Crude oil futures fall 1% to ₹9,417 as UAE exits OPEC

Crude oil futures fall 1% to ₹9,417 as UAE exits OPEC


The UAE’s departure from the oil cartel is expected to have a limited immediate impact, say analysts
| Photo Credit:
William_Potter

Crude oil prices fell nearly 1 per cent to ₹9,417 per barrel in futures trade on Wednesday, tracking losses in global benchmarks after the United Arab Emirates announced that it will exit the oil cartel OPEC producer group.

Analysts said persistent uncertainty over the US-Iran conflict and continued disruption in the Strait of Hormuz capped losses in oil prices.

On the Multi Commodity Exchange, crude oil for May delivery fell ₹68, or 0.72 per cent, to ₹9,417 per barrel.

Traders attributed the decline to weak global trends following the UAE’s announcement that it will leave the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its wider OPEC+ alliance effective on May 1.

The UAE had been a longtime member of OPEC, first through Abu Dhabi in 1967 and later after the country was formed in 1971.

In the international markets, Brent crude for the June contract decreased 0.34 per cent to $104.04 per barrel, and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fell 0.68 per cent to $99.25 per barrel in New York.

Analysts at ING THINK said the departure of the UAE from the oil cartel is expected to have a limited immediate impact. However, it may raise supply prospects over the medium-to-longer term.

“Had this been announced at any other time, we would likely have seen more downward pressure on oil prices,” they said.

They added that near-term price direction will continue to be driven by developments in the Persian Gulf and the timing of a resumption in oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz.

With no signs of an imminent resumption in oil flows, ING revised its oil price forecasts for the rest of the year. “We now expect Brent Crude to average $104 per barrel in the second quarter and $92 a barrel in the fourth quarter,” it added.

Published on April 29, 2026



Source link

Stock Market Today Live: Sensex rises 670 pts to 77,557.53; Nifty 50 up 210 pts to 24,210.60; Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra & Mahindra are top gainers

Stock Market Today Live: Sensex rises 670 pts to 77,557.53; Nifty 50 up 210 pts to 24,210.60; Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra & Mahindra are top gainers


Morgan Stanley on Maruti Suzuki (Tactical buy)

Maintain Overweight; target price ₹17,895 

Positive tactical view (next 30 days); expects near-term outperformance 

Stock corrected ~20% in 6 months vs Nifty down ~8% 

Correction driven by margin concerns and West Asia demand worries 

FY27 domestic volume growth guided at ~10%, ~200 bps ahead of estimates 

Margins likely to bottom out in Q1FY27, followed by recovery 

Operating leverage, lower discounts and richer mix to support margins 

Valuation below long-term averages 

70–80% probability assigned to positive scenario

Goldman Sachs on Maruti Suzuki

Maintain Buy, Target price ₹15,800 

Q4 broadly in line with expectations 

Domestic volume growth guidance at 10% for FY27 

Channel inventory lean at ~12 days 

Capacity addition of 500k units planned in FY27 

Price hike optionality remains key monitorable 

Exports outlook balanced despite Middle East logistics issues 

Potential price hikes could materially aid EPS growth 

Demand momentum remains healthy despite geopolitical concerns 

High-demand models continue facing supply constraints

Motilal Oswal on Maruti Suzuki

Maintain Buy with a target price of ₹15,529 (vs ₹15,392) 

Demand outlook remains upbeat 

Healthy demand to offset cost headwinds, with minimal margin pressure 

GST rate cuts aiding small car demand, improving affordability 

~10% domestic volume growth expected in FY27, supported by strong order backlog and launches 

Expect ~16% earnings CAGR over FY26–28

HSBC on Maruti

Buy, TP Rs 15000

MSIl reported an in-line 4Q and has managed commodity inflation well so far

Volume growth guidance of 10% was positive and underscores the resilient demand environment

Valuations at 20x FY28e EPS look undemanding; MSIL is also a key beneficiary of 8th Pay commission

Jefferies on Maruti

Hold, TP Rs 13800

MSIL’s Mar-Q EBIT grew 30% YoY (inline with JEFe), but PAT fell 3% YoY (15% miss) on lower financial income.

PV demand is holding up well and MSIL expects its domestic volumes to grow 10% in FY27 (JEFe: 7%).

MSIL’s market share, however, has slipped to a 13-year low amid demand shift towards SUVs, which is a concern.

Post recent fall, stock is at 24x FY27E PE vs last 10-yr average of 26x

Cut FY27-28E EPS by 9%;

UBS on Maruti

Neutral, TP cut to Rs 13970

Revenue surge fails to lift margins

Q4FY26: RM impact partially neutralised by lower discounts and other exp.

1) Management expects its domestic volumes to grow at 10% for FY27;

2) First time buyer ratio is currently at 51% (v/s. 42% in 1HFY26);

3) After having 30%+ export growth in FY26, the outlook remains contingent on end-market demand now given the ongoing conflict;

4) Full year FY27 capex guidance upped at Rs14bn in light of the capacity expansion plans;

5) The dealer inventory levels are currently ~12 days;

6) The company is on track to launch 7 SUVs by FY30, though launch timelines may be lumpy.

CLSA on Eternal

High Conviction O-P, TP Rs 505

Blinkit’s NOV rose 95% YoY, in line with est.

Contribution margin was flat QoQ despite 4% lower AOV, largely seasonal.

Orders grew 93.3% YoY, 4% ahead of estimate with lower CAC leading to 98.5% MTU growth

Confidence on Blinkit’s business model is strengthened due to robust growth/profitability despite heightened competitive intensity.

Acceleration in food delivery NOV continued as Zomato continues to expand MTUs by improving affordability

Jefferies on Eternal

Buy, TP cut to Rs 400

Despite high competitive intensity, Eternal reported further improvement in Q/C profitability, which is commendable

Growth was modest, partly reflecting seasonality, but mgmt has guided for c60% CAGR over 3Y, retaining 5-6% EBITDA margin.

Food delivery saw no impact from gas shortages and delivered a strong NOV, with an equally positive outlook.

Notably, management has also guided for US$1bn consol EBITDA by FY29E and views AI as an enabler

GS on Eternal

Buy, TP Rs 340

Q4 indicate Blinkit’s underlying NOV growth is closer to mid-teens qoq, rather than high-single digits, and quick commerce margins can expand despite elevated competition.

Additionally, food delivery growth continues to accelerate; see these as positive near-term drivers of stock price

Expect Blinkit’s June ‘27 NOV growth to accelerate to 15% qoq (80% YoY), driven by better AOV, higher number of days, & positive impact from summer quarter; forecast EBITDA margin to further improve to +0.6% of NOV.

In food delivery, expect 19% YoY NOV growth in 1QFY27, with 20 bps qoq EBITDA margin expansion due to recent increase in platform fee.

HSBC on Eternal

Buy, TP Rs 300

4Q was a tad below expectations, though medium-term growth guidance was significantly positive vs estimates

Blinkit seems unperturbed by near-term competition & expects meaningful pick-up in growth in QC in 1QFY27

See long-term value in Eternal (USD1.1bn EBITDA in FY30), though near-term volatility may persist

Macquarie on Eternal

U-P, TP Rs 200

Sequential growth moderation; optimistic guide

Zomato – Food Delivery. NOVg at 19% Y-o-Y and adj EBITDA margin at 5.5% was in-line with VA consensus

District – Going Out. 6% Q-o-Q NOV growth and -3% adj EBITDA margin.

Guidance of US$150mn adj EBITDA by FY30 maintained.

Incred on Eternal

ADD, TP Rs 383

Aiming at 20% yoy & 60% CAGR in FD and QC businesses. 

Expects to reach adjusted EBITDA of US$1bn by FY29F

Rternal’s leadership in its segments and control over unit economics supports our view

Rising competitive intensity is a key downside risk to our estimates and valuation

DAM Cap on Eternal

Buy, TP Rs 330

In-line operations; strong QC growth guidance

built in 44% CAGR (NOV) growth over FY26-29E

This will be led by 18% CAGR in FD and 59% CAGR in QC business.

Blinkit has already become Adj EBITDA profitable.

Going forward should observe exponential growth in profitability till the time business reaches to a stable EBITDA margin of 4-5%.

Competitive intensity remains a key risk

Food margins should remain range bound; value Blinkit on EV/EBITDA on FY28 at 70x, while FD business is valued at 30x

CLSA on Bandhan BK

O-P, TP raised to Rs 220

2nd good quarter for Bandhan Bank after several tough quarters since mid-2024.

4QFY26 PAT was 26% above estimate, driven by stronger fees and lower credit costs, partly offset by higher opex

Bank hit a 1% ROA after six quarters.

AUM growth picked up to 13% YoY, aided by a pickup in MFI growth.

Reported NIM improved 30bp QoQ to 6.2%, driven largely by term deposit repricing.

But, most importantly, asset quality improved meaningfully

Net slippage ratio improved 100bp QoQ to 1.9% and was half of the 2QFY26 level; this drove the sharp credit cost beat

Going ahead, management targets 14-15% loan growth with a largely stable loan mix.

It also expects another 10-20bp NIM improvement and a pickup in fees.

Jefferies on Bandhan Bk

Buy, TP Rs 215

For Mar-Qtr, Bandhan Bank’s profit of Rs5bn (up 68% YoY) beat estimates with lower credit costs & higher fees.

Stability in MFI sector & trends in election-bound states are supporting credit quality.

This, along with scope for expansion in NIM should aid turnaround in earnings over FY27-28

Tweak est. to factor 4Q results & are tad conservative vs mtg guidance given volatility in this sector

UBS on Bandhan BK

Neutral, TP raised to Rs 200

Q4 PAT beat: Strong beat on credit costs; partly offset by higher Opex

MFI book grows at c7.5% QoQ; CASA ratio up c200bp

Management aim for a FY27 exit ROA of 1.6% – 1.8%

Believe stock’s current valuation prices in a large part of asset quality improvement & see limited upside from current levels (c1x FY27E P/BV, stock up 24% YTD)

Macquarie on Bandhan BK

U-P, TP Rs 130

PAT beats estimates driven by lower credit costs

Slippages moderate, loan growth picks up pace

Lower borrowing costs support NIM expansion

Management guidance remains ambitious, targeting 14– 15% loan growth & 1.6–1.8% RoA by 4QFY27, supported by 10–20bps NIM expansion (from deposit repricing), fee income traction & lower PSLC costs.

4Q stood out for Bandhan in an otherwise weak year, but believe consistent performance is needed for a possible re-rating

JPM on Bandhan BK

Neutral, TP raised to Rs 157

4QFY26: Core performance misses, AQ improvement supporting RoA expansion, sustainability key

While Bandhan’s strategic pivot is underway, & guidance for 1.6-1.7% of RoA by FY27 exit (vs 1.1% in 4QFY26, reported) is positive, trend has been very volatile historically

Await more visibility on sustainability of ongoing recovery, especially in light of ongoing macroeconomic headwinds.

Current valuations at 1.03x FY27 P/BV appear fair & cap any significant upside

Raise forecasts for FY27/28E by 17%/2% resp.

Elara Capital on Bandhan Bank

Maintain Buy, Target price ₹220 (vs ₹186 earlier) 

Strong Q4 with PAT up over 65% YoY 

NII growth at 4% QoQ supported by better NIMs 

Controlled slippages with improvement in MFI portfolio 

SMA-0 improved though SMA-1 and SMA-2 remain monitorables 

Loan growth improving with secured mix at ~56% 

NIM up 10 bps QoQ to 6.12% 

Industry MFI trends indicate possible inflection point 

Better predictability driving rerating potential 

Elections in key states remain monitorable for collections

HSBC on Dalmia Bharat

Buy, TP Rs 2490

Better cost control drives profit beat in 4Q despite lower volumes; April price hikes cover 1Q cost inflation of INR125-150/t

Management’s focus on profitable growth, higher utilization and RoCE improvement is a positive

Valuation (11.6x EV/EBITDA) & regional exposure (South, East) are key positives

CLSA on Dalmia Bharat

O-P, TP Rs 2240

Delivered a mixed quarter, with Ebitda of Rs9bn (+14% YoY) marginally ahead of consensus but in line with estimate, aided by lower costs.

However, volume grew just 4%, lagging industry growth of 6%–7%.

Management reiterated confidence in outgrowing the industry over FY27–28, driven by a demand recovery and operational normalisation.

April price hikes should partly offset near-term cost inflation, though rising petcoke, packaging and logistics costs (Rs125–150/t impact) could weigh margins

Morgan Stanley on Dalmia Bharat

Maintain Underweight, Target price ₹2,015 

EBITDA/t beat estimates at ₹1,025/t 

Volumes weaker than expected due to asset breakdown 

West Asia crisis could drive ₹125–150/t cost inflation in Q1FY27 

Power and fuel costs better than estimates 

PAT broadly in line with expectations 

Net debt/EBITDA improved to 0.46x 

75mnt capacity target for FY28 reiterated 

Roadmap to capacity expansion yet to be disclosed 

Overhangs remain despite operational beat

Goldman Sachs on Dalmia Bharat

Maintain Neutral, Target price ₹2,090 (vs ₹2,120 earlier) 

Q4 volumes impacted by kiln shutdown in Odisha 

Volume growth would have been ~6% YoY adjusted for outage 

EBITDA/t improved to ₹1,025/t 

Cost control and better realizations aided profitability 

Pricing improved in key regions during April 

Management expects ₹120–150/t cost inflation in Q1FY27 

Competition intensity rising in South and East India 

Near-term growth may outperform industry on favorable base

Bernstein on Sapphire Foods

Maintain Neutral; target price ₹240 

Q4FY26 revenue grew ~11% YoY to ₹7.9bn; FY26 revenue at ₹31bn 

Store additions strong, with 24 in Q4 and 89 in FY26 

EBITDA margin at ~7.7%; adjusted PBT margin improved to ~1.1% 

KFC India growth strong (~15% YoY); SSSG improved to ~4% 

Pizza Hut India weak, with SSSG at –7% and negative margins 

Sri Lanka business saw healthy SSSG, though margins impacted by fuel costs 

Merger-related decisions remain key, with limited near-term triggers

Goldman Sachs on Sapphire Foods

Not Rated 

KFC SSSG at +4% YoY, ahead of estimates 

Adjusted for Navratri shift, SSSG at +6% YoY 

Demand momentum sustained into April 

Value initiatives driving traffic growth across regions 

KFC EBITDA growth at 23% YoY 

Price hikes of ~1.5–2% taken in March/April 

Pizza Hut trends still weak but better than estimates 

Sri Lanka business continues strong double-digit growth 

FY27/FY28 sales estimates raised driven by KFC recovery

Elara Capital on Jindal Saw

Downgrade to Accumulate from BUY 

Target price ₹280 (unchanged) 

Q4 impacted by MENA export disruptions and logistics issues 

Standalone volumes down 11% YoY 

Order book remains healthy at ~1.9mn tonnes 

Provides ~17 months revenue visibility 

Middle East expansion projects progressing on schedule 

Near-term earnings impacted by logistical constraints 

YoY earnings growth expected from Q2FY27 onwards 

Strong medium-term outlook supported by capex revival 

Stock up ~17% since initiation leading to downgrade

Morgan Stanley on Go Digit General Insurance

Maintain Equal-weight, Target price ₹328 

IndAS profit growth strong despite softer IGAAP print 

IGAAP PBT missed estimates as combined ratio worsened 

Underlying IndAS profit growth at 69% YoY 

Economic combined ratio rose to 111.7% 

Motor competition showing early signs of easing 

GWP growth at 6% YoY lagged industry growth 

Management maintaining profit-focused approach 

Valuations seen as full despite improving ROE trajectory 

Awaiting better entry point

Morgan Stanley on Leela Palaces Hotels & Resorts

Maintain Overweight, Target price ₹579 

RevPAR grew 6% YoY in Q4 

ARR growth at 15% offset by lower occupancy 

Middle East conflict impacted international travel demand 

Domestic business remained resilient 

April trends improving with better ARR trajectory 

Management expects double-digit revenue and EBITDA growth in Q1FY27 

Growth supported by owned portfolio and new properties 

Balance sheet remains strong with net debt/EBITDA at 1.6x 

Dubai refurbishment timelines unchanged despite conflict

Morgan Stanley on Ashok Leyland (Tactical sell)

Maintain Equal-weight; target price ₹180 

Negative tactical view (next 30 days); expects near-term underperformance 

Stock up ~20% in 6 months vs Nifty down ~8%, indicating recent rerating 

CV volume growth healthy in 1HFY27, but expected to taper from 2HFY27 

Rising commodity costs likely to pressure margins 

Valuation less compelling at ~13x FY27 EV/EBITDA (ex-HLF) 

70–80% probability assigned to negative scenario

Morgan Stanley on REC

Maintain Overweight, Target price ₹455 

Weak quarter with PAT down 21% YoY 

PAT missed estimates by 17–22% 

Higher provisioning and weaker PPOP impacted earnings 

NIM at 3.55%, below estimates 

AUM growth muted at 3% YoY 

Disbursements down 9% QoQ 

Higher Stage 1 coverage drove elevated provisioning 

Asset quality underlying trends remain healthy 

Valuation attractive at ~6x FY27 P/E and ~1x P/BV

Jefferies on Emmvee Photo

Buy, TP Rs 350

Emmvee reported a beat with Ebitda/PAT 13%/17% ahead of JEFe.

Order book was flat q/q with strong visibility of revenue/Ebitda over FY27-1HFY28.

Though working capital expanded, balance sheet is net-debt free as co begins expansion capex

Raised FY27E Ebitda 4% and project 26% Ebitda Cagr over FY26-28E.

Power demand recovery in FY27 should aid renewables

Find valuation attractive at 35% discount to peers.

Nomura on Indus Tower

Initiate Buy, TP Rs 490

Structural data growth; Vi’s positive outlook key

Vi’s stabilization unlocks tenancy growth; valuation gap vs global peers to narrow

Dividend resumption could be a key re-rating trigger

Est. a total dividend payout of Rs19/sh by Indus in FY26F, implying a dividend yield of 4.7% at CMP

Jefferies India Strategy

Following substantial equity selling of $56 billion in CY24–25 amid elevated valuations 

Promoter buying of $4 billion+ in CY26 TD represents a noteworthy shift 

While still selective, these actions appear to coincide with valuation normalisation 

Buying is generally concentrated in asset-heavy sectors, viz. power, infrastructure, and property 

Key companies include Adani Enterprises, GMR, JSW Energy, Godrej Properties, AESL, Lodha, Grasim, Jindal Stainless, Maruti, and Indus Towers



Source link

इकोनॉमी की रफ्तार पर ‘ब्रेक’, मार्च में 5 महीने के निचले स्तर पर आई औद्योगिक ग्रोथ

इकोनॉमी की रफ्तार पर ‘ब्रेक’, मार्च में 5 महीने के निचले स्तर पर आई औद्योगिक ग्रोथ


India Industrial Growth: ईरान में जंग और पश्चिम एशिया में तनाव के बीच भारत का इंडस्ट्रियल प्रोडक्शन ग्रोथ या औद्योगिक उत्पादन की वृद्धि दर मार्च में घटकर पांच महीने के निचले स्तर 4.1% पर आ गई है. एक साल पहले यह ग्रोथ रेट  3.9% थी, जबकि फरवरी 2026 में यह 5.1 परसेंट थी.

सांख्यिकी मंत्रालय द्वारा 28 अप्रैल को जारी डेटा के मुताबिक, यह गिरावट मुख्य रूप से विनिर्माण (Manufacturing) और बिजली (Electricity) उत्पादन के क्षेत्र में सुस्ती के चलते आई है.

सेक्टरवार कैसा रहा परफॉर्मेंस?

मैन्युफैक्चरिंग- देश के मैन्युफैक्चरिंग सेक्टर का ग्रोथ रेट फरवरी के 5.9 परसेंट से गिरकर मार्च में 4.3 परसेंट पर आ गई.

बिजली- मार्च के महीने में बिजली उत्पादन में भी गिरावट देखी गई, जो फरवरी में 2.3 परसेंट से घटकर मार्च में सिर्फ 0.8 परसेंट पर आ गई. 

खनन- मार्च के दौरान इस क्षेत्र में सुधार हुआ और यह 5.5 परसेंट की दर से आगे बढ़ा. 

क्यों आई गिरावट?

एक्सपर्ट्स का कहना है कि पश्चिम एशिया में जारी संकट के चलते ऊर्जा की कीमतों में हुई बढ़ोतरी और इससे इनपुट कॉस्ट में हुए इजाफे का असर औद्योगिक उत्पादन पर पड़ा है.

टाइम्स ऑफ इंडिया की रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक, Crisil में प्रिंसिपल इकोनॉमिस्ट दीप्ति देशपांडे ने कहा, मार्च के आंकड़े पश्चिम एशियाई संघर्ष के कारण लगे झटके के केवल एक हिस्से को ही दर्शाते हैं क्योंकि अनिश्चितता और उत्पादकों के कमजोर मनोबल का असर उत्पादन आंकड़ों में अभी पूरी तरह से सामने आना बाकी है.

CareEdge की चीफ इकोनॉमिस्ट रजनी सिन्हा का भी कुछ ऐसा ही कहना है. वह कहती हैं कि वैश्विक स्तर पर बने हुए जोखिम और सप्लाई चेन में रुकावटों से जुड़ी चिंताओं के कारण भारत की कुल औद्योगिक गतिविधियों को मुश्किलों का सामना करना पड़ सकता है.

ये भी पढ़ें:

सावधान! कितनी तेजी से बढ़ रहा है आपका कारोबार? GST से मासिक आउटपुट ट्रैक करेगी सरकार 



Source link

सोना हुआ सस्ता, चांदी की भी फीकी पड़ी चमक; जानें आपके शहर में कितना है लेटेस्ट रेट

सोना हुआ सस्ता, चांदी की भी फीकी पड़ी चमक; जानें आपके शहर में कितना है लेटेस्ट रेट


Gold Silver Price Today Live: आज देश में सोने-चांदी की कीमतों में गिरावट देखी जा रही है. ग्लोबल मार्केट में सुस्ती और स्थानीय मांग में कमी के बीच सोने की कीमत में आज 1,300 रुपये और चांदी में करीब 6,500 रुपये तक की गिरावट आई है. राष्ट्रीय राजधानी दिल्ली में आज 24 कैरेट सोने की कीमत प्रति 10 ग्राम 1,51,070 रुपये और 22 कैरेट सोने की कीमत 1,38,490 रुपये प्रति 10 ग्रामउ

आज सोने की कीमत

शहर  22 कैरेट सोने की कीमत  24 कैरेट सोने की कीमत 
दिल्ली 1,38,490 रुपये  1,51,070 रुपये
मुंबई 1,38,340 रुपये 1,50,920 रुपये
कोलकाता 1,38,340 रुपये 1,50,920 रुपये
चेन्नई 1,39,140 रुपये 1,51,790 रुपये
बेंगलुरु 1,38,340 रुपये 1,50,920 रुपये
हैदराबाद  1,38,340 रुपये 1,50,920 रुपये
पुणे  1,38,340 रुपये 1,50,920 रुपये
अहमदाबाद  1,38,390 रुपये 1,50,970 रुपये
लखनऊ 1,38,490 रुपये 1,51,070 रुपये

 बता दें कि इन कीमतों में 3 परसेंट जीएसटी, मेकिंग चार्ज और अन्य स्थानीय टैक्स शामिल नहीं है. फाइनल रेट के लिए आपको अपने नजदीकी किसी ज्वेलरी की दुकान पर संपर्क करना होगा. 

चांदी की कीमत

आज चांदी की भी कीमत में गिरावट देखी जा रही है. बुधवार को चांदी प्रति किलोग्राम 2,43,284 रुपये-2,60,000 रुपये के बीच कारोबार कर रही है. इसमें कल के मुकाबले लगभग 6,500 रुपये की गिरावट देखी जा रही है. 

क्यों आई गिरावट?

  • अंतर्राष्ट्रीय बाजारों में Spot Gold के दाम गिरे हैं, जिसका भारत के सर्राफा बाजार में सोने की कीमत पर असर पड़ा है.
  • आज डॉलर इंडेक्स में दूसरी करेंसीज के मुकाबले आई मजबूती की वजह से अन्य मुद्राओं में सोना खरीदना महंगा हुआ है, जिससे इसकी मांग कम हुई है और कीमतें घटी हैं.
  • आज भारतीय शेयर बाजार में तेजी देखी जा रही है. शेयर बाजार जब भी अच्छा परफॉर्म करता है, तब निवेशक सोने जैसी सुरक्षित संपत्तियों से पैसा निकालकर स्टॉक्स में लगाते हैं. 
  • ग्राहकों ने भी इस बीच शादियों के सीजन के दौरान ऊंची कीमत की चलते खरीदारी कम की है, जिससे हाजिर बाजार पर दबाव बढ़ा है.

