Niva Bupa Health Insurance posts Q3 net loss of Rs 87.64 crore, gross premium rises 55%

Niva Bupa Health Insurance posts Q3 net loss of Rs 87.64 crore, gross premium rises 55%


The insurer posted an operating loss of ₹135.53 crore in Q3FY25

Standalone health insurer Niva Bupa Health Insurance on Thursday reported a net loss of ₹87.64 crore for the third quarter this fiscal as against ₹13.24 crore net profit for the same period last fiscal.

The insurer posted an operating loss of ₹135.53 crore in Q3FY25 compared with an operating profit of ₹3.41 crore in Q3FY26, according to a stock exchange filing. Net premium written during the period under review grew 22.51 per cent y-o-y at ₹1,766.70 crore from ₹1,152.43 crore in the year-ago period.

The insurer’s expenses of management (EoM) ratio improved to 33.10 per cent from 41.73 per cent in Q3FY25. Combined ratio remained flat at 108.19 per cent as against 108.29 per cent in the same period last fiscal.

Solvency ratio

In the third quarter of FY26 solvency ratio stood at 2.49 compared with 3.03 in the corresponding period of FY25.

On a reported basis (with 1/n accounting impact), the company’s gross written premium (GWP) grew 55 per cent y-o-y to ₹2,231 crore in the third quarter from ₹1,442 crore in the year-ago period.

For the first nine months of the current financial year (9MFY26) GWP stood at ₹5,706 crore, registering a 22 per cent growth y-o-y. The health insurer said its customer base continued to show robust 23 per cent year-on-year growth, with the number of lives insured increasing to 24.5 million as of December, 2025.

Commenting on the results, Krishnan Ramachandran, MD & CEO, Niva Bupa said, “Our Q3FY26 performance reflects the strength of our growth strategy, increasing relevance in the retail health insurance market, and sustained focus on profitability. As we continue to scale responsibly, we remain committed to improving customer outcomes while building a resilient and profitable health insurance franchise.”

Published on January 29, 2026



Source link

Cupid net triples in Q3, to issue 4:1 bonus shares

Cupid net triples in Q3, to issue 4:1 bonus shares


Cupid has reported that its December quarter net profit increased three times to ₹33 crore (₹11 crore) driven by strong execution, healthy demand and sustained momentum across its businesses.

Income more than doubled to ₹104 crore (₹51 crore) in the quarter under review. EBITDA was more than doubled to ₹34 crore.

The company has also announced that its Board has approved a proposal for the issuance of bonus equity shares in the ratio of 4:1.

Shareholders will receive four fully paid-up equity shares for every one equity share held by them as on the record date, which will be announced in due course.

The bonus issue follows a comprehensive evaluation of Cupid’s capital structure, growth trajectory and shareholder base composition, it said.

The bonus issue is expected to improve stock affordability by proportionately reducing the per-share price, thereby making Cupid’s equity more accessible to retail investors, it said.

This enhanced accessibility is anticipated to broaden the company’s investor base and encourage greater retail participation in the company’s equity.

Additionally, the increased number of shares in circulation is expected to improve trading liquidity, providing existing shareholders with greater flexibility in portfolio management.

Aditya Kumar Halwasiya, Chairman and Managing Director said the December quarter performance was the strongest in Cupid’s history, driven by disciplined execution and strong momentum across businesses.

The order book is at an all-time high, providing clear revenue visibility and confidence in sustained performance ahead, he added.

The company continues to strengthen its overseas presence, including in the GCC region, while capacity expansion at the Palava manufacturing facility is progressing as planned in line with the growth roadmap, he said.

To accelerate FMCG growth, the company plans to enter the UAE and Saudi market soon.

“We are confident of exceeding FY26 revenue guidance of ₹335 crore, with net profit expected to exceed ₹100 crore,” he said

The Board evaluated the bonus issue thoughtfully, keeping long-term value creation at the center, said Halwasiya.

Published on January 29, 2026



Source link

Q3 Results 29th Jan Highlights: ITC Q3 net falls 6%, Tata Motors Q3 profit down y-o-y, Swiggy loss widens in Q3, Vedanta, Gillette, Wheels India, Canara Bank & IEX Q3 profit up, Adani Power, Blue Star & KPIT Tech profit down, Dabur India profit up 7%, Voltas profit slides 35.4%

Q3 Results 29th Jan Highlights: ITC Q3 net falls 6%, Tata Motors Q3 profit down y-o-y, Swiggy loss widens in Q3, Vedanta, Gillette, Wheels India, Canara Bank & IEX Q3 profit up, Adani Power, Blue Star & KPIT Tech profit down, Dabur India profit up 7%, Voltas profit slides 35.4%


Result at a Glance_January 28, 2026

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 49904.1 cr. Vs. Rs. 38764.3 cr. YoY, Rs. 42344.2 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 5573.1 cr. Vs. Rs. 5076.5 cr. YoY, Rs. 5086.0 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 11.2% Vs. 13.1% YoY, 12.0% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 3879.1 cr. Vs. Rs. 3726.9 cr. YoY, Rs. 3349.0 cr. QoQ.

