Elon Musk Mocks Federal Workers On X, They Get Hate Posts, Death Threats



Imagine the fear of becoming a personal target of the richest man in the world – and his followers. That’s what federal government employees are feeling after Elon Musk publicised their names.

As the co-chair of the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk has suggested mass-firings as he is publicly identifying “fake jobs” and associated federal employees on X.

Last week Elon Musk reposted the names and titles of employees holding climate-related government positions on X. These posts are made from an account with the handle Fentasyl and the name “Datahazard,”. They have received quite some negative attention with one woman even deleting her social media accounts.

According to CNN, current federal employees are apprehensive about being personal targets.

“These tactics are aimed at sowing terror and fear at federal employees. It’s intended to make them fearful that they will become afraid to speak up,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees. 

But this is Musk’s habitual way of operating where he singles out individuals who stand in his way. 

“It’s his way of intimidating people to either quit or also send a signal to all the other agencies that ‘you’re next’,” said Mary “Missy” Cummings who unintentionally provoked Musk by criticising Tesla when she was at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Cummings said that she received death threats and a slew of attacks and had to relocate temporarily before moving houses. “He intended for them, for people just like this, to be intimidated and just go ahead and quit so he didn’t have to fire them. So his plan, to some extent, is working,” she said.

One of Musk’s posts on X reads, “I don’t think the US taxpayers should pay for the employment of a ‘Director of Climate Diversification (she/her)’ at the US International Development Finance Corporation,” which he posted alongside a screenshot of the employee’s name and location.

Vivek Ramaswamy has said that, “Most federal employees, like most human beings, are fundamentally good people and deserve to be treated with respect, but the real problem is the bureaucracy”, although he did not comment on employees being singled-out by Musk.
 







Source link

No Bribery Charges Against Gautam Adani, Nephew: Adani Group On US Allegations


Adani Group said it has suffered a loss of nearly $55 billion in market capitalization. (File)

Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani, his nephew Sagar Adani, and senior executive Vneet Jain are clear of any bribery charge in the US indictment, the Adani Group has clarified. Adani Green, an Adani Group firm, has also called media reports on this as “incorrect”, in a latest stock exchange filing.

“Mr Gautam Adani, Mr Sagar Adani and Mr Vneet Jaain have not been charged with any violation of the FCPA in the counts set forth in the indictment of the US DOJ or civil complaint of the US SEC,” the Adani Group said in a statement. FCPA refers to the US Foreign Corruption Practices Act.

The indictment by the Department of Justice includes five counts, but the first and fifth counts – conspiracy to violate the FCPA and conspiracy to obstruct justice – do not mention the three directors, Gautam Adani, Sagar Adani, and Vneet Jaain, it said.

Read: “No Detail In Chargesheet Over Who Has Been Bribed”: Adani Group Lawyer Mukul Rohatgi

The Adani Group statement said that a “flawed understanding” of the US indictment led to “incorrect and reckless reporting” that the three Adani Group directors faced corruption and bribery charges.

The US indictment relies only on claims that bribes were discussed or promised. It did not offer any evidence that Indian government officials received bribes from Adani executives, the group said.

Senior lawyer Mukul Rohatgi later said in a press conference that there’s no detail in the chargesheet about who has been bribed.

“The ill-founded US action and reckless false reporting have led to significant repercussions for the Indian conglomerate, such as international project cancellations, financial market impact, and sudden examination from strategic partners, investors, and the public,” said the Adani statement.

Read: US Charges Against Adani Group Can Be Dropped After Trump Takeover: Lawyer

Adani Group has suffered a loss of nearly $55 billion in market capitalization across its 11 listed firms since the US indictment.

Here’s the full statement by Adani Group:

“Gautam Adani, nephew Sagar Adani, and senior executive Vneet Jaain are clear of any Bribery charges as per the US DoJ, according to the latest filing with the stock exchanges by a group company-Adani Green Energy Ltd. (AGEL).

In its filing, AGEL has cited the news reporting by various media houses on the bribery and corruption charges against Adani Officials as ‘Incorrect’. “Media articles which state that certain of our directors namely Mr. Gautam Adani, Mr. Sagar Adani and Mr. Vneet Jaain have been charged with violation(s) of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in the indictment. Such statements are incorrect.” Said the statement filed by Adani Green Energy Ltd. “Mr. Gautam Adani, Mr. Sagar Adani and Mr. Vneet Jaain have not been charged with any violation of the FCPA in the counts set forth in the indictment of the US DOJ or civil complaint of the US SEC,” it added.

Read: “Well-Positioned For Future”: Top Investment Firm GQG Backs Adani Group

In a legal indictment, count refers to individual charges against a defendant.

The DoJ Indictment, which has five counts, does not have any mention of and has excluded Gautam Adani, Sagar Adani or Vneet Jaain in Count One: ”Conspiracy to Violate the FCPA’; neither does it have mention of these three names in Count Five: “Conspiracy to obstruct justice” (pg 41)

The Count One of the indictment, which refers to the corruption and bribery charges, only involves Ranjit Gupta, Cyril Cabanes, Saurabh Agarwal, Deepak Malhotra and Rupesh Agarwal of Azure Power and CDPQ (Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec – a Canadian institutional investor and Azure’s largest shareholder). No Adani official has been named by DoJ under this.

However, flawed understanding of the DoJ indictment by various media-foreign as well as Indian-has led to incorrect and reckless reporting of Adani Directors of being charged with corruption and bribery under or of all five counts by the US DoJ and SEC.

Adani officials are only charged for Count 2:”Alleged securities fraud conspiracy”, Count 3:”Alleged wire fraud conspiracy”, and Count “Alleged securities fraud,”

No mention of evidence against Adani

The DoJ Indictment, offers no evidence that bribes were paid by Adani executives to Indian government officials, the indictment and the complaint solely rest on claims that bribes were promised or discussed.

“All of this is based on likelihoods and hearsay from former employees of Azure Power and CDPQ places the US DoJ’s and US SEC’s action against Adani on dangerously shaky ground – both morally and legally,” said XYZ.

The ill-founded US action and reckless false reporting have led to significant repercussions for the Indian conglomerate, such as international project cancellations, financial market impact and sudden examination from strategic partners, investors and the public.

Adani – In Direct competition with the US and Chinese Majors

Adani Group is India’s largest infrastructure players with sizeable operations in the global energy and logistics space. Over the past few years, Indian conglomerate has been expanding its operations in international markets and directly competes with several US and Chinese entities in Africa, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Israel, Australia, etc.

Since the intimation of the US DoJ Indictment, the group has suffered a loss of near US$55 Bn in its market capitalization across its 11 listed companies.”

(Disclaimer: New Delhi Television is a subsidiary of AMG Media Networks Limited, an Adani Group Company.)



Source link

“EVMs Not Tampered When You Win?” Supreme Court Says No To Paper Ballots



Supreme Court rejected the petition against EVMs or voting machines

How do you get these brilliant ideas, the Supreme Court asked a petitioner Tuesday while dismissing his petition seeking to go back to ballot paper voting in elections in the country.

During the hearing, the petitioner, KA Paul, said that even leaders like Chandrababu Naidu and YS Jagan Mohan Reddy had questioned Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) tampering.

To this the bench said what happens is, if you win the elections, EVMs or voting machines are not tampered.

“When Chandrababu Naidu or Mr Reddy lost, they say that EVMs are tampered and when they won, they don’t say anything. How can we see this? We are dismissing this. This is not the place where you argue all of this,” remarked a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and PB Varale.

Mr Paul had also sought a directive to the Election Commission to disqualify candidates for a minimum of five years if found guilty of distributing money, liquor or other material inducement to the voters during polls.

“You have interesting PILs. How do you get these brilliant ideas?” asked the top court to the petitioner, who is the president of an organisation which has rescued over three lakh orphans and 40 lakh widows.

“Why are you getting into this political arena? Your area of work is very different,” the bench said.

Mr Paul argued that EVMs could be tampered with and suggested that India should follow the practices of countries like the United States which use paper ballots instead of EVMs.

EVMs pose a threat to democracy, said Mr Paul adding that even prominent figures like Elon Musk had voiced concerns over EVM tampering.

“Why you don’t want to be different from the rest of the world?” asked the bench.

In October, while announcing the poll dates for Maharashtra and Jharkhand, Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar again underlined that the EVMs are safe and robust, questioning if there is any example anywhere in the country where there is so much thrust on disclosure and participation.

Matlab kitni baar (How many times)? Anyway,” the Chief Election Commissioner said as the EVM question was put to him yet again.

Citing the results over the last 10-15 elections, Mr Kumar said it can’t be that when results don’t go your way you start raising questions.

Kitna dikhayenge, kaun dikhata hai itna bataiye. Koi ek process comparative bataiye poori country main jahan public disclosure, disclosure, disclosure, participation, participation itna adkhik ho. Koi ek bataiye process (How much more transparent can we be, you tell me. Tell me about one comparative process where there is so much public disclosure and participation. You show me one process),” he had said.



Source link

Delhi Schools Asked To Move To “Hybrid Mode” After Top Court's Observations


All schools in the NCR had shifted to online lessons on October 18.

New Delhi:

The Delhi government on Monday directed government, private and civic body-run schools to conduct classes in “hybrid mode” – online and offline – with immediate effect, after the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) announced relaxations under the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) to mitigate educational disruptions caused by poor air quality in the National Capital Region (NCR).

All schools in the NCR had shifted to online lessons on October 18 amid a deterioration in the air quality in the area. On Monday, the Supreme Court had asked the CAQM to consider restarting physical classes in schools and colleges, noting many students lacked mid-day meals and infrastructure to attend online classes.

“Clause 11 of GRAP Stage-III, Clause 5 of GRAP Stage-IV and Clause 8 of GRAP Stage-IV (to the extent it relates to colleges, educational institutions) are relaxed to the extent that State Govts in the NCR and GNCTD shall ensure that all classes upto 12th Standard in schools and those in colleges/educational institutions are conducted in a ‘hybrid’ mode, i.e, both in ‘physical’ and also in an ‘online’ mode, wherever online mode is feasible, in the territorial jurisdiction of the NCT of Delhi and in the districts of Gurugram, Faridabad, Ghaziabad and Gautam Buddh Nagar in the NCR. The option to exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians,” a notification issued by the Directorate of Education (DoE), Government of Delhi, said.

“Accordingly, all Heads of Schools of Govt, Govt. Aided, Unaided Recognized Private Schools of DoE, NDMC (New Delhi Municipal Corporation), MCD (Municipal Corporation of Delhi) and Delhi Cantonment Board are directed to ensure compliance of the above orders with immediate effect until further orders,” it added.

On Monday, the CAQM permitted educational institutions to operate classes in a “hybrid” format, allowing students to attend either in person or online. “All classes up to 12th standard in schools and those in colleges/educational institutions are to be conducted in a ‘Hybrid’ mode, i.e., both in ‘physical’ and ‘online’ mode, wherever online mode is feasible,” the CAQM announced.

The development came hours after the Supreme Court directed the CAQM to review GRAP restrictions in light of their impact on education. The court also emphasised the need to prioritise education while raising several concerns.

“A large number of students are being deprived of the facility of mid-day meals as schools and anganwadis are closed. A large number of students do not have the facilities to take advantage of online education. Many educational institutions do not have the facilities to provide online education,” the court said.

Additionally, the court observed, “The residences of many students do not have air purifiers, and therefore, there may not be any difference between children sitting at home and those attending school.”

The air quality remained alarming on Monday, with the Capital’s 24-hour average Air Quality Index (AQI) reading soaring to 349 from 318 the previous day, according to the Central Pollution Control Board’s 4pm bulletin.



Source link

India vs Australia LIVE Score, 1st Test, Day 4: Mohammed Siraj Strikes Early, Australia Staring At Humiliation At Perth | Cricket News


India vs Australia 1st Test LIVE Scorecard: India need 7 wickets to win Perth Test.© AFP




IND vs AUS LIVE Score, 1st Test Day 4: Usman Khawaja and Steve Smith will be resuming the proceedings for Australia on Day 4 of the first Test against India. The duo need to form a stable partnership, in order to keep Australia alive in the mammoth run chase. On the other hand, India bowlers are eyeing some quick wickets to bundle out the hosts at the earliest. India are seven wickets away from winning the Perth Test against Australia and taking a commanding 1-0 lead in the five-match series. Set to chase an improbable target of 534, Australia were reduced to 12/3 at the end of stumps on Day 3 by the visitors. (Live Scorecard)

Here are the Live Updates of India vs Australia 1st Test Match Day 4, Straight from Optus Stadium, Perth







  • 07:59 (IST)

    IND vs AUS 1st Test Day 4, Live: OUT

    OUT!!! And the journey begins as Mohammed Siraj takes his second wicket of the innings and this time, he removes Usman Khawaja for 4. That’s a bizarre dismissal as Siraj offers some bounce and Khawaja gets bamboozled in search of a big hit. Khawaja fails to time the shot as the ball goes up in the air and wicketkeeper Rishabh Pant takes an excellent catch behind the stumps. Fourth wicket gone for Australia. 

    AUS 17/4 (5.3 overs)

  • 07:52 (IST)

    IND vs AUS 1st Test Day 4, Live: We are underway

    The play on Day 4 of the first Test between India and Australia begins. For Australia, Usman Khawaja and Steve Smith will be resuming the proceedings from 12/3. Currently, the hosts need 522 runs more to win the first match while India are just seven wickets away from victory. On the other hand, Jasprit Bumrah will be bowling the first over of the day for the visitors. Let’s play!! 

  • 07:37 (IST)

    IND vs AUS 1st Test Day 4, Live: Jaiswal-Kohli’s impressive run

    The 22-year-old Yashasvi Jaiswal, on Sunday, emerged as the unofficial flag-bearer of Indian batting for the next decade and a half during his 297-ball stay at the wicket, giving a glimpse of his ever-improving technique and composed temperament. But it was veteran Virat Kohli, who showed how to play on a wicket that consistently misbehaved during his second hundred at the Perth Stadium and 30th overall, which incidentally took him past Sir Don Bradman’s 29 Test tons.

  • 07:33 (IST)

    IND vs AUS 1st Test Day 4, Live: Bumrah’s masterclass

    India stand-in skipper Jasprit Bumrah delivered as per the expectations as he scalped two wickets in the form of Nathan McSweeney (0) and Marnus Labuschagne (3) on the cusp on the stumps on Day 3. Apart from him, Mohammed Siraj also dismissed the nightwatchman Pat Cummins for 2. 

  • 07:28 (IST)

    IND vs AUS 1st Test Day 4, Live: Australia struggling at 12/3

    The Indians dominated the third day to first set an improbable 534-run target for the hosts before reducing them to 12/3 at close of play. Once Kohli reached an unprecedented seventh Test century Down Under, Indian skipper Jasprit Bumrah declared at 487 for 6 with five overs to go flat out.

  • 07:18 (IST)

    IND vs AUS 1st Test Day 4, Live: India’s dominance on Day 3

    Virat Kohli brought all his technical expertise into play while dealing with vagaries of variable bounce during his 30th hundred after heir apparent Yashasvi Jaiswal’s classy 161 put India in sight of a remarkable Test victory against a nervous and fumbling Australia. 

  • 07:14 (IST)

    IND vs AUS 1st Test Day 4, Live: Hello

    Hello and welcome to our live coverage of Day 4 of the first Test between India and Australia, straight from the Optus Stadium in Perth. Stay tuned for all the live updates. 

Topics mentioned in this article



Source link

Should Former Judges Join Politics? What Ex Chief Justice DY Chandrachud Said


DY Chandrachud retired earlier this month as the Chief Justice of India. (File)

New Delhi:

The society continues to view former judges as custodians of the law and their lifestyle must accord with the sense of faith the society has in the legal system, said DY Chandrachud, former Chief Justice of India when asked if retired judges should join politics.

Asked if he would ever join politics himself, he asserted he would not do anything after the age of 65 which would cast an element of doubt on his work and the integrity of the judicial system.

“The society continues to look at you as a judge even when you lay down office. Therefore, things that are alright for other citizens, the society expects would not be alright for judges to do, even when they cease to be in office,” he said at NDTV’s Samvidhan@75 conclave.

Read: Judiciary Has No Exclusive Role In Collegium System. DY Chandrachud Explains

Justice Chandrachud, who retired earlier this month after serving as the country’s top judge for two years, clarified he was not casting an aspersion on judges who joined politics in the past.

“It is for every judge to take a call on whether a decision that they take after retirement will have a bearing on how people assess the work they did as a judge. If you join politics right after retirement, it may give rise to a certain perception on the members of the society on what was the extent to which his judicial work was influenced by the politics he adapted,” he added.

Acknowledging the role that the judicial institution has played in his career, he said, “Whatever a former judge does – his behaviour or personal lifestyle – must accord with the sense of faith the society has in your institution.”

Read: “Always Stable, Always Solid”: DY Chandrachud Praises This Retired Cricketer

He said judges are also private citizens and are entitled to the same rights that any other citizen gets, but society expects a higher standard of behaviour from them. “There should be some element of consensus within the judiciary on what is acceptable and what not is acceptable. That consensus has still not evolved,” he added.

He also suggested that sitting judges may discuss with former judges what is most appropriate for retired judges to do.



Source link