ये भी पढ़ें: Hormuz Crisis: अब कोल्ड ड्रिंक्स की बारी! गर्मी के बीच मार्किट से गायब हुई कैन, क्या है कारण? 



Source link

UAE ने 59 साल बाद OPEC छोड़ा! क्या बिखरेगा तेल का कोटा तय करने वाला ग्रुप, भारत को फायदा कैसे?

UAE ने 59 साल बाद OPEC छोड़ा! क्या बिखरेगा तेल का कोटा तय करने वाला ग्रुप, भारत को फायदा कैसे?


यूनाइटेड अरब अमीरात (UAE) ने मंगलवार (28 अप्रैल) को कच्चे तेल का उत्पादन और निर्यात करने वाले देशों के ऑर्गेनाइजेशन OPEC और OPEC+ से अलग होने का ऐलान कर दिया है. यह फैसला ऐसे समय में आया है जब ईरान के साथ जारी युद्ध की वजह से दुनिया भर में एनर्जी यानी ऊर्जा संकट गहराया हुआ है. लंबे समय से OPEC का हिस्सा रहे UAE के इस कदम से सऊदी अरब की लीडरशिप वाले इस ग्रुप की एकता पर बड़ा असर पड़ सकता है. अब सवाल है कि इससे OPEC पर क्या असर पड़ेगा, क्या वह बिखर जाएगा और भारत को कैसे फायदा मिलेगा? जानेंगे एक्सप्लेनर में…

सवाल 1: OPEC क्या है और इसका काम क्या है?
जवाब: OPEC का पूरा नाम ऑर्गनाइजेशन ऑफ द पेट्रोलियम एक्सपोर्टिंग कंट्रीज है. यह 14 सितंबर 1960 को बगदाद में स्थापित किया गया था. इसके शुरुआती पांच संस्थापक सदस्य थे, ईरान, इराक, कुवैत, सऊदी अरब और वेनेजुएला. UAE ने 1967 में OPEC जॉइन किया था.

OPEC का मुख्य उद्देश्य अपने सदस्य देशों की पेट्रोलियम नीतियों को समन्वयित और एकीकृत करना है ताकि तेल उत्पादकों को बेहतर और स्थिर कीमतें मिलें, उपभोक्ता देशों को कुशल और नियमित तेल आपूर्ति हो और उद्योग में निवेश करने वालों को उचित रिटर्न मिले.

वर्तमान में OPEC के 12 सदस्य देश हैं, जिनमें 5 संस्थापक देश और UAE के अलावा अल्जीरिया, कांगो, नाइजीरिया, लीबिया, गैबॉन और भूमध्यरेखीय गिनी शामिल हैं. यह संगठन दुनिया के कुल तेल उत्पादन का करीब 30% कंट्रोल करता है. 2016 से OPEC+ बना, जिसमें रूस, कजाकिस्तान आदि गैर-OPEC देश भी शामिल हो गए, जिससे कुल उत्पादन दुनिया के लगभग 40-41% तक पहुंच गया. OPEC को अक्सर कार्टेल कहा जाता है क्योंकि यह तेल की कीमतें कंट्रोल करने के लिए उत्पादन कोटा तय करता है. जब कीमतें गिरती हैं तो उत्पादन कम करता है और जब जरूरत पड़ती है तो बढ़ाता है.

 

OPEC तेल उत्पादन का कोटा तय करता है

सवाल 2: UAE ने OPEC क्यों छोड़ा?
जवाब: 28 अप्रैल 2026 को संयुक्त अरब अमीरात (UAE) ने औपचारिक घोषणा की कि वह OPEC और OPEC+ दोनों को 1 मई 2026 से छोड़ रहा है. UAE ने कहा कि यह फैसला उसके ‘राष्ट्रीय हितों’ और ‘लंबी अवधि की रणनीतिक और आर्थिक विजन को ध्यान में रखकर लिया गया है. UAE अब अपनी घरेलू ऊर्जा उत्पादन क्षमता बढ़ाने और ग्लोबल एनर्जी मार्केट में ज्यादा स्वतंत्र भूमिका निभाने पर फोकस करना चाहता है.

यह फैसला ईरान युद्ध के बीच आया है, जिसमें स्ट्रेट ऑफ होर्मुज (दुनिया के करीब 20% तेल और LNG गुजरने वाला रास्ता) प्रभावित है. UAE के राष्ट्रपति के डिप्लोमैटिक एडवाइजर अनवर मोहम्मद गर्गश ने कहा कि ईरान के हमलों के दौरान अरब और खाड़ी देशों (GCC) का रुख काफी कमजोर रहा. उन्होंने लॉजिस्टिक मदद की बात जरूर की, लेकिन राजनीतिक और सैन्य स्तर पर समर्थन की कमी पर निराशा जताई. यह कदम सऊदी अरब की अगुवाई वाले OPEC के लिए बड़ा झटका है. UAE OPEC का एक महत्वपूर्ण और अनुशासित सदस्य था.

 

अनवर मोहम्मद गर्गश ने सैन्य मदद की कमी पर निराशा जताई
अनवर मोहम्मद गर्गश ने सैन्य मदद की कमी पर निराशा जताई

सवाल 3: क्या OPEC बिखर रहा है, अगर हां तो यह कितना बड़ा बिखराव है?
जवाब: UAE का जाना OPEC के लिए बड़ा झटका जरूर है, लेकिन अभी पूरा बिखराव नहीं कहा जा सकता. UAE OPEC का तीसरा या चौथा सबसे बड़ा उत्पादक था. इसके जाने से OPEC की उत्पादन क्षमता में करीब 15% की कमी आ सकती है.

पिछले सालों में भी कई सदस्य आए-गए हैं, जैसे इंडोनेशिया, कतर, इक्वाडोर, अंगोला आदि ने सदस्यता छोड़ी या निलंबित की. लेकिन UAE जैसे मजबूत और अनुपालन करने वाले सदस्य का जाना अलग मायने रखता है.

एक्सपर्ट्स का कहना है कि यह OPEC की एकता को कमजोर करता है और सऊदी अरब की नेतृत्व क्षमता पर सवाल उठाता है. अगर और UAE जैसे अन्य खाड़ी देश भी इसी रास्ते पर चले तो भविष्य में OPEC का प्रभाव और घट सकता है. अभी यह एक सदस्य का जाना है, लेकिन ईरान युद्ध और भू-राजनीतिक तनाव के बीच यह संगठन के लिए चिंताजनक संकेत है.

सवाल 4: इस बिखराव से किसका नुकसान होगा?
जवाब: इस बिखराव से 4 बड़े नुकसान होंगे:

  • OPEC और खासकर सऊदी अरब का नुकसान: उत्पादन कोटा तय करने और कीमतें कंट्रोल करने की ताकत कम होगी. सऊदी अरब को अकेले ज्यादा बोझ उठाना पड़ सकता है, जो OPEC का डी-फैक्टो लीडर है.
  • तेल निर्यातक देशों का: अगर OPEC कमजोर हुआ तो तेल की कीमतें ज्यादा उतार-चढ़ाव वाली हो सकती हैं, जिससे उनकी आय प्रभावित होगी.
  • दुनिया भर के तेल उपभोक्ताओंका फायदा-नुकसान: UAE अब कोटा से मुक्त होकर ज्यादा तेल उत्पादन कर सकता है, जिससे आपूर्ति बढ़ने और कीमतें गिरने की संभावना है. ईरान युद्ध के कारण फिलहाल ब्रेंट क्रूड 111 डॉलर प्रति बैरल के ऊपर है. UAE के बाहर निकलने से लंबे समय में कीमतें स्थिर या नीचे आ सकती हैं. भारत जैसे बड़े आयातक देशों (जो 80% से ज्यादा तेल आयात करते हैं) को राहत मिल सकती है.
  • ट्रंप प्रशासन के लिए: कई रिपोर्ट्स इसे अमेरिकी राष्ट्रपति डोनाल्ड ट्रंप की कूटनीतिक जीत बता रही हैं. ट्रंप लंबे समय से OPEC पर आरोप लगाते रहे हैं कि यह तेल की कीमतें जानबूझकर बढ़ाकर दुनिया को लूट रहा है. UAE का जाना OPEC को कमजोर करता है और अमेरिका की ऊर्जा बाजार में प्रभाव बढ़ा सकता है.

सवाल 5: तो फिर इस मामले में आगे क्या हो सकता है?
जवाब: UAE का जाना तत्काल तेल आपूर्ति पर असर नहीं डालेगा क्योंकि स्ट्रेट ऑफ होर्मुज अभी भी प्रभावित है, लेकिन लंबे समय में यह OPEC+ की एकता को चुनौती देगा. अगर कीमतें गिरती हैं तो सऊदी अरब और अन्य सदस्यों को बजट घाटा बढ़ सकता है.

एक्सपर्ट्स कह रहे हैं कि यह कदम UAE की अपनी ऊर्जा विविधीकरण और स्वतंत्र नीति की ओर बढ़ने का संकेत है. दुनिया के तेल बाजार में अनिश्चितता बढ़ गई है. एक तरफ ईरान युद्ध है, तो दूसरी तरफ OPEC जैसे संगठनों का कमजोर होना.



Source link

UAE exit blindsides OPEC and threatens to shake its grip on oil

UAE exit blindsides OPEC and threatens to shake its grip on oil


The shock decision by the United Arab Emirates to quit OPEC blindsided its partners of six decades. Now the cartel will have to fight to stay relevant in a fast-shifting global oil market.

Officials from other member countries were left stunned on Tuesday, as longstanding tensions between Abu Dhabi and the group’s de facto leader Saudi Arabia culminated in the sudden announcement that OPEC’s third-largest producer will exit in a matter of days. 

For OPEC and its partners, the departure will dilute their ability to manage oil prices by adjusting supply, while positioning the UAE as a wild-card player — and one that has long chafed against the constraints imposed by OPEC quotas — at a time of unprecedented upheaval in the global market. 

Most immediately, production from the UAE and its Gulf neighbours is being throttled by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, leaving the rest of the world desperate for supplies and rendering OPEC quotas meaningless. But once the oil starts flowing again, the UAE’s departure threatens to eventually set the stage for a renewed rush for market share and future price wars. Already, officials have signalled their intention to boost production. 

Several officials at other OPEC+ members said they did not expect a wider exodus to immediately follow the UAE. 

But the departure of one of the group’s most influential members will still raise wider questions. OPEC’s power has been eroded in recent years as new production flooded the market, particularly from US shale. Saudi Arabia, which has styled itself as the steward of the global market, has struggled to rein in overproducing members, while the group has already seen a trickle of smaller members leaving over the past decade. 

“OPEC’s market power will diminish,” said Greg Brew, an analyst at consultants Eurasia Group. “The UAE’s departure will undermine the group’s credibility, as the emirates represented a significant portion of overall OPEC capacity.”

This account is based on conversations with about a dozen people familiar with the matter, most of whom asked not to be identified discussing private information. 

The UAE’s decision to exit OPEC was years in the making, some of the people said, stretching back to the start of the decade, when the upheaval from the Covid pandemic helped drive fault lines over oil policy between longtime allies Abu Dhabi and Riyadh.

Those strains reflected a clash of visions: between the UAE’s ambitions to make use of its hydrocarbon riches before the energy transition hits a tipping point, and Riyadh’s preference to carefully manage crude production and prices. It runs in parallel to their competition for the role of Middle East business capital, and to project political influence across the region. 

The UAE’s position was shaped by a powerful figure in the emirate: Sultan Al Jaber, chief executive officer of Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., who often chafed against the constraints imposed by OPEC+ quotas.  

Having invested billions in new production capacity, the UAE was eager to recoup its expenditures and bolstered output in excess of its stipulated limit — earning a rare public rebuke from Saudi Arabia. Abu Dhabi floated the prospect of quitting the alliance, but never followed through.

The UAE’s preparation for a departure gathered pace around the end of last year. What finally brought a tipping point was the war in Iran, Energy Minister Suhail Al Mazrouei said in an interview. 

The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway connecting the Persian Gulf with international markets, forced producers in the area — the Saudis, the UAE, Iraq and Kuwait — to shut in at least 10 million barrels a day, or 10 per cent of world supplies, according to the International Energy Agency.

With production constrained, the shutdown meant the UAE’s exit from OPEC+ would be less disruptive, Mazrouei said. And by leaving, the country will be able to meet the rebound in fuel consumption after the war unfettered by OPEC+ production quotas.

“If oil producing capacity is leaving the cartel’s influence, that’s bearish” over a three-to-five year timeframe, said Clayton Seigle, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “It doesn’t mean that OPEC+ can’t succeed in managing the market, but the obvious fear we all have to imagine is a domino effect, and other coalition members follow Abu Dhabi out the door. That’s the number one question in my mind.”

OPEC’s importance resides in its readiness to balance oil markets, particularly by cutting production when consumption slumps, such as during the financial crisis in 2008 and the Covid pandemic in 2020.

Now, responsibility for balancing supply with demand in the future will fall on an ever-dwindling circle of nations in the OPEC+ alliance, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia. While Riyadh has shouldered the burden of future supply adjustments, the next-biggest nations in the coalition — like Iraq, Kazakhstan and Russia — have shown far less reliable commitment than the kingdom’s.

Saudi Arabia has signalled frustration with its own loss of market share, as some alliance partners joined other suppliers around the world in pumping more and more oil. Last year, the kingdom led the OPEC+ alliance in a dramatic strategy shift to boost supply, abandoning its longstanding strategy of supporting prices.

Still, while Abu Dhabi has rapidly expanded capacity and has ambitions to boost supply, it’s not clear how much further room it has to pump more. Estimates of UAE production vary significantly, but many analysts and traders believe that, before the war, it was already pumping near maximum levels. The country produced 3.64 million barrels a day in February, far above official numbers, according to the IEA. Several traders believe the real figure was even higher. 

“UAE production was at capacity for a long, long time — they ignored OPEC+ quotas,” said Gary Ross, a veteran oil consultant turned hedge fund manager at Black Gold Investors LLC. “Effectively, it’s Saudi Arabia that balances the market. At the end of the day’s that’s what OPEC is: Saudi Arabia.” 

And its departure doesn’t appear to present an imminent breakdown of the coalition. Several delegates in the alliance — which spans both OPEC+ members and other countries like Russia and Kazakhstan — said they neither plan to follow the UAE out the door, nor see its departure triggering a wider exodus. 

The real test of OPEC’s remaining potency will come the next time it’s compelled to intervene. The fallout from the Iran war will mean that the market needs all the oil it can get for some time to come, even after the Strait of Hormuz reopens. 

“What’s less clear is when we will have oversupply again and the need for supply control,” said Bob McNally, president of Rapidan Energy Group and a former White House official. “It could be many years from now.”

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2026 Bloomberg L.P.

Published on April 29, 2026



Source link

YouTube
Instagram
WhatsApp