How will you celebrate Well-Being Week in Law?


Lawyer Wellness

How will you celebrate Well-Being Week in Law?

The first week of May is an opportunity for a highly stressed profession to take a step back and consider some self-care by celebrating the Well-Being Week in Law.

Created by the Institute for Well-Being in Law, the Well-Being Week in Law was first launched in May 2020 under the name “Lawyer Well-Being Week.” This year, it is being marked from May 5 to May 9, and the ABA is participating to support the campaign and raise awareness about the mental health needs of the profession.

The theme that the IWBL has chosen for 2025 is “The Social Rx: Boosting Well-Being with Connection.” Daily themes throughout the week encourage participants to consider physical, spiritual, intellectual, social and emotional well-being.

The ABA also has its own content to promote wellness. A live 60-minute CLE webinar, “Still Excited to Practice? Moving Beyond Cynicism in Law Firm,” will be offered May 9 at 1 p.m. ET by the Law Practice Division. The event is free for members. Registration is available here.

A number of on-demand CLE programs are also available through the ABA Learning Center. Those and other articles and resources can be found on the Commission on Lawyer Assistance Programs’ Well-Being in Law page.





Source link

Judge rejects home confinement for ‘slots whisperer’ lawyer who spent nearly $9M in investor money


Criminal Justice

Judge rejects home confinement for ‘slots whisperer’ lawyer who spent nearly $9M in investor money

California lawyer Sara Jacqueline King, who was accused of spending nearly $9 million in investor money, will be serving prison time after pleading guilty to wire fraud and money laundering. (Photo from Shutterstock)

A California lawyer accused of spending nearly $9 million in investor money will be serving prison time after pleading guilty to wire fraud and money laundering.

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter of the Central District of California sentenced Sara Jacqueline King of Newport Beach, California, to 21 months in prison Monday, report Law360, the Orange County Register, the Daily Mail and Casino.org. She is also required to pay $8.7 million in restitution.

King admitted that she spent the money on Las Vegas gambling and a lavish lifestyle. A previous civil lawsuit filed against King by a lending company cited its belief that King “moved into the Wynn Las Vegas resort and hotel, lived there for six months, and gambled 24/7.”

King called herself the “slots whisperer” and claimed that she had an unbeatable strategy for high-stakes slots, according to Casino.org. In reality, the only strategy in slots “is remembering to press a button,” the article says.

On a podcast, the Daily Mail reported, King asserted that she could “sell anything—even fire to the devil.”

“I was looking for a way out of law,” she reportedly said on the podcast. “Law was so miserable. I hate being a lawyer, it makes no money whatsoever.”

King had told investors that their money would be used to make loans to wealthy people secured by assets, such as luxury cars, yachts and major league sports contracts. In reality, she did not make loans with the money, her plea agreement said.

King’s attorney, public defender Samuel Cross, had sought a sentence of home confinement. He said her behavior was fueled by anxiety, ambition and drug addiction, according to Law360.

“She has to rebuild from nothing at the age of 41, and to do that is going to be incredibly difficult for her,” Cross said.





Source link

Lawyer charged with stealing beer, trying to bite officer


Criminal Justice

Lawyer charged with stealing beer, trying to bite officer

A lawyer in Albany, New York, was accused Friday of violating an order of protection, hitting a woman, stealing beer, and trying to bite a police officer. (Image from Shutterstock)

Updated: A lawyer in Albany, New York, was accused Friday of violating an order of protection, hitting a woman, stealing beer, and trying to bite a police officer.

Lawyer Luke Malamood, 40, of New York was charged in a 21-count indictment, report WNYT, News10 ABC and the Albany Times Union via MSN. He pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Malamood has handled a number of high-profile cases, according to the Albany Times Union.

The indictment alleges that Malamood stole beer from a market in December 2024 and tried to bite a police officer during his arrest. He is also accused of violating a family court order of protection last summer, striking a female acquaintance in April, and trying to steal the woman’s property.

Malamood is represented by Joseph Gerstenzang. When asked for a comment by the ABA Journal, he wrote in an email, “As with my professional practice, I do not typically comment on ongoing legal matters. However, I will say, I have had significant struggles with alcohol over the past few years which have led me to some unfortunate decisions far outside of my character. Some of these have included attempts to communicate with my young children over the course of a contentious custody dispute. While I continue to work diligently on my sobriety, and towards a fair and proper resolution to this criminal matter, I kindly ask the media to respect my privacy and the privacy of my family.”

Updated on May 9 at 1:24 p.m. to add Luke Malamood’s comment.





Source link

Likeness of man killed in road-rage incident gives impact statement at sentencing, thanks to AI


Artificial Intelligence & Robotics

Likeness of man killed in road-rage incident gives impact statement at sentencing, thanks to AI

An AI-generated video of a slain man told an Arizona judge last month that he believes in forgiveness, and that in another life, he and the man who killed him “probably could have been friends.”

Judge Todd Lang commented on those moving comments when sentencing Gabriel Paul Horcasitas for manslaughter in the road-rage death of Christopher Pelkey, report KNXV, AZFamily and Fox 10 Phoenix.

The sentence was a year more than sought by prosecutors, according to KNXV.

“I love that AI,” said Lang, a judge in Maricopa County, Arizona. “Thank you for that. I felt like that was genuine; that his obvious forgiveness of Mr. Horcasitas reflects the character I heard about today.”

The video, created by Pelkey’s family, was the first use of AI to create a slain victim’s impact statement in Arizona and possibly the nation, according to KNXV.

Police had alleged that the shooting happened in November 2021 after an altercation between Pelkey and Horcasitas that began while they were driving. At a stoplight, Pelkey got out of his vehicle and approached Horcasitas, who then fired a gun multiple times, KPNX reports.

Pelkey’s sister, Stacey Wales, created the AI video with her husband and a friend. In an interview with Fox 10 Phoenix, she said she had opinions about whether she forgave the shooter.

“But it was important not to make Chris say what I was feeling and to detach and let him speak because he said things that would never come out of my mouth, but I know would come out his,” she said.

Wales said creating the video was not a simple process.

“There’s no tool out there that you can just go and say: Here’s a voice file. Here’s a picture. Please make it come to life,” she told Fox 10 Phoenix. “So they’re scrounging and using this tool and that tool and this tool and this script and this audio and this image and trying to mash it all together and make a Frankenstein of love.”

The group included real video clips and a photo that Pelkey took of himself with a filter to show himself in old age.

“This is the best I can ever give you of what I would have looked like if I got the chance to grow old,” said the AI-generated Pelkey in the video. “Remember, getting old is a gift that not everybody has, so embrace it, and stop worrying about those wrinkles.”

AZFamily spoke with Gary Marchant, a professor at the Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law and a member of an Arizona Supreme Court committee that is evaluating the use of AI in courts.

“If you look at the facts of this case, I would say that the value of [AI] overweighed the prejudicial effect. But if you look at other cases, you could imagine where they would be very prejudicial,” Marchant said.





Source link

Rocky Patel’s Road: From small-firm lawyer to selling 30 million cigars per year


In 2022, Cigar Aficionado rated the Rocky Patel “Sixty” the No. 1 cigar in the free world. That’s a remarkable feat. The industry’s preeminent publication considers about 700 cigars for its annual survey, and its reviewers do not know the identity or any other details of the stogies they are smoking.

Rakesh (“Rocky”) Patel, the brand’s president and CEO, credits many things for his success as a cigar maker, including lessons learned from his days practicing law in Los Angeles.

“From the time you plant a seedling in the ground to the time you get a cigar in the box takes four to five years,” Patel tells me in a recent phone interview. “Three hundred different hands touch the tobacco. If you cheat the process along the way, or take any shortcuts, you don’t get the results.”

Patel, 64, says this mirrors the requirements to becoming a successful lawyer. It is about “attention to detail. When you are reading a document or drafting a pleading, you have to be very precise. You have to be perfect.”

From lawyer to cigar maker

Patel’s background makes him an unlikely cigar industry magnate. He was born in New Delhi, India’s capital city in the north, and he grew up on the country’s west coast in Bombay, now Mumbai. In 1974, his family came to the United States, and Patel went to high school in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and then to the University of Wisconsin.

Looking to escape the cold and snow, Patel headed to Los Angeles for law school. But “not wanting to be a starving student,” he says, the would-be lawyer chose Southwestern Law School. This way he could work as a law clerk during the day and attend the evening program.

Law school wasn’t some deep-seated dream for Patel nor inspired by a goal to change the world. His motivation was simpler: “I wasn’t ready to go face the real world.”

He gives credit to the rigor of the evening program for his drive today. “I worked every day in a law firm, and then at five at night, got in my car, tried to eat a sandwich; 6 o’clock started law school, was done at 10 o’clock; and then in the library till 1 o’clock. That work ethic was instilled in me.”

Patel landed at a small firm in Beverly Hills that did entertainment and plaintiff’s product liability work. The office was located close to the Grand Havana Club. It was there that Patel smoked his first cigar and became a founding member of the club.

While there he would be approached to invest in a startup called Indian Tabac Cigar Company. The hook was that the business had a license to trade off the famed Indian Motorcycle Company name. But the business faced all manner of problems—including discovering that there was no such licensing agreement after all.

The business was a black hole for money. “I kept writing checks and kept writing checks and not getting anything back,” says Patel who knew something needed to change. “So, I ended up taking over the company after several years.”

The naysayers were abundant. Cigar businesses are “‘handed down from generation to generation,’” Patel was told. “‘You have to be of Cuban descent. You just can’t get into the cigar business. You’ll never make it.’”

As part of the turnaround, Patel would bring the many steps of cigar making in-house. He recounts an assortment of quality-control problems caused by relying on others in production.

In 2003, with all of the facets of manufacturing now under Patel’s control, it was time to put his name on the cigars. Indian Tabac was now Rocky Patel Premium Cigars.

This year, the company is celebrating three decades in business. In August, its “30th Anniversary” cigar will be released to commemorate the occasion. Patel revealed in a 2022 interview with Cigar Aficionado that he sells nearly 30 million cigars a year in close to 100 countries.

In addition to the “Sixty” getting such high marks from Cigar Aficionado, many of Patel’s other offerings have rated very well in the magazine’s annual “Top 25” list. In 2024, Patel’s “Conviction” came in at No. 7. It carries a $100 price tag.

The publication’s reviewer noted that a high-priced cigar is not always a guarantee of quality. But he says that Patel has pulled it off, writing: “We found the Conviction brilliant, a medium-to-full-bodied cigar that’s a superb performer, delivering an opulent core of cocoa powder and dark chocolate flavor. And it’s a cigar that builds in flavor, getting better and better the longer it is smoked.”

Law degree not going up in smoke

Rocky Patel’s “Sixty” was rated the No. 1 cigar in the free world in 2022 by Cigar Aficionado. (Photo courtesy of Rocky Patel Premium Cigars)

Patel’s cigars are produced in Nicaragua and Honduras where he has tobacco farms and massive factories. Not surprisingly, with an international operation this large, plus headquarters in Naples, Florida, and palatial cigar lounges—Burn by Rocky Patel—in five U.S. cities, I tell Patel I’m sure he’s still getting mileage out of his law degree.

It’s funny I should mention that, Patel says. “About a half hour before this interview, I was reviewing contracts. I’m consistently dealing with lawyers. I’m consistently reviewing contracts,” he shares. “The legal education helps in many, many different parts of what we do. Whether it’s an acquisition. Whether it’s a deal.”

Patel has also had a hands-on role in multiple cases brought over several years by cigar manufacturer and retail groups in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging various attempts by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to regulate cigars.

Patel tells me that regulations sought to be imposed, which he called “de facto prohibition,” would have cost his company $80 million to comply and wipe out 80% of the premium cigar industry. The challengers have enjoyed tremendous success in their fight, he says.

This includes, earlier this year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirming a lower court decision, striking down as arbitrary and capricious, FDA regulations addressing sales, promotions and distribution of “premium cigars.” The federal appeals court agreed with the district court that the FDA had not considered evidence that “premium cigars” have fewer adverse health effects than other tobacco products.

Left open in the appeals court’s decision and sent back to the district court to determine is the definition of a “premium cigar.” In general, considerations include the nature of the tobacco, manufacturing process and weight.

Patel shares a story about his early days in business and first trip to Honduras.

“It was the Wild West,” Patel explains. The Contras and Sandinistas had been at war. He recalls that everyone had a weapon on them, and there were landmines to worry about.

One of Patel’s local partners fired several rounds from a gun through his car’s sunroof. “Tat, tat, tat, tat,” he says, imitating the sound.

“This is nuts,” Patel remembers thinking. “He thought it was cool. I didn’t think it was so cool.”

For Rocky Patel, it was a “Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Beverly Hills anymore” moment.


Randy Maniloff

Randy Maniloff is an attorney at White and Williams in Philadelphia and an adjunct professor at the Temple University Beasley School of Law. He runs the website CoverageOpinions.info.


This column reflects the opinions of the author and not necessarily the views of the ABA Journal—or the American Bar Association.





Source link

BigLaw firms tell Democratic lawmakers they maintained independence in pro bono deals with Trump


Law Firms

BigLaw firms tell Democratic lawmakers they maintained independence in pro bono deals with Trump

Two Democratic lawmakers aren’t satisfied with answers from five BigLaw firms asked to provide information on pro bono deals that they reached with President Donald Trump to avoid punitive executive orders.. (Image from Shutterstock)

Two Democratic lawmakers aren’t satisfied with answers from five BigLaw firms asked to provide information on pro bono deals that they reached with President Donald Trump to avoid punitive executive orders.

“The inability of the firms to provide serious answers calls for aggressive oversight and inspection of the president’s $1 billion shakedown for free legal services for pet causes,” said the lawmakers, U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and U.S. Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, in a statement provided to Reuters.

Publications covering the letters, in addition to Reuters, include Law.com and Law360.

The law firms are A&O Shearman; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft; Kirkland & Ellis; Latham & Watkins; and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. All said they did not compromise their principles when they agreed to provide millions of dollars in pro bono assistance to matters supported by Trump and the firms.

Kirkland & Ellis said in its letter it would “continue to provide pro bono and other legal services on a nonpartisan basis to a wide range of underserved populations,” according to Reuters. The other firms said they retained independence to pick their clients and cases.

Four of the firms also indicated that the deals resolved an inquiry into their diversity efforts by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A fifth firm, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, wasn’t subject to the EEOC probe.

The five firms are the latest to respond to information requests from Blumenthal and Raskin. Firms that received earlier requests for information about deals are Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; Milbank; and Willkie Farr & Gallagher.

Blumenthal and Raskin “were similarly not enthused” with responses from the first group of firms that were asked for information, according to Law360.

The firms reached the deals to avoid executive orders that, among other things, call for the suspension of lawyers’ security clearances and imperil their clients’ government contracts.

See also:

Recruitment of lawyers from Trump-targeted firms is ethics violation, Democrats’ letter says





Source link