Bharat Electronics Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 7153.9 cr. Vs. Rs. 5770.7 cr. YoY, Rs. 5792.1 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 2127.2 cr. Vs. Rs. 1669.5 cr. YoY, Rs. 1702.2 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 29.7% Vs. 28.9% YoY, 29.4% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 1579.7 cr. Vs. Rs. 1311.6 cr. YoY, Rs. 1287.2 cr. QoQ.

TVS Motor Company Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 14755.5 cr. Vs. Rs. 11034.9 cr. YoY, Rs. 14051.2 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 2270.2 cr. Vs. Rs. 1654.2 cr. YoY, Rs. 2122.4 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 15.4% Vs. 15.0% YoY, 15.1% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 891.3 cr. Vs. Rs. 604.9 cr. YoY, Rs. 832.8 cr. QoQ.

The Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 1567.8 cr. Vs. Rs. 949.4 cr. YoY, Rs. 1629.3 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. -42.9 cr. Vs. Rs. 31.5 cr. YoY, Rs. 39.5 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at -2.7% Vs. 3.3% YoY, 2.4% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. -67.9 cr. Vs. Rs. 8.0 cr. YoY, Rs. 20.9 cr. QoQ.

Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. (C)

NII at Rs. 3213.8 cr. Vs. Rs. 2621.9 cr. YoY, Rs. 2828.5 cr. QoQ.

Net Profit at Rs. 825.6 cr. Vs. Rs. 917.6 cr. YoY, Rs. 566.1 cr. QoQ.

ACC Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 6483.0 cr. Vs. Rs. 5971.8 cr. YoY, Rs. 5931.7 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 700.0 cr. Vs. Rs. 1115.7 cr. YoY, Rs. 845.7 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 10.8% Vs. 18.7% YoY, 14.3% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 404.3 cr. Vs. Rs. 1091.8 cr. YoY, Rs. 1119.3 cr. QoQ.

TVS Holdings Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 15275.6 cr. Vs. Rs. 11359.2 cr. YoY, Rs. 14549.2 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 2463.7 cr. Vs. Rs. 1837.0 cr. YoY, Rs. 2273.1 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 16.1% Vs. 16.2% YoY, 15.6% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 969.4 cr. Vs. Rs. 681.0 cr. YoY, Rs. 880.1 cr. QoQ.

Gland Pharma Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 1695.4 cr. Vs. Rs. 1384.1 cr. YoY, Rs. 1486.9 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 434.9 cr. Vs. Rs. 360.0 cr. YoY, Rs. 313.9 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 25.7% Vs. 26.0% YoY, 21.1% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 261.5 cr. Vs. Rs. 204.7 cr. YoY, Rs. 183.7 cr. QoQ.

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd. (S)

Net Revenue at Rs. 1895.7 cr. Vs. Rs. 1271.0 cr. YoY, Rs. 1677.4 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 171.9 cr. Vs. Rs. 75.6 cr. YoY, Rs. 156.2 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 9.1% Vs. 5.9% YoY, 9.3% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 170.8 cr. Vs. Rs. 98.2 cr. YoY, Rs. 153.8 cr. QoQ.

Pine Labs Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 744.3 cr. Vs. Rs. 601.6 cr. YoY, Rs. 649.9 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 132.0 cr. Vs. Rs. 76.9 cr. YoY, Rs. 75.4 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 17.7% Vs. 12.8% YoY, 11.6% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 42.4 cr. Vs. Rs. -56.7 cr. YoY, Rs. 6.0 cr. QoQ.

Craftsman Automation Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 2057.3 cr. Vs. Rs. 1576.1 cr. YoY, Rs. 2001.6 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 312.2 cr. Vs. Rs. 199.0 cr. YoY, Rs. 301.9 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 15.2% Vs. 12.6% YoY, 15.1% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 107.1 cr. Vs. Rs. 12.9 cr. YoY, Rs. 90.9 cr. QoQ.

Aditya Birla Real Estate Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 81.2 cr. Vs. Rs. 204.4 cr. YoY, Rs. 97.8 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. -89.1 cr. Vs. Rs. -18.0 cr. YoY, Rs. -70.1 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at -109.7% Vs. -8.8% YoY, -71.6% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. -107.4 cr. Vs. Rs. -30.2 cr. YoY, Rs. -73.1 cr. QoQ.

V-Guard Industries Ltd. (C)

Net Revenue at Rs. 1403.5 cr. Vs. Rs. 1268.7 cr. YoY, Rs. 1340.9 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA at Rs. 123.2 cr. Vs. Rs. 104.1 cr. YoY, Rs. 109.3 cr. QoQ.

EBITDA Margin at 8.8% Vs. 8.2% YoY, 8.1% QoQ

Net Profit at Rs. 57.1 cr. Vs. Rs. 60.2 cr. YoY, Rs. 65.3 cr. QoQ.



Source link

Hindustan Zinc launches ‘Zinc Moolya’ a live rupee pricing module on Vedanta Metal Bazaar

Hindustan Zinc launches ‘Zinc Moolya’ a live rupee pricing module on Vedanta Metal Bazaar


Hindustan Zinc Limited, one of the world’s largest integrated zinc producers and amongst the top five silver producers globally, has launched ‘Zinc Moolya’, an Indian rupee (INR) live pricing module on its flagship metal e-commerce platform, Vedanta Metal Bazaar (VMB).

Designed to democratise access to metal pricing, ‘Zinc Moolya’ enables businesses across India, particularly MSMEs and small-volume buyers, to view, book and lock transparent, real-time metal prices in the INR aligned with global benchmarks, said a company statement.

Launched in 2022, Vedanta Metal Bazaar (VMB) is India’s first online metal marketplace for metal procurement. It offers a seamless digital experience, allowing buyers to access live prices, place orders and manage end-to-end transactions with transparency. Trusted by thousands of businesses nationwide, VMB has emerged as a transformative force in reshaping how metals are sourced across India, the company said.

LME-linked

‘Zinc Moolya’ marks a significant enhancement to the platform’s capabilities. It provides live landed prices in INR, dynamically linked to the London Metal Exchange (LME), ensuring accurate and up-to-date price discovery. 

“In a market where volatility in the INR–USD exchange rate often makes it challenging for small and mid-sized businesses to accurately fix their raw material costs, Zinc Moolya addresses a critical issue by enabling pricing certainty directly in Indian rupees,” the statement said. 

This will help MSMEs and emerging enterprises to participate more actively in the metals market, enabling faster decision-making, improved competitiveness and stronger integration into domestic and global value chains.

Arun Misra, CEO of Hindustan Zinc, said, “With the introduction of Zinc Moolya on Vedanta Metal Bazaar, we are fundamentally reshaping how metals are bought in India by removing entry barriers that have traditionally favoured scale… At Hindustan Zinc, we see digital innovation as a nation-building tool…one that strengthens trust, improves competitiveness, and enables India’s manufacturing ecosystem to grow with confidence and resilience.”

The initiative aligns with the national vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat, strengthening India’s industrial backbone while reducing information asymmetry and enhancing trust in commodity procurement, it said.

Hindustan Zinc’s portfolio, serving 40 countries, includes London Metal Exchange (LME) registered products such as Special High-Grade Zinc, High-Grade Zinc, EcoZen – low-carbon ‘green’ zinc, Prime Western Zinc, Continuous Galvanizing Grade Zinc, High-Grade Jumbo Zinc, and die-casting alloys (Alloy 3 and Alloy 5), along with Special High-Grade Lead. 

Published on January 29, 2026



Source link

Indian jewellers stop taking advance orders on volatile gold, silver movements

Indian jewellers stop taking advance orders on volatile gold, silver movements


On Thursday, gold opened ₹1,100 a gm higher than the previous day closing, throwing jewellers off balance
| Photo Credit:
MURALI KUMAR K

Soaring prices of gold and silver are creating operational challenges for jewellers, who are hesitant to book advance orders from customers in view of the volatile movements.

On Thursday, gold opened ₹1,100 a gm higher than the previous day closing, throwing jewellers off balance. Silver, too, quoted higher by over ₹27,500 a kg. Gold, which opened at ₹1,76,121 per 10 gm, ended at ₹1,75,340 against previous closing of ₹1,64,635. Silver eased to ₹3,79,988 a kg from ₹3,85,933 against ₹3,58,267. 

Prithviraj Kothari, Managing Director at RiddiSiddhi Bullions Ltd and President of India Bullion and Jewellers Association Ltd, said the sharp surge in gold and silver prices created real operational challenges for jewellers. 

No advance booking

“Extreme volatility makes it difficult to quote prices, lock orders, or manage inventory risk, as even small intraday moves can wipe out margins. Many jewellers are seeing customers defer purchases, renegotiate orders, or shift to lighter designs due to uncertainty around prices,” he said. 

“No one is taking advance booking as prices have soared. It is difficult to take a booking in a situation like today when gold price went up by over ₹1,000 a gm,” said All-Kerala Gold & Silver Merchants Association General Secretary S Abdul Nazar

N Anantha Padmanabhan, managing director of Chennai-based NAC Jewellers, said jewellers are now seeking 100 per cent payment for gold jewellery orders from customers. 

“We are asking for at least 50 per cent advance when customers book orders with us,” said  S Abdul Nazar. 

“After every sale, we have to replenish our gold stocks. We are buying gold every 2-3 hours and find prices fluctuating every minute,” said Anantha Padmanabhan. 

Reasons for the surge

Traders said they were finding it difficult to manage the daily volatility in the precious metals complex. Gold has increased by nearly 12 per cent this week and silver by over 25 per cent. 

Nazar said purchases of precious metals have slowed in view of the volatile situation. “Jewellery gold ruled at ₹99,000 per sovereign (8 gm) on January 1. Today, it is at ₹1,31,000. Over the past two years, gold’s rise was gradual. But today, it is rising by ₹300-500 every day,” he said. 

At the same time, higher working capital requirements and hedging costs are adding pressure. While long-term demand remains intact, in the near term, elevated prices and rapid swings are disrupting order flows and forcing jewellers to adopt a far more cautious, just-in-time approach to bookings, said Kothari.

Gold and silver prices have been rising in line with global trends. Globally, precious metals are soaring due to investors’ flight from currencies and bonds, geopolitical crises, US trade disputes with various nations and uncertainty over the US Fed’s policies.

Over the past year, gold prices have nearly doubled, while silver rates have nearly tripled.  

Published on January 29, 2026



Source link

Banks’ Q4 NIM to remain range-bound as repo cut transmission occurs on MCLR-linked loans

Banks’ Q4 NIM to remain range-bound as repo cut transmission occurs on MCLR-linked loans


ICICI Banks’ NIM stood at 4.30 per cent in Q3, flat sequentially. Federal Bank’s NIM improved 12 bps sequentially to 3.18 per cent in Q3. 
| Photo Credit:
FRANCIS MASCARENHAS

Banks are likely to see their net interest margin (NIM) remain range-bound sequentially, with possible downward bias, as the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) 25 basis points (bps) repo rate cut transmission in December occurs on the lending side, especially on loans which are linked to marginal cost of funds based lending rate (MCLR) benchmark which re-prices after a lag.

Sandeep Batra- ED, ICICI Bank, said he expects NIMs to remain ‘more or less range-bound’ going ahead, reflecting the repricing of the external benchmarks on loans and investments. And of course, competition intensity.

“This would get offset by retail term deposit repricing, and we will continue to watch the market conditions, and if there are any further changes in monetary policy, that will impact the NIM trajectory. From our perspective, we are focused on maximising all levers of profits, and where NIM is certainly one of the important levers,” he said. ICICI Banks’ NIM stood at 4.30 per cent in Q3, flat sequentially.

KVS Manian, MD, CEO, Federal Bank, said as the bank is changing the mix of its liability profile, increasing low-cost current account and savings account (CASA) share in overall deposits, and growing medium yield assets faster than the low yielding ones.

“I think we hope to continue this journey for many more quarters to go. Of course, there will be an immediate quarter, you will see the impact of the last rate cut play out. So, we have to keep that in mind in the next quarter (Q4). A large part of the last rate cut will play out in the next quarter. Of course, we have to try and mitigate that as we have tried in the last few quarters. We will attempt to do our best. But I don’t think that journey is anywhere close to the peak of what we want to get,” he said. Federal Bank’s NIM improved 12 bps sequentially to 3.18 per cent in Q3.

“NIMs will remain range-bound in this quarter because banks have let go-off the low yield assets, and are aiming for higher yielding assets to protect interest yields. Banks are also not raising high cost bulk deposit significantly, to protect margins. We expect these trends to continue over the next 1-2 quarters,” said Sanjay Agarwal, Senior Director, CareEdge Rating.

However, on a longer term basis, the downward pressure on lending yields and resistance in deposit yields is likely to ensure that NIMs would remain capped, he added.

Published on January 29, 2026



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp