Open to Chinese investments despite border clashes: Rajeev Chandrasekhar

Open to Chinese investments despite border clashes: Rajeev Chandrasekhar



India is open to investments from Chinese companies, Minister of State for Information and IT Rajeev Chandrasekhar said in an interview with Financial Times (FT) on Wednesday.


“We are open to doing business with any company anywhere as long as they are investing and conducting their business lawfully and are in compliance with the Indian laws,” Chandrasekhar told the FT, adding that India was “open to all investment, including Chinese”.


New Delhi ramped up scrutiny of Chinese businesses after a 2020 clash in the Galwan Valley between the two countries. At least 24 Indian troops were killed in the clashes. Since then, India has banned more than 300 Chinese apps, including TikTok. India has also intensified scrutiny of investments by Chinese firms.


The Centre has launched regulatory probes against Chinese mobile manufacturers Xiaomi, Oppo, and Vivo, claiming that the companies violated Indian tax and foreign exchange rules.


Chandrasekhar also said that the tightening of foreign investments did not target China and it applied to other neighbouring countries as well including Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal.


“I don’t think it’s anything very unique or to do with Galwan as much as it is a general trend of countries of the world waking up to the concern of having their backbone networks, tech ecosystems not necessarily trusted,” he told FT.


India has also been attracting foreign investments from companies pursuing the “China plus one” strategy. This is especially focussed on the technology sector including semiconductors and smartphones.


Apple has already started increasing the production of iPhones in India. It is also expected that AirPods will also be soon made here.


Earlier this month, The Economic Times (ET) reported that India has rejected Chinese automaker BYD’s proposal to set up a $1 billion factory in partnership with Hyderabad-based Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Ltd.


FT, however, reported that the application is “pending and still valid”.



Source link

Women workers to be impacted more than men by AI wave, says McKinsey

Women workers to be impacted more than men by AI wave, says McKinsey



By Rich Miller


Women have more to worry about than men from a coming wave of automation and artificial intelligence that could replace almost a third of hours worked across the US economy.

 


That’s one of the takeaways from a new report by the research arm of consultants McKinsey & Co. that examines US labor-market trends through the end of 2030. 


It calculated that women are 1.5 times more likely to need to move into a new occupation than men during that period. The reason: They’re over-represented in the industries with lower-wage jobs the report reckons will be most impacted by automation, including office support and customer service. Blacks and Hispanics will also be adversely affected as demand for food and production workers shrinks.


In all, the McKinsey Global Institute said that at least 12 million workers in the US will need to change occupations by the end of 2030. Some of that turnover will stem from the drive for net-zero emissions, which will disrupt millions of jobs.  


What’s concerning, said Institute director Kweilin Ellingrud, is that the churn will be concentrated among low-wage workers. They’re up to 14 times more likely to need to change occupations than those in the highest-wage positions, and most will need additional skills to do so successfully.


White-collar workers – everything from lawyers and teachers to financial advisers and architects — will be among those most affected by the spread of generative artificial intelligence such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, according to the report. But McKinsey argued that will largely result in changes in how those jobs are carried out, rather than in the destruction of huge swathes of positions.


It “probably won’t be that kind of catastrophic thing,” institute partner Michael Chui said. But “it is going to change almost every job.”


Some 3.5 million positions could be wiped out as the US seeks to end emissions of greenhouse gases, with workers in oil and gas production and automotive manufacturing taking the hit, according to the report. 


But McKinsey argued that will be more than offset – to the tune of about 700,000 jobs — by gains stemming from the build-up of renewable energy, primarily though capital investments in new plants, charging stations and the like.  


The energy transition, coupled with stepped-up government spending on infrastructure, will increase demand for construction workers who are already in short supply. McKinsey sees construction employment growing 12% from 2022 through 2030.


If the reshuffling of jobs in coming years is handled correctly, it could result in a huge increase in US productivity and prosperity, according to the institute. In what Ellingrud admitted was a “pretty optimistic” scenario, the report posits an eventual rise in annual productivity growth to 3% to 4%. It’s about 1% now.


To get there, though, “the US will need workforce development on a far larger scale,” McKinsey said.


© 2023 Bloomberg L.P.



Source link

Microsoft posts .1 bn quarterly profit as it promises to lead ‘AI shift’

Microsoft posts $20.1 bn quarterly profit as it promises to lead ‘AI shift’



Microsoft on Tuesday reported fiscal fourth-quarter profit of $20.1 billion, or $2.69 per share, beating analyst expectations for $2.55 per share.


It posted revenue of $56.2 billion in the April-June period, up 8 per cent from last year. Analysts had been looking for revenue of $55.49 billion, according to FactSet Research.


CEO Satya Nadella said the company remains focused on leading the new AI platform shift.


Organizations are asking not only how but how fast they can apply this next generation of AI to address the biggest opportunities and challenges they face safely and responsibly, he said in a prepared statement.


Microsoft was an early mover in this year’s hype around generative AI tools that can help people write documents and create new images and other media. It capitalized on its multibillion dollar investments in ChatGPT-maker OpenAI to launch a chatbot for Microsoft’s Bing search engine and similar tools tailored to its business customers.


Macquarie analyst Sarah Hindlian-Bowler said investors have been focused on Microsoft’s early revenue from those AI investments, the performance of the Azure cloud computing platform and the likelihood that Microsoft will close its deal to buy video game company Activision Blizzard, which could help boost gaming revenue and drive more users to the Xbox game system and other Microsoft platforms.


More than 18 months after announcing the $69 billion deal, Microsoft is still negotiating with a British antitrust regulator over concerns it will harm competition. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission also opposed the transaction but lost a court fight to stop it.


We still expect a successful close as the company works toward an amenable solution that satisfies the U.K.’s concerns, Hindlian-Bowler said in an analyst note ahead of Tuesday’s earnings.


Microsoft doesn’t reveal the total revenue for its Azure business, though a document inadvertently disclosed during its recent court fight with the FTC showed it as $34 billion last year, Hindlian-Bowler said. Microsoft has declined to comment on that number.


While AI has captivated the attention of the public and investors, Microsoft is also still heavily reliant on its personal computing business centered around the licensing fees paid by the makers of computers running its Windows software.


Worldwide PC sales in the April-June quarter dropped 16.6 per cent from the same time last year, marking the seventh consecutive quarter of year-over-year decline, according to market research group Gartner. However, the market is starting to stabilize and demand could grow again in 2024, Gartner said.


Microsoft has laid off hundreds of workers in recent months, including many around its headquarters in Redmond, Washington, according to notices it sent to government agencies. That’s on top of the 10,000 employees, almost 5 per cent of its workforce, that it cut earlier this year.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Star founder Raveendran broke down in tears as crises engulfed Byju’s

Star founder Raveendran broke down in tears as crises engulfed Byju’s



By Anto Antony


In late April, Indian officials in plainclothes raided the Bengaluru offices of Byju’s, seizing laptops and publicly linking the world’s most valuable education-technology startup with possible foreign exchange violations.

 


An ocean away, Byju Raveendran, the firm’s eponymous founder and chief executive, paced his condo in Dubai, downing cups of black coffee and fielding calls from top investors. With a planned $1 billion equity fundraise from Middle Eastern investors still in limbo, Raveendran broke down in tears defending his company, according to people who attended the calls.


Raveendran had been in crisis mode for months. Apart from the raid by India’s financial crime-fighting agency, his once high-flying tutoring startup failed to file its financial accounts on time. Several US-based investors accused Byju’s of hiding half a billion dollars, prompting lawsuits.


On Tuesday, Prosus NV, one of the company’s earliest investors, said it had given up its board seat because of poor governance and disregard for directors’ advice.


Byju’s and Raveendran have denied wrongdoing. But their tale — pieced together from interviews with more than a dozen people involved in the firm’s operations — is a window into challenges facing India’s startups. With limited domestic venture capital, firms like Byju’s have looked outward for support. That changed last year, when startup funding took a hit, falling to a four-year low by the first half of 2023.


Without easy access to global capital, companies are now facing greater scrutiny over corporate governance, jeopardizing India’s quest to pull even with the US and China as a tech capital of the world.


“If the situation is not contained quickly and guardrails are not put in place at Byju’s, it will affect India’s image as an investment destination among overseas funds,” said Jacob Mathew, a chairman of investment banking at Incred Capital Ltd.


Raveendran’s rise from a private tutor to the leader of a $22 billion company captivated global investors, including Sequoia Capital, Blackstone Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg’s foundation. During the pandemic, Raveendran cornered a majority of the ed-tech market in India.


But after classrooms reopened, concerns about Byju’s finances pricked at the firm’s reputation. Investors questioned why Raveendran delayed hiring a chief financial officer for years and acquired more than a dozen companies across the world at break-neck speed. Scores of employees have either left or been fired. Board members have resigned. And many teaching centers are nearly empty.


Raveendran’s supporters attribute missteps to the enthusiasm and naivete of an inexperienced founder who grew too quickly. Critics say he acted recklessly by withholding information about finances and failing to rigorously audit accounts. In India’s startup world, many see Byju’s as the highest-profile example of what happens when a business scales one of the fastest-growing economies during a boom — but fails to plan for a bust. 


Raveendran and a spokesperson for Byju’s declined to comment.


Unusual Beginnings

 


Raveendran grew up in a village in the coastal state of Kerala and attended a local school where his father taught physics and his mother math. He was an unconventional student, according to people who knew him at the time, skipping classes to play football and preferring to teach himself at home.


After briefly working as an engineer, Raveendran began coaching students at a college in Bengaluru. Enrollment doubled every week, and Raveendran eventually moved classes into a sports stadium. Lessons were projected onto giant screens for thousands of students.


Raveendran’s teaching methods stood out in India, where good instructors are scarce and methodologies antiquated. He was adept at preparing students for fiercely competitive entrance exams to premier engineering and medical colleges.


Raveendran recruited his best students to teach alongside him and opened 41 coaching centers. In 2011, he registered Think and Learn Pvt Ltd. —  the parent company of Byju’s. He co-founded the firm with Divya Gokulnath, a biotech engineer and former student whom he later married.


In 2015, Raveendran digitized his business, launching a self-learning app focused largely on math, science and English for primary school students.


“I’ve always enjoyed learning things on my own and also taught myself to hack exams, so it was easy to tutor others,” Raveendran said in a 2017 interview with Bloomberg News.


Surge in Cash

 


As tech spending surged during the late 2010s, investors lined up to support Raveendran.


Ranjan Pai, who runs one of the nation’s largest healthcare and education empires, said he agreed almost immediately to fund Byju’s. Raveendran capitalized on a spike in internet usage in India. Companies like Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. introduced data tariffs that ranked among the most affordable in the world.


“He stands out as one of the brightest entrepreneurs in the country — yet is a teacher at heart,” Pai said in a 2017 interview with Bloomberg.


Among Byju’s early backers was Sequoia Capital, which came aboard in 2015 and invested 4.8 billion rupees ($58 million), according to data from Tracxn. Soon after, Lightspeed Venture Partners and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative — the Facebook founder’s philanthropic organization — participated in a $50 million funding round.


As capital flowed through the firm’s accounts, Raveendran acquired more than a dozen educational companies in India and abroad. When the pandemic pushed students online, the buyouts seemed prescient. Raveendran planned to take the company public through a SPAC merger. Some investors offered valuations as high as $48 billion, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg.


Raveendran also tapped debt markets to fuel his acquisition spree. Though Byju’s sought to borrow only $500 million in 2021, overseas investors — including Blackstone Inc., Fidelity and GIC — put up enough cash to double the target size of the firm’s term loan B to $1.2 billion.


Cracks in the Edifice

 


But by the middle of 2022, problems began to compound. The SPAC boom petered out, along with demand for online tutoring. Employees questioned Raveendran’s business instincts: Even as the lifting of Covid restrictions battered ed-tech, he sought to raise more equity — rather than conserve cash and target profitability.


That strategy hit a snag last July. Two key investors, Sumeru Ventures and Oxshott, failed to transfer about $250 million — part of the announced $800 million round — because of “macroeconomic reasons.” People familiar with the deal said Raveendran didn’t verify whether the investors had enough money before announcing the deal. (The funds never came through.)


Raveendran has avoided consulting investment bankers on deals, instead depending on Anita Kishore, his chief strategy officer, to execute most transactions, according to Byju’s employees.


Kishore and Raveendran declined to comment. 


Meanwhile, Indian officials sent queries to Byju’s about why the firm couldn’t close its financial accounts for the fiscal year ending March 2021. India’s enforcement directorate, which investigates money laundering and forex violations, sent summons to company officials, people familiar with the matter said.


Charges weren’t filed against Byju’s after the raid in late April. But the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India’s company regulator, will soon decide whether to open a formal probe, Bloomberg reported this month. 


The MCA and enforcement directorate didn’t reply to requests for comment.


Eighteen months after the financial year’s close, Byju’s finally released audited statements. They showed losses of 45.7 billion rupees — a 13-fold jump from the previous year. Byju’s blamed the performance on accounting practices that deferred revenue to subsequent years. Others pointed out a massive increase in marketing spending.


The firm’s finances alarmed investors. Some creditors, including Blackstone, offloaded their holdings, giving distressed investors in the US a chance to pick up the $1.2 billion loan at rates as low as 64 cents to a dollar.


Soon after buying the debt, those creditors began demanding accelerated payments as the firm had breached terms, including a September deadline for filing its results for the year ending March 31, 2022. 


Following eight months of negotiations, Byju’s lenders in the US accused the firm in a Delaware lawsuit of hiding $500 million. They argued that Byju’s is in technical default over the $1.2 billion loan because the firm hasn’t provided regular financial updates.

chart

 


In June, Byju’s skipped a $40 million interest payment and filed its own lawsuit in New York, accusing the lenders of “bad-faith negotiating.” The company has argued the debt contract prohibits lenders from selling their stakes to certain investors, including those who specialize in distressed debt.


Shareholder Revolt

 


The stakes continue to rise. Representatives from three big investors — Peak XV, Prosus and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative — recently quit Byju’s board. Deloitte Haskins & Sells also resigned as Byju’s auditor, citing the firm’s spotty financial records.


“Byju’s grew considerably since our first investment in 2018, but, over time, its reporting and governance structures did not evolve sufficiently for a company of that scale,” Prosus said in a July 25 statement, explaining why its director stepped down from Byju’s board.


In recent weeks, Raveendran and Ajay Goel — who joined Byju’s in April as its chief financial officer — hired an affiliate of accounting firm BDO to take over auditing. Goel has said that long-delayed financial accounts will be finalized by the end of September. 


“The best of Byju’s is yet to come,” Raveendran told employees at a recent town hall, where he pushed back on criticisms. The company has “not come this far to only come this far.”


Raveendran is counting on a $1 billion equity investment from backers in the Middle East, which is expected as early as next month. He is also tapping some of his early backers in India to tide over the cash crunch.


If the funds come through, Byju’s could pay down creditors and buy out the revolting US-based investors, according to people following the negotiations, who didn’t want to be named because the discussions are private. 


Meanwhile, earlier this week, lenders agreed to work toward restructuring the $1.2 billion loan by Aug. 3.


Most investors have slashed the firm’s valuation to less than $10 billion. But despite Byju’s rocky few months, many remain bullish, pointing to the firm’s strong assets, including 150 million customers.


“The company can still be brought back from the brink,” InCred’s Mathew said. “Some of its businesses have good cash flows, which can potentially attract value investors, who will come in with big cheques helping to sort out things.”


© 2023 Bloomberg L.P.



Source link

Elon Musk pursues financial services in wake of rivals’ failed attempts

Elon Musk pursues financial services in wake of rivals’ failed attempts



By Aisha S Gani and Jenny Surane


Billionaire Elon Musk’s grand vision is to turn Twitter into a one-stop shop for financial services. It’s hardly the first time a tech giant has sought to muscle in on Jamie Dimon’s turf.

 


The landscape is filled with technology firms that aimed to do the same thing: Facebook spent years investing in a project called Libra that was supposed to revolutionize cross-border payments, but regulatory scrutiny forced it to abandon the project. Google planned a digital financial offering and even lined up 11 banks as partners for the launch before it suddenly nixed the entire plan. And Amazon.com Inc. considered offering checking accounts for consumers, but that project never became a reality. 


US tech companies have struggled in their attempts to take on banking behemoths, often scaling back their ambitions in the face of competition and protracted approval processes. But Musk isn’t like other tech executives: his business decisions don’t tend to follow predictable paths — as evidenced by his many shocking moves at Twitter, including abandoning its iconic bird-based brand for the letter X — and he does have experience in financial technology, having founded the firm now known as PayPal Holdings Inc.


“I’m not saying at all that he can’t do it,” Pranav Sood, executive general manager at cross-border payments platform Airwallex. “But it’s something that takes time and it’s something that takes investment because you have to make sure that you do things right in order to stay compliant globally.”


Musk’s envisioned X app — which will connect Twitter’s underlying infrastructure with X.com, a web address that now functions as a routing service to Twitter — is one that layers communication, multimedia and “the ability to conduct your entire financial world.”


In messages posted in support of Musk’s overhaul, Twitter Chief Executive Officer Linda Yaccarino said X would include fintech features such as payments and banking. Twitter has already snagged money-transmitter licenses in four US states — Arizona, Michigan, Missouri and New Hampshire.


X is the future state of unlimited interactivity – centered in audio, video, messaging, payments/banking – creating a global marketplace for ideas, goods, services, and opportunities. Powered by AI, X will connect us all in ways we’re just beginning to imagine.


— Linda Yaccarino (@lindayacc) July 23, 2023

 


It was a vision Musk had tweeted himself in 2022 during his acquisition of the social-media site. His musings indicated he wanted Twitter to be more like Tencent Holdings Ltd.’s WeChat, a messaging service turned super-app used daily by more than a billion people in China. It’s also a fintech titan that allows users to send each other funds, pay for goods and services, and even borrow money. 


Buying Twitter is an accelerant to creating X, the everything app




— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 4, 2022

 


It wouldn’t be Musk’s first foray into payments. He moved to Silicon Valley during the dot-com boom, and founded a company — also once known as X.com — that eventually became PayPal. He made his first fortune when PayPal was sold to eBay Inc. As for banking, Musk has said he turned down “several high-paid jobs on Wall Street” to focus on technology — a decision that’s worked out well for Musk, now the world’s richest person, with a net worth of $238.9 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. 


But baking in banking and payments features will require users to get comfortable with a company with a brand-new product name and its own set of financial woes after Musk saddled Twitter with high-cost debt.


WeChat, Alipay

 


Tech platforms around the world are looking for ways to better monetize their existing customer bases and product offerings, and have long sought the routine, loyal engagement consumers have with their banks and other financial-services providers. Plus, they’d love to replicate the traction that players such as WeChat and Ant Group Co.’s Alipay have gained in China.


In recent years, US tech companies have invested in beefing up their payments and financial-services capabilities. In some cases, though, their progress has been stunted by push-back from lawmakers and regulators.


Meta Platforms Inc.’s Facebook debuted the Libra Association in 2019. The idea was that the company and its partners could use stablecoins to make it cheaper and easier to offer remittances to consumers. Almost immediately, politicians and regulators around the world called on Facebook to halt the project and key partners including Mastercard Inc. and Visa Inc. abandoned the association within months.


Alphabet Inc.’s Google has tried — and struggled — to become a primary medium of commerce in the US, despite relative overseas success in countries such as India. Last year, the company shelved plans to add bank accounts to its payment app after it had tied up partners including Citigroup Inc. for months on the work.


And Amazon held early talks in 2018 with banks such as Dimon’s JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Capital One Financial Corp. to offer checking accounts, but that never resulted in any products.


Ambitions Abandoned


Even Musk’s former company has sought to become a WeChat-style super-app. Two years ago, when PayPal was was worth more than Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. combined, the company plotted an ambitious foray into new areas including stock trading and high-yield savings accounts as the firm sought to go beyond its roots as an iconic checkout button.


But, more recently, after the company’s stock was battered amid a slowdown in spending on the firm’s payments platforms, PayPal has had to abandon those ambitions. These days, Chief Executive Officer Dan Schulman is once again focused on improving the checkout button rather than turning PayPal into a one-stop shop for its customers’ financial needs.


“Our first and most important priority is continually to improve the branded checkout experience,” Schulman told investors in May. “This is at the core of what we do.”


The transition to offering financial services isn’t a straightforward one, given tough competition in the US banking market, intense regulatory scrutiny and a high level of “stickiness” among finance customers, said Jeff Tijssen, global head of fintech at consulting firm Bain & Co.


“You will therefore need to think of a very compelling value proposition that is truly differentiating in order to stand out,” he said.


© 2023 Bloomberg L.P.



Source link

Amazed to see fast pace digital change in India: Samsung SW Asia CEO

Amazed to see fast pace digital change in India: Samsung SW Asia CEO



India has changed digitally at a fast pace with the use of smartphones, and businesses will expand in the country in the coming years, a senior Samsung official said here.


Samsung SouthWest Asia President and CEO JB Park said Digital India kind of projects were adopted in Korea in the past that brought growth and development in the country.


India has a vast population under an average of 30 years, which will push for growth in demand and business, he added.


“You have to think about the expanding population in India, and the proportion of people who are young, say below 30 years. You have to look at the penetration of each category, such as smartphones and refrigerators. If you look at India, in the next 20 years, the demand will not be soft, and businesses will expand,” Park, who oversees India business, said.


Samsung, at present, leads the India market in several technology verticals.


Samsung led the Indian smartphone market with a 20 per cent share in the January-March 2023 quarter and also remained the leading brand for 5G shipments, accounting for a 24 per cent share, according to a report.


Market analysis firm Techarc said Samsung has become the de facto choice of consumers wanting to buy Android beyond Rs 1 lakh in India.


Park said that he is amazed to see the rapid digital growth in India and the fast flow of information among generations using the internet.


“I set foot in India for the first time some 13 years ago and since then, I have seen so many changes. I am amazed at how fast India has changed digitally through smartphones,” he said.


Park said that Korea has built everything from scratch after the Korean War in the early 1950s.


The common thing that is pushing development in India and Korea is “desperation” among parents to educate their children, he noted.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp