8,181 crore


File Photo: A section of the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) showing the complexity of the equipment that has gone into its making, in Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu
| Photo Credit:
RAGU R

A Parliamentary Committee has expressed unhappiness over the delays in—and mounting cost of—executing the 500 MW Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) nuclear power project, whose construction began in 2004.

The cost of the project is today estimated at ₹8,181 crore, compared with its original cost of ₹3,492 crore. For over a decade, the project has been “ready for commissioning next year.”

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Technology, Environment, Forests and Climate Change, which examined the ‘demands for grants’ of the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), has noted that the project “remains in the commissioning stage without having commenced power production, and that no operating revenue, profit or dividend has been generated by BHAVINI (the government company set up for the project).”

The PFBR project is of critical national importance, as it would set a template for India’s ambition to set up more fast breeder reactors. Fast breeder reactors use as fuel the plutonium-239 that comes out as waste in the conventional uranium-235 reactors, and generate more plutonium-239 – which is why they are called breeders. More importantly, they pave the way for using thorium as nuclear fuel—India has plenty of thorium. As fast breeder reactors generate energy, they can also convert thorium into uranium-233, which is nuclear fuel.

Thus, the PFBR is the first step in India getting into the second of the planned three-stage programme—the three phases can be broadly understood as relating to the use of uranium, plutonium and thorium as nuclear fuel.

Yet, the project, which was originally slated to be completed by 2011, has already been delayed by 15 years.

The committee has expressed “deep concern” over this delay and has called upon the government to “introduce a milestone-linked budgetary release mechanism for BHAVINI,” so as to align financial flows with actual technical progress. It has also asked BHAVINI to seek international help “to reduce the risk of recurring technical delays.”

The Budget for 2025-26 allocated ₹374 crore to BHAVINI which was later slashed to ₹150 crore when the revised estimates were drawn up. Still, BHAVINI could spend only ₹50 crore till December 2025.

The committee has observed that “BHAVINI’s severe underutilisation is particularly concerning given that approximately 70 per cent of the PFBR core has been loaded as of February 2026.”

Related project delayed 

Meanwhile, the ₹9,589 crore ‘fast reactor fuel cycle facility’ (FRFCF) project, which is closely related to the PFBR, has also been hugely delayed. The project, meant to reprocess the spent fuel coming out of the PFBR, was originally expected to be ready for operations in 2014. Last week, the Department of Atomic Energy told the Rajya Sabha that it is expected to be commissioned in December 2029.

While the FRFCF project has no relevance until the PFBR is commissioned, it is worth noting that the government has already spent ₹4,904 crore on it.

 

Published on April 5, 2026



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp