A low-carbon leap in ammonia production

A low-carbon leap in ammonia production


Nitrogen exists in nature as molecules of two atoms; the (triple) bond between them is extremely hard to break. To make ammonia, the bedrock of fertilizers and many other chemicals, you need a single atom of nitrogen to combine with three of hydrogen to form the NH3 molecule. The Haber-Bosch process, invented in 1909, still remains the singular method of producing industrial scale ammonia. While ammonia has been the panacea for the world’s food requirements, the Haber-Bosch method of making it has a deleterious flipside — it requires a heck of a lot of heat, mostly obtained from burning stuff that emits carbon dioxide, mankind’s biggest enemy today. The bonding energy of the N2 molecule is 945 KJ/mol — in other words, it takes burning 1.4 kg of coal to split one kg of molecular nitrogen into single atom nitrogen.

For decades, scientists have been scratching their heads over an alternative for Haber-Bosch, yet in vain.

And now, scientists at the Lawrence-Berkeley lab in California, USA, have announced that they have figured out a room-temperature alternative to separate the two atoms of a nitrogen molecule. This, if taken to the industry, can be the holy grail that mankind has been searching for.

What the L-B lab scientists did is truly the stuff of Harry Potter. Short of the swish of a magic wand, it has everything — powders, potions, gas and all. The group of five scientists, led by Polly Arnold, Director, Chemical Sciences Division, used rare earth metals, potassium and chemicals called phenolates to break the bond between two nitrogen atoms that form the nitrogen molecule.

How it works is something like this. It has been known for some decades that rare earth metals (of the lanthanide series in the periodic table, or even zirconium and titanium) can combine with molecular nitrogen — this has something to do with a peculiar way the electrons fill in their orbitals. Arnold and her team put this knowledge to work. They took phenolates and used them as a sort of a glue to link two rare earth metals at the molecular level to form a sort of a rectangle, or a ‘complex’. Then they diffused molecular nitrogen (N2) into the cavity of the rectangle. When they did this, each of the two atoms of the nitrogen molecules got linked to different molecules of the rare metals on either side, thereby “activating” the nitrogen (weakening the N-N bond). Then they introduced the villain that broke the love between the two nitrogen atoms — potassium. Post their divorce, the nitrogen atoms were free to join hands with someone else. When hydrogen becomes the new suitor, you get ammonia or amines.

At the heart of the whole process (which, by the way, happens at room temperature) is the trick employed to make the rectangular complexes with rare earth metals, into the cavity of which nitrogen molecules could be trapped and their bonds cleaved. “This new family of complexes upturned 90 years of accepted wisdom by proving that rare earths can bind and reduce dinitrogen,” says a paper by Arnold et al, published in Chem Catalysis.

In the process, potassium was used as a source of electrons. In a write-up published on L-B lab’s website, Arnold has said that her next step would be to use electrodes instead of potassium as a source of electrons, as these electrodes can supply electrons from, say, solar cells.

So, does all this mean that the world is ready to dump the century-old Haber-Bosch process and seize Polly Arnold’s method? Not at all. One chemistry professor at IIT-Madras, told quantum, that he suspects the yield rate would be poor in the L-B method. Even the L-B website does not believe that this could be so instantly transformative. However, the L-B route does open up an interesting pathway that could one day lead mankind to low-cost, low-carbon ammonia. The L-B scientists indeed have said that they are willing to licence the technology.





Source link

How yoga reduces substance abuse problems by raising GABA

How yoga reduces substance abuse problems by raising GABA


Opioids are natural, semi-synthetic or synthetic chemicals that interact with receptors in our body and reduce the perception of pain. (Opioids are natural or lab-derived, while opiates are derived from poppy plants.)

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a severe substance use disorder. Dependence may be on prescription opioids (drugs such as codeine, tramadol, tapentadol, morphine) often given to ameliorate pain or street opioids (such as heroin, brown sugar). When the body becomes used to opioids, it can lead to severe withdrawal symptoms such as watering through eyes and nose, severe body aches, flu-like symptoms, sleeplessness, anxiety and irritability. Chronic use can cause impairment in cognition, sexual dysfunction, severe impairment of social and occupational functions and adds to the financial burden.

In order to find an alternative to opioids for pain control, a study to develop a yoga module to reduce opioid use was carried out by Dr Hemant Bhargav from Integrated Centre for Yoga, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru.

Alternative pain control

It was found that yoga increases gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in the brain, as well as oxytocin which contributes in the management of opioid withdrawal symptoms and the attenuation of relapse. It has also been found to be useful in enhancing prefrontal activation, reducing impulsivity and promoting positive behavioural changes with better self-regulation.

“In the initial clinical case study with 9-month follow-up, the module was found suitable for bringing relief to patients suffering from opioid dependence,” says a press release from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Subsequently, a randomised controlled trail was performed with 60 subjects divided into two groups. One group performed yoga in addition to standard therapy while another group took up exercise in addition to standard therapy. After the 12 weeks of intervention, it was observed that subjects in the yoga group were 2.68 times more likely to show negative urine screening for opioids than the exercise group.

The study suggested that yoga can be a useful add-on tool to enhance abstinence and reduce substance use severity in the people with opioid dependence. Besides, the yoga group had significantly better reduction in pain, craving, anxiety and depression and better improvement in quality of life and quality of sleep as compared to the exercise group.

Also, the results showed that OUD patients, when viewing opioid-related cues, manifested significantly activated bilateral brain regions. These regions are involved in Salience Attribution (Anterior Cingulate, and Insula) as well as Brain arousal/stress systems in the extended amygdala-hippocampal areas. This suggested a potential mechanism through which yoga reduced craving and improved abstinence. Additionally, the study implied that yoga may reduce ruminations and help people relax better and thereby improve disease patho-physiology.

“Thirty-four per cent of the Indian population who suffered from chronic pain, particularly females, opted for yoga and meditation,” says a paper authored by Bhargav and his team. “Yoga may enhance pain thresholds and bring a state of natural ‘high’ by providing deep relaxation and calmness to the mind,” the paper says.





Source link

The menace of LASA drugs

The menace of LASA drugs


In India, drug regulation is lax, as noted in the book The Truth Pill which deals with the ‘myth of drug regulation in India’. Adding to that is the problem of doctors not writing prescriptions legibly, although they are required to do so by law. Overlaying these is yet another issue — that of ‘look-alike, sound-alike’, or LASA, drugs. You could, especially in situations where the pharmacist is not trained, asking for one drug and getting another.

The World Health Organisation is seized of the problem. In a technical document of October 2023, the global health watchdog notes that “Look-alike, sound-alike (LASA) medicines are a well-recognised cause of medication errors that are due to orthographic (look-alike) and phonetic (sound-alike) similarities between medicines, which can be confusing. Confusions can occur between brand-brand, brand-generic or generic-generic names.”

There are a lot of LASA drugs in India. We do not know what harm they are causing because we are not even aware of them, leave alone a study. Indian drug laws require the drug regulatory body to review a trademark search to ensure that there are no misleading brand names before granting marketing authorization for a drug. However, “The very existence of countless misleading brand names shows that India’s drug regulator, Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), is not doing what it is tasked to do,” says a recent scientific paper published in The Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia, authored by Murali Neelakantan, Parth Sharma and Ashish Kulkarni. LASA drugs may lead to significant medication errors and could quite conceivably result in harm to the patients, the paper notes, calling LASA “a significant public health threat”.

The paper gives some telling examples of drugs having same names but manufactured and marketed by different entities.

“For example, (i) brand name ‘Medzol’ is used for both Midazolam and Pantoprazole; (ii) ‘Medzole’ is used for Metronidazole oral suspension, Itraconazole capsules and Albendazole tablets; (iii) ‘Flucor’ is used for both Fluconazole and a combination of Flupentixol and Melitracen; and (iv) ‘Linamac’ is used for both Lenalidomide and Linagliptin.”

In such cases, there is no way a pharmacist could tell which drug the doctor had prescribed (in general, prescriptions in major parts of India only mention brand names with no mention of diagnosis or treatment protocol, Neelakantan et al, say.

If you check out the medindia website, you will find an astounding number of LASA drugs. Here are some examples:

These are just some examples, but the list is big. Worse, there are LASAs produced by the same manufacturer. Examples:

“Confusions can occur between brand-brand, brand-generic or generic-generic names. Organizations need to prospectively design and implement strategies to identify LASA medication errors and build a robust system that intercepts them before they result in patient harm,” says WHO.

“The regulator seems to have left it to pharma companies to fight each other in trademark battles to resolve the issue of misleading brand names,” the paper says.





Source link

Convergence of talent and AI tech will make India a powerhouse of AI, says GitHub CEO, Thomas Dohmke

Convergence of talent and AI tech will make India a powerhouse of AI, says GitHub CEO, Thomas Dohmke


Microsoft-backed developer platform GitHub has over 15.4 million developers in India, growing 33 per cent year-over-year (y-o-y). India is set to pass the US as the largest developer community on GitHub by 2027. In an interview with businessline, GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke highlighted that India’s burgeoning developer community, combined with the newfound possibilities of AI, will not only accelerate digital transformation, but will drive immense human and economic progress for India. 

With AI coming in big into coding and software development, what does it mean to be a software engineer in this day and age compared to, say, the dot com era ?

Being a software developer today means that you have to manage incredibly complex systems. You can’t imagine both your personal and professional life without software anymore. Every company today is now a software company. So developers are sitting on this ever-growing pile of software and systems, and the only way to deal with this complexity is to go to the next level. We believe AI will allow us to do so in the same way that developers have moved from punch cards to assembly language to basic programming languages like Basic and Pascal, and then to higher programming languages, to the strong adoption of open source and the adoption of the cloud. With our AI co-pilot, we are seeing productivity gains upto 55 per cent.

But if AI is already doing coding, what does the future hold for developers?

We’re not yet at the stage where AI can write all the code. While it can generate some lines, developers must take these ‘Lego blocks’ produced by AI and assemble them into a cohesive set. This process remains an art in itself. Most software doesn’t adhere to instruction booklets; it stems from the creative minds of developers, program managers, designers and others. One way to conceptualise this is through systems thinking. Developers must tackle complex issues, break them down and solve smaller problems, deciding when to leverage AI. As AI capabilities expand, it’s akin to having larger Lego blocks available. However, developers must still make decisions — like choosing a database or cloud technology, or determining whether the software should run on a mobile phone, a point-of-sale system, or a car. These decisions require human creativity, intuition and judgement. Presently, AI models lack these features and only time will reveal if we’ll ever reach that stage. Nonetheless, it’s currently inconceivable for developers to be replaced by AI. AI serves as a companion, a co-pilot, assisting with tasks that developers prefer not to handle, enabling them to focus on the creative aspects that bring value to companies.

Will AI democratise coding that will enable billions to engage with technology as easily as driving a bicycle? What does this mean for a country like India?

 I think it will impact the economy the same way the Industrial Revolution did 200 years ago. It will completely shift the way we’re thinking about productivity in our companies, and in our lives.

In India, you have a great convergence — on the one side, there’s this new technology that is in its early stages and on the other side there is a big number of computer science graduates every year. In the next few years, these two things will make India a powerhouse of AI.  What India needs is for its kids to learn coding as they learn art, science and math. There is no future where we don’t have computers around us everywhere.

Second aspect is to have clear regulation and policies, especially around large language models (LLMs). Regulation should let open source maintainers, researchers, students and teachers to do to do their work without the same compliance requirements as big companies. If I’m an individual in Bengaluru working on an open-source project, I cannot afford to also have a compliance department.

Third, companies need to invest in AI.  The time is now, the train is already leaving the station.

The developer ecosystem in India on GitHub has crossed the 15 million mark. What is driving this growth?

The accessibility of technology has become so much easier. Today, everybody has a cell phone that is connected to the Internet. We have an interconnected community of developers all around the world that work with each other, without any borders and without any boundaries. All that matters is the code and the intent that you have to contribute back. In India, people see this as an opportunity to improve their lives. It allows them to build a reputation for being an open-source software developer.

How do you see the adoption of AI by Indian companies?

We are really happy with how the AI adoption is going on and also about the opportunity that lies ahead for India to leverage. That’s part of the reason why I’m here… because we see tremendous customer interest.

How do you see the ongoing geopolitical situations such as sanctions against some countries, or the fact that China has developed its own rival to GitHub?

Open source is the only community where politics play almost no role. We are fighting for the rights of of developers everywhere

What keeps you awake and what excites you the most?

Believe it or not, some nights I’m awake because I’m so excited about the opportunity ahead. I’ve been a developer since I grew up in East Germany. I couldn’t just go and buy a computer. I had access to an East German computer in the geography lab in school. So once a week I was allowed to code a little bit. So I’m excited about the opportunity that everybody today has if they want to become a software developer. Nothing is stopping them. The Internet, the cloud, has enabled a world of collaboration, sharing and creation. Now AI is transforming this world and it’s giving everybody the same opportunity. The flip side of that is that as the systems become more complex, we also have to constantly think about securing the software supply chain which cannot be exposed by bad actors.

Published on June 11, 2024





Source link

The secret intelligence of plants

The secret intelligence of plants


Ever since Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird wrote in their book The Secret Life of Plants, about an experiment of a former CIA polygraph expert, Cleve Backster, things have never been the same in people’s thinking about plant consciousness and intelligence.

Backster hooked a polygraph (lie detector) machine to a plant, sat near it and began thinking evil thoughts, like setting fire to the plant. The polygraph “went crazy”; Backster reasoned that the plant could read his mind.

Later, when others tried the same experiment and failed, he is said to have observed that you first need to develop a rapport with the plant.

Regardless, after The Secret Life of Plants, many have developed the conviction that plants could think. Some play classical music to them to make them yield better fruits.

Zoe Schlanger — a climate report at The Atlantic and author of The Light Eaters, which explores plant intelligence — has described in an interview about an extremely interesting experiment made by Heidi Appel of the University of Ohio. Knowing that plants respond to caterpillars chewing on them by sampling the caterpillar saliva and using the information to generate the exact chemical compounds that attract parasitic wasps that kill the caterpillar by injecting their eggs into it, Heidi recorded caterpillar chewing sounds and played them to the plants. The plant responded exactly as how they would if they were being chewed by real caterpillars.

A person known to this writer once teased a young creeper by moving the support all around (over many days). After a few attempts the creeper stopped following the support, leading him to conclude that creepers have “self-respect”.

Well, the evidence on plant intelligence is far from conclusive, but perhaps enough for us to be kind to plants.





Source link

Next-generation anodes fuelling electric dreams

Next-generation anodes fuelling electric dreams


How nice it would be if one could charge the battery of an electric car and drive without a care for 1,000 km!

A battery so dense with energy that can last really long is at the heart of electric mobility. To get there, it is necessary to have energy-packed electrochemical cells (a battery is made of cells.)

When you charge a cell, the electrons from the cathode split from their parent atoms; the cathode then is left with positive-charged ions. The negatively charged electrons run along an external circuit and reach the anode; meanwhile, the ions run through the electrolyte and also reach the anode.

The crux of making a battery that lasts for 500 km is in making an anode that can accommodate a heck of a lot of ions. The more room it has for the ions, the more energy it can pack.

Today, carbon (in the form of graphite) is the anode material of choice. For cathode, the common choices are different compounds of lithium. The lithium is ‘housed’ in other materials; when its ions cross over, they again get housed in the anode, which is almost all the time. Now, the search is for anode materials that have more room to seat lithium ions. There are many known alternatives for graphite, but each comes with its own flipside — which is why graphite is still the king. But some nice flavours are emanating from research labs in the recent times. Businesses have begun to take these new anodes seriously enough to work out business models and some investments are also beginning to happen. The lithium-ion batteries that use these new anodes are called ‘Advanced Li-batteries. In this article, we will take a look at two of them.

Our old friend, Silicon

This ubiquitous stuff from sand, a big friend of mankind, in use everywhere from glass to semiconductors, is a darn good anode material. Pure silicon can accommodate ten times as many ions as graphite does. Unlike with graphite, where lithium ions embed themselves in its ‘pores’ (called ‘intercalation’), the ions form an alloy with silicon (called ‘conversion’) — where the energy is stored in the bonds between lithium and silicon.

This use of silicon has been known to scientists for over six decades. The industry has been sniffing at silicon to make anodes for about twenty years. Many companies have considered it and given it up.

Why? Because silicon has a few disadvantages. As it takes in lithium-ions while charging, it expands. While discharging, it contracts. This causes pulverisation of large silicon particles, which affects the integrity of the anode. Second, silicon has low electrical conductivity (ions do not swim through it easily, unlike in carbon). Third, it affects the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) — a protective film that quickly forms on the surface of the anode that touches the electrolyte and then permits only ions and shuts out any wandering electrons.

Due to these issues, some companies just sighed and walked away (towards the other promising anode that we will discuss later in this article.)

In a 2021 whitepaper titled ‘National Blueprint for Lithium Batteries’, the Federal Consortium for Advanced Batteries, US, does not mention the word ‘silicon’ even once. A point to note is that even batteries of today have a little bit of silicon in their anodes, to increase energy density.

The solution

Some companies, however, have been doggedly pursuing silicon to make anodes for several years now. “Many companies have tried to address the limitations of silicon as an anode in different ways,” notes Dr Rahul Gopalakrishnan, CEO at ABEE group of Belgium, “but still these are at lab level or pre-manufacturing stage, somewhere at TRL 4-6.” The Abee group is into the other type of anodes — lithium metal.

He notes that the trick is in scaling up. Leaping from lab to industry is fraught with challenges, he says. “If this bridge is crossed we will see widespread adoption of silicon as a viable alternative to graphite as an anode,” Gopalakrishnan tells quantum.

But it appears that some companies have cracked the code of scaling up.

Sicona, an Australian start-up, is building a silicon carbon anode plant in the US. Last year, the Kolkata-headquartered Himadri Speciality took a 12.8 per cent stake in Sicona.

Sicona has not given out much about its technology, but it is known that the core of its technology is based on silicon nanoparticles and a “specialised coating process to create unique material qualities.” Nano particles are so small that while they may expand and contract, they won’t pulverize — you can’t pulverize powder. Also, clearly, Sicon’s anode is not pure silicon, as it says it will deliver a 20 per cent increase in energy density.

Another notable company is the California based Sila Nanotechnologies, founded by Gene Berdichevsky, an ex-Tesla employee. Bessemer Venture and Canada Pension backed Sila describes its technology thus: “What’s required to replace graphite entirely is a material that compensates for the swelling of silicon through the design of an engineered particle structure. If you can create a particle that allows the swelling and contraction of silicon to happen inside the particle, while keeping the electrolyte outside of the particle, you could cycle the material reversibly 1,000’s of times and perhaps 10,000 times.”

Sila is already in production; in December 2023, it signed a commercial agreement with Panasonic to supply silicon anode materials. (Quantity and price have not been disclosed.)

Yet another company into silicon anode is Amprius Technologies, USA, which also speaks of silicon nanowires and special coating. Amprius says that its battery of energy density of 370 Wh/kg of silicon anode material is already commercially available; the battery is capable of “extreme fast charge”— up to 80 per cent within six minutes.

So, it does appear that silicon has been tuned for batteries.

Lithium metal

The companies that have said “to hell with silicon” have turned to the other promising anode — lithium itself. By having a copper foil on the anode end and charging, the lithium ions — instead of intercalating (graphite) or forming bonds (silicon) — just plates itself on the foil.

The beauty of a lithium metal anode (or, anode-less batteries) is its high energy density — 4,600 Wh/kg. But, as with silicon, there are issues — mainly formation of dendrites (spikes) that can pierce the electrolyte and touch the cathode. “The large scale of lithium metal also faces engineering problems such as mechanical stress by coiling and slitting, electrolyte consumption and volume swelling stress,” says a recent scientific paper. These issues are not insurmountable but they call for a new supply chain. “The commercial use of lithium metal batteries has a long way to run,” the paper notes.

Yet, as in the case of silicon, the challenges have not totally deterred businesses from trying their hand at lithium metal anodes. ABEE is an example.

Beyond lithium

Is the world resigned to having (the scarce) lithium for cathode? Not quite. Today, lithium is the best — challengers such as sodium, aluminium and zinc can at best be niche players. But you can’t rule out other equal matches for lithium. Scientists are thinking in terms of metal fluorides (iron fluoride, copper fluoride) and sulphur-based cathodes.

Research is also on to make solid electrolytes to replace the incumbent liquid — an area of research that has both strong supporters and sceptics.

The broad message is clear. In the not-too-distant future, you would be able to travel 1,000 km on one charge.





Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp