Florida cases seeking death penalty for child sex abuse could test precedent in Supreme Court

Florida cases seeking death penalty for child sex abuse could test precedent in Supreme Court


Death Penalty

Florida cases seeking death penalty for child sex abuse could test precedent in Supreme Court

Two Florida prosecutions could test the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in 2008 that held that the death penalty for child rape is unconstitutional. (Image from Shutterstock)

Two Florida prosecutions could test the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in 2008 that held that the death penalty for child rape is unconstitutional.

Prosecutors in Palm Beach County, Florida, filed notice earlier this month that they intend to seek the death penalty for Josue Mendez-Sales, and his roommate, Pablo Cobon-Mendez, who are accused of repeatedly sexually abusing a 6-year-old girl, the South Florida Sun Sentinel reports in a story published by the Tampa Bay Times.

And in Putnam County, Florida, prosecutors indicated in June that they will seek the death penalty against Dimeco Henderson, who is accused of sexually abusing two children over a three-year period.

Florida adopted the death penalty for child rape in 2023, the first to do so following the 2008 Supreme Court decision. Tennessee followed in 2024, and in 2025, Idaho, Oklahoma and Arkansas passed similar laws, the South Florida Sun Sentinel article reports. But Florida appears to be the only state that is seeking the death penalty in trials for child sex-abuse cases, according to Robin Maher, the executive director for the Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C.

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in June 2008 that the death penalty for child rape is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment and the 14th Amendment. Now-retired Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in the case, Kennedy v. Louisiana.

The four justices who joined Kennedy’s opinion are retired or no longer alive. Three of the four dissenters are still on the high court: Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas.

Florida State Sen. Jonathan Martin, a Republican in Fort Myers, Florida, sponsored the Florida bill authorizing the death penalty for child rape. He told the South Florida Sun Sentinel that the law is designed to challenge Supreme Court precedent because it is different than the one at issue in Kennedy v. Louisiana. The Florida law includes a penalty phase to consider aggravating and mitigating factors, unlike the Louisiana law.

Opponents of the new laws see a slippery slope. One critic is Michelle Suskauer, a West Palm Beach, Florida, defense attorney and a former president of the Florida Bar.

“Where will the line be drawn and what other charges will be included?” Suskauer asked in an interview with the South Florida Sun Sentinel.

She wondered whether lawmakers will follow with the death penalty for child pornography, for rape or for kidnapping.

“So where does the line get drawn? You keep moving the line, that’s a scary situation,” she said.





Source link

Kutak Rock hits 600-attorney mark with Ohio expansion

Kutak Rock hits 600-attorney mark with Ohio expansion


Law Firms

Kutak Rock hits 600-attorney mark with Ohio expansion

Kutak Rock is opening Ohio offices in Columbus, Ohio, and Cleveland and acquiring four public finance attorneys to help staff them. (Image from Shutterstock)

Kutak Rock is opening Ohio offices in Columbus, Ohio, and Cleveland and acquiring four public finance attorneys to help staff them.

With the new additions, Kutak Rock now has 600 attorneys and 21 offices in its 60th anniversary year, according to an Oct. 28 press release.

The lawyers and several new staff members joining the law firm previously worked at Squire Patton Boggs, Law360 reports.

The new lawyers bring “extensive experience advising governmental entities across the state and outstanding reputations in public finance,” said Buck Heim, the managing partner of Kutak Rock’s Omaha, Nebraska, regional offices, in the press release.





Source link

Law firm deals with government have ethical implications, DC Bar ethics opinion says

Law firm deals with government have ethical implications, DC Bar ethics opinion says


Ethics

Law firm deals with government have ethical implications, DC Bar ethics opinion says

Law firms that enter into agreements with the government that may limit or shape their law practices should consider the ethical implications, according to an October ethics opinion by the District of Columbia Bar. (Image from Shutterstock)

Law firms that enter into agreements with the government that may limit or shape their law practices should consider the ethical implications, according to an October ethics opinion by the District of Columbia Bar.

The D.C. Bar’s Ethics Opinion 391 doesn’t directly reference deals made by nine firms with President Donald Trump to avoid punitive executive orders. The agreements require them to provide $940 million altogether in pro bono help to causes supported by Trump.

But those kind of deals are among those covered by the opinion, Bloomberg Law reports.

The issues include:

  • Potential conflicts of interest for representation that is adverse to the government. “A lawyer must represent her clients ‘zealously and diligently,’” the opinion said. “This includes the right of each client to conflict-free representation because a conflicted lawyer may be tempted, consciously or otherwise, to pull her punches in advocating for or otherwise representing her client.”

  • To continue the representation, the lawyer must disclose the conflict and obtain informed consent from the client. But a firm may not be able to give full disclosure of the conflict if it doesn’t know which of its actions might trigger adverse government action. “Obtaining a valid waiver may be difficult,” the opinion said.

  • Restrictions on a lawyer’s right to practice. Lawyers are prohibited from making agreements in which a restriction on the lawyer’s right to practice is part of the settlement of a controversy.

  • Professional independence. Lawyers improperly limit the exercise of their professional judgment if they take third-party direction on whether to accept or decline a certain client or direction on the services to be provided.

Lawyers who agree to such deals aren’t the only ones who should consider the ethical issues, the opinion said. Ethics rules regarding restricting the right to practice and professional independence also apply to lawyers negotiating such deals on behalf of the government, the opinion said.





Source link

Responding to merger talks claim, Cadwalader says ‘we regularly evaluate our strategy,’ but finances are strong

Responding to merger talks claim, Cadwalader says ‘we regularly evaluate our strategy,’ but finances are strong


Law Firms

Responding to merger talks claim, Cadwalader says ‘we regularly evaluate our strategy,’ but finances are strong

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft told Law.com that it has hired 75 attorneys in 2025 and expects to have one of its best financial years in history with expected revenue of more than $600 million. (Photo from Shutterstock)

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft told Law.com that it has hired 75 attorneys in 2025 and expects to have one of its best financial years in history with expected revenue of more than $600 million.

Law.com contacted Cadwalader after legal industry sources said it is in merger talks with several top-grossing law firms. But a firm spokesperson told the publication that merger suitors aren’t unusual.

“As every top firm does, we regularly evaluate our strategy to further capitalize on our market-leading strengths for our clients. We have been approached by many top-tier firms for years, and that continues,” the spokesperson said. “The firm is in a very strong financial position and remains confident in our stand-alone strategy.”

Cadwalader lost 37 lawyers to Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in October. The firm also lost partner groups in 2025 to Proskauer Rose and Sidley Austin.

But the firm “has kept hold of its core profitable practices, including its structured finance and other corporate practices,” the article reports.





Source link

Furloughed lawyer’s passion is topped with sauerkraut and mustard

Furloughed lawyer’s passion is topped with sauerkraut and mustard


Personal Lives

Furloughed lawyer’s passion is topped with sauerkraut and mustard

A furloughed IRS lawyer used his ability to parse government regulations to open a hot dog cart that he is operating full time during the government shutdown.

The name of Isaac Stein’s Washington, D.C., hot dog stand is Shysters and the slogan is “The Only Honest Ripoff in D.C.”

Publications with coverage include Reuters, Business Insider, the New York Post and WUSA 9.

The 31-year-old lawyer wears a shirt and tie as “part of the shtick” while serving customers, he told Reuters.

“Part of what I’m doing with my expression here is there are many layers of irony,” Stein told Business Insider. “One of the layers is that I’m a lawyer, and I’m doing everything correctly. I have all the right permits, and I pay taxes.”

Stein spent a five-figure sum to buy the cart and equipment. He had to “navigate a complex regulatory process,” he told Reuters. There were several inspections, and he had to obtain a motor vehicle registration and sidewalk permit.

Stein sells hot dogs, Moon Pies and RC Cola. A hot dog with mustard and sauerkraut, labeled “The Only Choice” on his menu, costs $10. A hot dog with any other topping costs $11.

“From a young age, I have wanted to punish people for putting ketchup on a hot dog,” he told Business Insider. “The pricing difference is reflective of incentives: I want people to do it the right way.”

Stein nets $200 to $300 a day, but the real reward is interacting with customers. “People seem to be responding really well, and I’m just overjoyed,” Stein told WUSA 9. “It brings me so much joy to make people laugh and smile.”

When he was working, he sold hot dogs only on weekends. He plans to go back to that schedule when the furlough ends. He’s looking forward to the return.

“Everyone wants to get back to work, because we actually like what we do,” he told Business Insider.





Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp