“These steps, while would reduce the timelines envisaged in completing the process, may impact the quality of the disclosures being done and increase the risk of misleading or inaccurate information,” said Sangeeta Jhunjhunwala, Partner, Khaitan Legal Associates.

 “The move is aimed at providing liquidity to issuers timely and without any regulatory hurdles, however, the interests of investors need to be also safeguarded while moving from an ‘approval-based’ to ‘intimation-based’ process,” she added.

At present, merchant bankers are tasked with conducting due diligence, preparing draft letters of offer, and documentation for filing with exchanges and Sebi. The market regulator plans doing away with some of these steps or shifting the roles to stock exchanges, and thus reducing the responsibilities. 

“Investor risks may rise in the event that merchant bankers do not conduct independent due diligence since they provide crucial experience and objectivity to the process. Moreover, issuers might not have the know-how to carry out exhaustive due diligence on their own, which could result in mistakes or oversights,” said Kunal Sharma, Partner, Singhania & Co.

Sharma added that conflict of interest may arise during validation of applications and finalisation of the basis of allotment by stock exchanges and depositories.

“If these entities are involved in both validation and allotment, they may prioritise their own or issuers interests ahead of that of investors’,” he said.

However, eliminating the appointment of merchant bankers is key for crunching the timelines.

According to the consultation paper by Sebi, merchant bankers take around 50 to 60 days to conduct due-diligence and prepare detailed offer documents. 

Sebi has proposed doing away with the requirement of due diligence certificate and filing of draft documents with the regulator.

“The responsibility for ensuring the accuracy of relevant disclosures would shift to the issuer, registrar to the issue and stock exchanges, warranting close attention to maintain the integrity of the disclosure process,” said Ketan Mukhija, Senior Partner, Burgeon Law.

To offer flexibility, Sebi has also proposed to allow renunciations of rights entitlement by shareholders to investors of their choice.

“Sebi has also proposed a very interesting framework for allotment to selective investors through renunciation by promoters or an allotment in case of under-subscription. This may potentially lead to some cannibalising of the preferential issue product, but some questions will need answering, including pricing aspects for such a transaction,” said Madhurima Mukherjee Saha, Partner, JSA Advocates & Solicitors.

Some legal players also pointed out that allowing allotment to specific investors may lead to opportunities for preferential treatment, which could diminish the rights of current shareholders.

First Published: Aug 21 2024 | 7:40 PM IST