Drunk Driver Crashes Thar Into Scooter In Delhi, Elderly Man Dead

Drunk Driver Crashes Thar Into Scooter In Delhi, Elderly Man Dead


Shyam Chand (left) died on the spot; police are searching for the accused Himanshu (right).


New Delhi:

A man crashed his Mahindra Thar SUV into a scooter at a traffic signal in Delhi’s Mayur Vihar area, killing one elderly man and leaving another critical.

The accused Himanshu, a resident of Chilla village, was driving under the influence of alcohol. Meanwhile, the elderly men Shyam Chand and Surajmal Verma were on their way to the Chilla crematorium on the scooter. Himanshu’s car hit the scooter at a traffic signal near the Crowne Plaza hotel.

While Shyam Chand died at the spot, Surajmal Verma sustained critical injuries and is undergoing treatment at the nearby Max Hospital.

The same car hit another car shortly after, before speeding off.

The police has registered a hit-and-run case and has formed a team to find the accused.

In a similar incident in Noida earlier this week, a man crashed his Thar SUV into several vehicles in the Sector 16 market after a fight with one of the shop owners. After the argument, the man drove at a high speed on the wrong side of the road, narrowly missing onlookers. He was later arrested.




Source link

Mark Carney Sworn In As New Canada PM Amid Threats To Trade, Sovereignty

Mark Carney Sworn In As New Canada PM Amid Threats To Trade, Sovereignty



Mark Carney was sworn in as Canada’s prime minister on Friday in Ottawa. Carney took oath in the office in the presence of General Mary Simon, the personal representative of King Charles.

In light of the deteriorating relations with the US under President Donald Trump’s administration, his leadership marks a significant change in the country’s political landscape. Carney, a 59-year-old former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, took the oath in both English and French, pledging allegiance to King Charles III and vowing to serve as a “faithful and true servant to his majesty”.

Carney’s defeated his rivals on Sunday in a race to become leader of the ruling Liberal Party, despite lacking prior political experience. This unprecedented move has sparked interest, especially given Carney’s background in navigating complex economic crises. His first major challenge will be addressing the strained US-Canada relations, which have hit an all-time low.

To tackle this, Carney plans to reshape his cabinet, with Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc shifting to the international trade portfolio and Innovation Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne taking over as finance minister. This strategic move aims to bolster Canada’s alliances in Europe, particularly in London and Paris, where Carney is scheduled to visit next week.

Carney replaces Justin Trudeau, who served as prime minister for over nine years. Carney’s outsider status, combined with his experience in managing crises, was seen as a major factor in his victory.

In a statement, Carney emphasised his commitment to defending Canadian sovereignty, saying he would only meet with Trump “when there is respect for Canadian sovereignty.” He also reiterated his intention to maintain retaliatory tariffs on US goods until the US demonstrates respect for Canada.

Efforts are currently underway to arrange a call between Trump and Carney, according to Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly.
 




Source link

In Putin's Ukraine Briefing, “Words Of Gratitude” For Trump, PM Modi

In Putin's Ukraine Briefing, “Words Of Gratitude” For Trump, PM Modi




Moscow/New Delhi:

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday made his first comments on Washington’s plan for a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine. During the press briefing, he started with “words of gratitude” for US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, along with other state heads, for paying attention to the Ukraine conflict despite having “a lot on our plates”.

“First of all, I would like to start with words of gratitude to the president of the United States, Mr Trump, for paying so much attention to the Ukraine settlement. All of us have lots on our plates, but many state leaders, the Chairman of the People’s Republic of China, the Prime Minister of India, president of Brazil and South African Republic. They devote a lot of time to this issue, and we are thankful to them because it’s all for the noble cause of stopping hostilities and preventing human casualties,” he said.

PM Modi, during a meeting with Trump at the White House last month, stressed that “India is not neutral” in its stand on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. “India is not neutral. India is siding with peace. I have already said to President Putin that this is not the era of war. I support the efforts taken by President Trump,” the Prime Minister had said.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and India have been stressing that this is “not an era of war but of dialogue and diplomacy”. Since the Ukraine conflict began in February last year, PM Modi has spoken to Russian President Vladimir Putin as well as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky a number of times.

The United States, meanwhile, has called for Russia to agree to the ceasefire proposal without any conditions.

Putin, however, said that while he was “for” the proposed ceasefire, but “there are nuances”, and he had “serious questions” about how it would work.

Trump said Putin’s statement was “promising” but “not complete”.

“He put out a very promising statement but it wasn’t complete,” Trump, who was meeting NATO chief Mark Rutte at the White House, told reporters when asked about Putin’s remarks.

Ukraine agreed to a US proposal for a 30-day ceasefire at talks in Saudi Arabia this week, bowing to pressure after a showdown between Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office on February 28.

Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, leaving hundreds of thousands dead and injured, displacing millions of people, reducing towns to rubble and triggering the sharpest confrontation between Moscow and the West in decades.





Source link

'Only SRK, Madhuri Not A-Lister': BJP-Congress Clash In Rajasthan Over IIFA

'Only SRK, Madhuri Not A-Lister': BJP-Congress Clash In Rajasthan Over IIFA




Jaipur:

A massive row has erupted in Rajasthan after reports claimed that the BJP-led state government spent over Rs 100 crore to organise the International Indian Film Academy (IIFA) Awards ceremony in Jaipur last weekend. Targeting the Bhajanlal Sharma government, the Opposition Congress has said it has Rs 100 crore for the film awards event, but no funds for prominent temples like Khatu Shyam Ji. Leader of the Opposition Tika Ram Jully also took a swipe that apart from Shah Rukh Khan, no A-listed actor attended the awards event.

Opposition’s Temple Jab

Addressing the Assembly, Mr Jully said the government that “chants the name of Sanatan” could not give Rs 100 crore for Khatu Shyam ji (temple) and Rs 120 crore for Govind Dev ji temple, but swiftly cleared Rs 100 crore for the IIFA ceremony.

“Passes worth Rs 7 lakh were given out for free. It was the taxpayers’ money. Mr Chief Minister, you people were busy clicking photos. What did Rajasthan gain from IIFA? The stars did not go to any tourist spots. Which big name came? Apart from Shah Rukh Khan, everyone was second-grade. When someone took actor Madhuri Dixit’s name, he replied, “She is in second grade now. Her time is over. No big film star came. When Amitabh Bachchan did not come, what is to be said.”

The Sonu Nigam Row

Mr Jully also took a dig at the state government over the absence of Sonu Nigam at the event. “What happened in one month? You called Sonu Nigam in ‘Rajasthan Rising’, but not here. Sonu Nigam should have been called. He sings well,” he said. “This should not happen, just because someone makes a suggestion, his path should not be blocked.”

The Congress leader was referring to the row over the singer’s criticism of Chief Minister Sharma and other ministers walking out during his recent performance in Jaipur. “In the middle of the show, I saw that the CM and the rest of the people left. As soon as they left, all the delegates also left. I have a request to all politicians, if you do not respect your artists, then what will the people outside do?” he had said. Sources in the Chief Minister’s Office had then told NDTV that he meant no disrespect to the performers and left the event because outdoor concerts are not allowed after 10 pm. 

In the IIFA event, Sonu Nigam was not nominated for the Best Male Playback Singer award. Sharing a screenshot of the nominations list, the ace singer posted on Instagram, “Thank you IIFA… After all you were answerable to the Rajasthan bureaucracy.”





Source link

“National Education Policy Meant To Develop Hindi, Not India”: MK Stalin

“National Education Policy Meant To Develop Hindi, Not India”: MK Stalin




Chennai:

The ‘language war‘ between Tamil Nadu and the centre – the contention that the BJP is trying to ‘impose Hindi‘ on the southern state in the guise of a National Education Policy – continued Wednesday afternoon with Chief Minister MK Stalin calling it a plan to develop Hindi rather than India.

Mr Stalin has led the state’s charge; this has included firing sharp attacks on Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, whom he last month accused of ‘blackmail’ by threatening to withhold funds and this week said was “arrogant” and “acting like a king”; after he used a pejorative to describe Tamilians.

On Wednesday evening the DMK leader stepped up his attacks, declaring at an event in Tiruvallur, “The National Education Policy is not education policy… it is a saffronisation policy.”

“The policy was not created to develop India… but to develop Hindi. We are opposing this policy as it will completely destroy the Tamil Nadu education system,” he said, emphasising what he has been saying over the past fortnight – that the centre denying Rs 2,150 crore for state-run schools, till the NEP is implemented, amounts to an attack on the nation’s federal structure.

In his speech Mr Stalin fired questions at Prime Minister Narendra Modi on this issue, claiming the centre is acting “like a dictatorship to destroy the rights of states and the federal structure”.

“You said you would give importance to states (when Mr Modi was campaigning to become the PM). But what have you done so far to give importance to federalism?” he asked, also accusing the BJP of taking “political revenge” for electoral defeats in Tamil Nadu in 2021 and 2024.

“We are asking for our share of taxes… which we paid with our efforts. What is the problem with this? Is it fair to threaten and not release funds for the welfare of 43 lakh schools? Because we don’t accept NEP, they are refusing to release funds that belong to Tamil Nadu…”

“We would have welcomed NEP if it brought everyone into education (i.e., increased school enrolment) But NEP removes people from education (i.e., the DMK claims it will disincentive Tamil students as Hindi will be ‘forced’ on them’). That is why we are opposing it…” he said.

The row over ‘Hindi imposition’ – a sensitive topic in the south, and particularly in Tamil Nadu, where ‘anti-Hindi’ riots broke out in the 1960s and which has always been opposed to the language being foisted on it – re-erupted last month with the BJP pushing its new policy.

The DMK, and its ally, the Congress, has argued Tamil Nadu – the second-largest state economy – has flourished under a two-language system that teaches Tamil and English.

The BJP, though, maintains its formula will benefit Tamil people travelling to other states.

It has said no student will be forced to learn Hindi as the third language, and has counter-accused the DMK of politicising the language issue ahead of next year’s Assembly election.

In an exclusive interview with NDTV last month, Mr Pradhan accused the DMK of creating a “false narrative” and depriving students of academic progress for their own political ends.

Much of the ‘language war’ face-off between the DMK and the BJP-led centre has revolved around Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan’s claim the Tamil party had last year agreed to set up PM SHRI, or Schools for Rising India, institutions, but later went back on its words.

This, Mr Pradhan said in Parliament on Monday, showed the DMK to be “dishonest”.

In response the DMK filed a privilege motion against the Union Minister for making “factually incorrect” statements in the House. DMK MP Kanimozhi said the state had agreed to set up these schools but with certain conditions that were, eventually, not met.






Source link

Union Minister Shares Letter By Tamil Nadu On PM SHRI Schools, DMK Holds Ground

Union Minister Shares Letter By Tamil Nadu On PM SHRI Schools, DMK Holds Ground




New Delhi:

Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan shared a letter from the Tamil Nadu school education department that said the southern state was “very keen” to set up PM SHRI Schools, as the Union Minister launched a counter-attack against the DMK over allegations that he misled parliament.

Criticising Tamil Nadu’s ruling DMK government for “playing politics” over the three-language initiative in the New Education Policy (NEP), Mr Pradhan in parliament said the party led by Chief Minister MK Stalin was “dishonest”.

“They (DMK) are dishonest. They are not committed to the students of Tamil Nadu. They are ruining the future of Tamil Nadu students. Their only job is to raise language barriers. They are doing politics. They are making mischief. They are undemocratic and uncivilised,” Mr Pradhan said in the Lok Sabha.

In response, the DMK initiated a privilege motion with its MP Kanimozhi NVN Somu requesting Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to take action for “contempt of the house”. The DMK MP’s notice said Mr Pradhan’s claim that the Tamil Nadu government took a U-turn after agreeing to sign an MoU with the Centre to accept PM SHRI Schools in the state was “factually incorrect, misleading the house and against official record.”

Mr Pradhan then posted the letter dated March 15, 2024 from the Tamil Nadu education department to prove the point he made in the house.

“… I stand by my statement made in the Parliament and am sharing the consent letter from Tamil Nadu School Education Department dated 15th March 2024. DMK MPs and Hon’ble CM can stack lies as high as they want, but the truth doesn’t bother knocking when it comes crashing down,” the Union Education Minister said.

“The DMK dispensation led by Hon’ble CM Stalin have a lot to answer to the people of Tamil Nadu. Raking the language issue as a diversionary tactic and denying facts as per their convenience will not shield their governance and welfare deficit. Why this sudden change of stance on NEP? Definitely for political brownies and reviving DMK’s political fortunes. This retrograde politics of DMK is a great disservice to the bright future of Tamil Nadu and its students,” Mr Pradhan said.

Kanimozhi, the DMK MP, today told reporters the state did agree on setting up PM SHRI Schools in Tamil Nadu, but on one condition.

“We had said that we agreed on PM SHRI Schools based on the committee recommendations, then only the [state] government would have signed the MoU,” she told reporters.

Education Minister Hits Back

Tamil Nadu Education Minister Anbil Mahesh refuted Mr Pradhan’s allegations that the state made a sudden change in its stance on PM SHRI Schools.

Mr Mahesh, pointing at the letter shared by Mr Pradhan, said it clearly mentioned that a committee will be formed and based on its finding the state would decide on implementing the Centre’s initiative.

“Those who are trying to impose the NEP are playing politics, not us. Tamil Nadu’s education model is exemplary and has consistently proven its ability to shape the future of our students,” he said. “Please understand that India’s diversity is its strength, not weakness. You should rather acknowledge and support Tamil Nadu’s right to choose what is best for the future of its children.”

The entire controversy stems from the debate over the NEP, particularly the contentious three-language policy, which Tamil Nadu strongly opposes.

“Tamil Medium Enrolments Declining”

Mr Pradhan quoting data from the Unified District Information System For Education Plus (UDISE+) said enrolments in Tamil medium dropped from 65.87 lakh in 2018-19 to 46.83 lakh in 2023-24, a reduction of over 19.05 lakh students in five years.

He said 67 per cent of students are now in English medium schools, while Tamil medium enrolment has dropped from 54 per cent (2018-19) to 36 per cent (2023-24). In government schools, English medium enrolment rose five times from 3.4 lakh to 17.7 lakh in just five years, and Tamil medium enrolment fell by 7.3 lakh in government-aided schools, reflecting a deep shift in preference.

“These numbers reveal the real story – enrolments in Tamil medium are on a continuous decline. This isn’t just a shift in language preference, it’s a colonial mindset at play. English is seen as the gateway to status and jobs, Indian languages are seen as a symbol of backwardness,” the Union Minister said.

PM SHRI School is a centrally sponsored scheme, intended to develop more than 14,500 schools managed by the central government, state, Union Territory government and local bodies including KVS and NVS.

SHRI is short for ‘Schools for Rising India’. 

The objectives include ensuring every student feels welcomed and cared for, where a safe and stimulating learning environment exists, where a wide range of learning experiences are offered, and where good physical infrastructure and appropriate resources conducive to learning are available to all students, the government says on the PM SHRI School programme website.






Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp