Former Raymond chairman Vijaypat Singhania died in Mumbai on Saturday evening, his family confirmed in a statement.
Former Raymond chairman Vijaypat Singhania passes away at 87 (Screengrab from X/PTI)
The 87-year-old’s son Gautam Singhania, the group’s current chairman and managing director, announced the death in a social media post on ‘X’.
Singhania passed away “peacefully” in Mumbai, and the last rites will be performed on Sunday, a Raymond Group spokesperson said.
Led Raymond for two decades
A recipient of the Padma Bhushan, Vijaypat Singhania led Raymond as chairman for two decades till 2000. After stepping down, he handed over the reins of the company to Gautam Singhania and transferred his entire 37 per cent stake in the firm to his son.
Apart from his business career, Singhania was also a keen aviator and held a world record for the highest altitude gained in a hot air balloon.
Vijaypat Singhania and Gautam Singhania were embroiled in legal disputes some years ago, though the issues were later settled.
Los Angeles Rams Wide Receiver Puka Nacua was in the center of a fresh controversy when a woman, who reports identified as Madison Atiabi, accused him of biting her. She had also filed a restraining order against the 24-year-old. However, now Nacua appears to have caught a small break in the case.
The victim has voluntarily withdrawn the application for the restraining order against Nacua. The NFL player is believed to have met the woman in December 2025, and the incident took place after a group hangout in Century City on December 31.
TMZ reported on Atiabi withdrew her application for the restraining order.
Why Madison Atiabi withdrew restraining order application?
Atiabi now appears to be changing course, as per TMZ. “The woman accusing Puka Nacua of using an antisemitic statement and then biting her so hard he left teeth marks has voluntarily withdrawn her application for a temporary restraining order,” the publication reported.
Joseph Kar, the lawyer representing Atiabi, explained the reason to drop the matter. As per Kar, his client dropped the TRO to ‘focus solely on the civil lawsuit’ which still happens to be moving ahead. Meanwhile, Nacua’s attorney, Levi McCathern, said the claims are ‘part of a shakedown attempt … with the woman demanding millions from his client.’
Nacua stands accused of allegedly biting two women and making an antisemitic statement at a New Year’s Eve gathering.
Videos of Atiabi dancing near Pacua emerged amidst the complaints. It appeared to show her be in a celebratory mood, while others around her were already partying. As per TMZ, sources indicated that the footage was taken hours after the alleged biting incident.
The complaint against Nacua alleges he said “F*** all the Jews” during dinner which allegedly left the complainant ‘immediately … uncomfortable and emotionally distressed.’
Atiabi also claimed that Nacua had bit her on the shoulder leaving teeth marks. Another woman also alleged the NFL player bit her on the thumb causing her to ‘scream in acute pain’.
A hearing is slated for April 14 and Atiabi is seeking monetary damages from Nacua. The footballer’s lawyer acknowledged the physical interaction, describing it as ‘horseplay’ and rejected the broader allegations as something misleading.
New Delhi, The Delhi High Court has stayed the eviction of the Delhi Race Club and the Indian Polo Association from their historic premises.
Delhi HC stays eviction of Race Club, Polo ground; directs centre to follow ‘due process’
Justice Mini Pushkarna, in two separate orders passed on March 25, restrained the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs from taking “forcible possession” of the Delhi Race Club at Kamal Ataturk Marg and the Jaipur Polo Ground in the Race Course area.
Both entities had been served with eviction notices dated March 12, 2026.
“Based on the aforesaid narration of facts and submissions made before this Court, a prima facie case has been made out in favour of the plaintiff. Further balance of convenience also lies in favour of the plaintiff and irreparable injury shall be caused to the plaintiff, if interim relief is not granted to the plaintiff,” the court said while restraining the Centre from dispossessing the club until the next hearing on April 9.
The court noted that the race club has been operating on the 53.242-acre premises since a lease was first granted in 1926.
“This court has made a pointed query to the defendant, whether the defendant would make a statement before this Court similar to the other connected matter, that the defendant shall not dispossess the plaintiff without resorting to due process of law,” Justice Pushkarna said.
Appearing for the club, Senior Advocate Suhail Dutt, argued that they were in lawful occupation and had been regularly paying ground rent.
He contended that under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, the club’s status is that of a “holding over” tenant, making the eviction notice illegal.
In a parallel petition filed by the Indian Polo Association regarding the Jaipur Polo Ground, the court held that even if the government seeks to resume land for a “larger public purpose,” it must follow the “due process of law.”
The IPA, represented by senior advocate Rajiv Nayar, submitted that the association had been in continuous possession of the ground for over four decades and had already made lease payments up to March 2030.
The Centre, however, argued that the lease had expired in 1993 and the IPA was merely a “licensee” with no right to remain.
Refuting the Centre’s attempt at summary eviction, the court cited Supreme Court precedents to emphasise that the government cannot use force to evict a person in settled possession.
“This court binds the government not to evict the petitioner on the basis of the Eviction Notice dated 12th March, 2026. In case the government seeks to resume the land in question, the government shall initiate appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law, and follow due process of law,” the court said.
The court has sought responses from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs in both matters. It has listed both the matters for April 9 for further hearing.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Delhi Traffic Police issued a comprehensive traffic advisory on Thursday on the temporary closure of the Khanda Chowk Bridge in the Chander Vihar, Nangloi area.
The Khanda Chowk Bridge, situated over a drain, will remain closed for a projected period of seven days starting March 26. (Representative/HT File Photo )
The closure, which takes effect from March 26, 2026, is necessitated by essential repair and resurfacing works being executed by the Irrigation and Flood Control (I & FC) Department, it said.
Road closure details, duration
The Khanda Chowk Bridge, situated over a drain, will remain closed for a projected period of seven days, which means until next Thursday, April 2.
This is intended to facilitate necessary structural improvements to the bridge surface and ensure long-term safety for commuters.
To manage the resulting impact on local traffic, the Delhi Traffic Police implemented specific arrangements to maintain smooth vehicle flow and minimise congestion in the Nangloi area.
Traffic diversions and alternate routes
Commuters are strongly advised to plan their journeys in advance and utilise the following alternate routes designated by the authorities, the advisory said.
From Nilothi towards Vikas Puri: Motorists coming from Nilothi are advised to take an alternate route via Mahadev Chowk. From there, they should proceed towards Macchi Market/DAV Public School, Vikas Puri to reach their final destinations.
Macchi Market, Vikas Puri towards Nilothi/Chander Vihar: Traffic moving in the opposite direction is similarly advised to divert via Mahadev Chowk. Commuters should follow the route leading towards Chander Vihar or Nilothi to bypass the closed bridge.
The police have also requested all motorists to remain patient, adhere strictly to traffic rules, and cooperate with personnel deployed at various intersections to ensure effective traffic management.
For real-time updates and further assistance, citizens can connect with the Delhi Traffic Police through several official channels, including WhatsApp at 87508-71493. The helpline numbers are 1095 or 011-25844444.
For the first time, candidates from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) will be eligible for reservation benefits in the Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test (UP-TET) scheduled for 2026. Officials confirmed that the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission (UPSESC) issued guidelines on March 20 detailing the new provisions.
The Prayagraj-headquartered Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission. (File)
Under the new guidelines, unreserved candidates must secure a minimum of 60% marks (90 out of 150) to qualify for the eligibility certificate. Candidates from reserved categories—including Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), Other Backward Classes (OBC), EWS, dependents of freedom fighters, ex-servicemen, and persons with disabilities—will require 55% marks (82 out of 150) to qualify.
The detailed marks of UP-TET candidates will be released on the Commission’s official website: https://www.upessc.up.gov.in.
In the previous UP-TET, held in 2021, EWS candidates were not entitled to reservation, despite the central and state governments having introduced the EWS quota in January and February 2019, respectively.
Confirming the development, UPSESC PRO Sanjay Kumar Singh said, “EWS candidates have been granted a 5% relaxation in qualifying marks, similar to other reserved categories, with approval from the state government for this edition of UP-TET.”
The National Council for Teacher Education’s (NCTE) 2011 TET guidelines permit school managements (government, local bodies, aided, and private) to provide relaxations for reserved category candidates, such as SC/ST, OBC and persons with disabilities, in line with their existing reservation policies.
Experts view the UPSESC’s move as a significant relief for EWS aspirants, as it aligns UP-TET eligibility criteria with existing reservation policies. This relaxation in qualifying marks is considered a positive step toward constitutional justice and social inclusion.
After a four-year gap, the teacher eligibility examination is scheduled to be conducted in the state from July 2 to 4, 2026. The application process will begin on March 27.
UP-TET 2026, which is a qualifying examination for the appointment of assistant teachers in Class 1 to 8 government-run schools, is expected to attract over 20 lakh applicants. In the previous UP-TET, held on January 21, 2022, a total of 21,65,181 registrations were recorded (12,91,628 for the Primary level and 8,73,553 for the Upper Primary level).
A gaming livestreamer is under scrutiny after a viral clip appeared to show him allegedly assaulting his girlfriend during a broadcast, sparking backlash across social media.
Sisco later addressed the incident in another broadcast, denying that he hit his partner. (Screenshot from a livestream clip/ X)
Jake Lucky, an esports content creator, shared the video on X. Posting the clip, he wrote: “Warzone streamer Jordan Sisco has been accused of hitting his girlfriend after he idiotically spilled a drink on his new gaming PC… Absolutely disgusting.”
In a follow-up comment, he added: “This happened shortly after the streamer believed he had ended stream, but was all caught live,” and remarked, “You can’t make this stuff up.”
The clip, around 29 seconds long, spread across social media platforms such, drawing reactions from viewers.
Who is Jordan Sisco?
Jordan Sisco is a US-based internet personality known for livestreaming gaming content across platforms including Twitch, YouTube and TikTok.
He primarily streams Call of Duty: Warzone and has built a modest following, with tens of thousands of followers and a regular live audience.
What the video shows
The footage originates from a TikTok livestream. In the clip, Sisco’s girlfriend can be heard telling him: “Okay, take it off. Take the lids off. Chill. You need to have no drinks in here.”
Moments later, Sisco appears to move off-camera and swing his arm, after which distressed sounds are heard. Before the stream ends, he is heard saying: “It was in here! It was on this! I don’t even know how! I turned around… I don’t know what to do.”
Streamer responds to allegations
Sisco later addressed the incident in another broadcast, denying that he hit his partner. “I wasn’t hitting her… I pushed her,” he said, adding, “I didn’t… hit her. I would never hit her on the face.”
No official complaint or law enforcement action has been publicly confirmed at this stage.
The clip has triggered strong reactions online. Some called for the streamer to be banned, while others questioned whether authorities should intervene.
